Literature DB >> 25236759

Attitudes toward postmortem cornea donation in Germany: a multicenter survey.

C E Uhlig1, R Koch, J Promesberger, G Hirschfeld, H Schmidt, B Seitz, T Reinhard, D Böhringer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyse the willingness for postmortem cornea donation in Germany.
METHODS: Employees in two cities (UKM, UKS), and university hospitals (STM, STE), members of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG), and employees of an automobile company (BO) participated in a questionnaire about postmortem cornea donation attitudes. The questionnaire consisted of demographic items, motives concerning postmortem cornea donation, general attitudes toward donation, and questions concerning the perceived needs for information about donation. The statistical analyses included logistic regression with the target parameter of 'willingness to donate cornea postmortem'.
RESULTS: Of the participants, 67.7 % (UKM, UKS), 70.9 % (STM, STE), 70.8 % (BO), and 79.4 % (DOG) declared their intention to donate their corneas postmortem. Younger age (p < 0.001), poorer general health (p < 0.05), faith in an eternal life (p < 0.05), disagreement with brain death diagnostics (p < 0.001), fear of receiving worse medical treatment (p < 0.001), and fear of the commercialization of organs (p < 0.001) were found to be risk factors for a negative attitude toward postmortem cornea. The majority of participants (57.4 %) indicated that additional information about donation would be appreciated, and the internet (69.9 %) was considered the most appropriate means for conveying this information.
CONCLUSIONS: Emotional items were revealed to be the most relevant factors influencing the willingness to donate cornea postmortem, which may be counteracted by means of public education. The relatively low willingness among the medical staff contrasts with previous observations in a professional ophthalmologic society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25236759     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2796-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  25 in total

1.  [The main factors related with cornea non-donation of potential donors in a university hospital of Curitiba].

Authors:  Dayane Cristine Issaho; Marília Barreto Tenório; Hamilton Moreira
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.872

2.  Knowledge and attitudes toward organ/tissue donation and transplantation among health care professionals working in organ transplantation or dialysis units.

Authors:  T Demir; D Selimen; M Yildirim; H F Kucuk
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  [The 2009 performance report of the German cornea banks].

Authors:  N Schrage; T Reinhard; B Seitz; M Hermel; D Böhringer; H Reinshagen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Specific unwillingness to donate eyes: the impact of disfigurement, knowledge and procurement on corneal donation.

Authors:  M Lawlor; I Kerridge; R Ankeny; T A Dobbins; F Billson
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Consent for corneal donation: the effect of age of the deceased, registered intent and which family member is asked about donation.

Authors:  M Lawlor; T Dobbins; K-A Thomas; F Billson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The process of organ donation and its effect on consent.

Authors:  L A Siminoff; R M Arnold; J Hewlett
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Evaluation of organ donor card holders among public officials of a major German city.

Authors:  M Heuer; S Hertel; U Wirges; T Philipp; G Gerken; A Paul; G M Kaiser
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

8.  Theoretic rates of potential tissue donation in a university hospital.

Authors:  T Pont; R M Gràcia; C Valdés; C Nieto; L Rodellar; I Arancibia; R Deulofeu Vilarnau
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Family responses to donor designation in donation cases: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Diane Dodd-McCue; Robin Cowherd; Amy Iveson; Kevin Myer
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.065

10.  Family and staff responses to a scripted introduction to tissue donation for hospice inpatients on admission.

Authors:  Patricia Niday; Caitlyn Painter; Joyce Peak; Eileen Bennett; Mandy Wiley; Lee McCartt; Otto H P Teixeira
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.065

View more
  5 in total

1.  Obstacles to Post-mortem Cornea Donation: A Study From a Tribal Region in Eastern India.

Authors:  Suchitra Panigrahi; Bidisha Mahapatra; Sandhyarani Pati; Shibanee Jena; Sunil K Murmu; Punyanshu Mohanty
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-20

2.  [Corneal donation : Dilemma between growing demand and declining donor rate].

Authors:  F Schaub; H G Simons; P Enders; B O Bachmann; S Roters; C Cursiefen; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Attitude, beliefs and awareness towards corneal donation in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Latifa F Alanazi; Shaikha H Aldossari; Mohammed A Gogandy; Ghazai A Althubaiti; Beshayer F Alanazi; Abdullah M Alfawaz
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-26

4.  Eye donation in north India: Trends, awareness, influences and barriers.

Authors:  Manisha Acharya; Javed Hussain Farooqui; Abhishek Dave; Deepali Chaku; K K Ganguly; Animesh Das; Umang Mathur
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Disgust Sensitivity and Support for Organ Donation: Time to Take Disgust Seriously.

Authors:  Lucas B Mazur; Erik Gormsen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.