Literature DB >> 23631339

Legal briefing: Shared decision making and patient decision aids.

Thaddeus Mason Pope1, Melinda Hexum.   

Abstract

This "Legal Briefing" column covers recent legal developments involving patient decision aids.This topic has been the subject of recent articles in JCE. It is included in the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. And it has received significant attention in the biomedical literature, including a new book, a thematic issue of Health Affairs, and a recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine. Moreover, physicians and health systems across the United States are increasingly integrating decision aids into their clinical practice. Both federal and state laws play a significant role in promoting this expanded use. On the other hand, concerns about liability could stymie development and implementation. We categorize legal developments concerning patient decision aids into the following five sections: 1. Development of decision aids. 2. Effectiveness of decision aids. 3. Federal regulation of decision aids. 4. State regulation of decision aids. 5. Legal concerns regarding decision aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23631339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ethics        ISSN: 1046-7890


  8 in total

1.  How cardiologists present the benefits of percutaneous coronary interventions to patients with stable angina: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Sarah L Goff; Kathleen M Mazor; Henry H Ting; Reva Kleppel; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  The opportunities and challenges for shared decision-making in the rural United States.

Authors:  William A Nelson; Paul J Barr; Mary G Castaldo
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Assessment of patient empowerment--a systematic review of measures.

Authors:  Paul J Barr; Isabelle Scholl; Paulina Bravo; Marjan J Faber; Glyn Elwyn; Marion McAllister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Measurement challenges in shared decision making: putting the 'patient' in patient-reported measures.

Authors:  Paul J Barr; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Effect of a Website That Presents Patients' Experiences on Self-Efficacy and Patient Competence of Colorectal Cancer Patients: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jürgen M Giesler; Bettina Keller; Tim Repke; Rainer Leonhart; Joachim Weis; Rebecca Muckelbauer; Nina Rieckmann; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Gabriele Lucius-Hoene; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Shared decision making and the practice of community translation in presenting a pre-final Afrikaans for the Western Cape Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire: a proposal for improved translation and cross-cultural adaptation.

Authors:  Susan de Klerk; Christina Jerosch-Herold; Helen Buchanan; Lana van Niekerk
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2019-08-14

Review 7.  Decision-Making in the Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer: Factors Influencing Women's Choices for Mastectomy and Breast Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Emily Catherine Bellavance; Susan Beth Kesmodel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Quantity over quality-Findings from a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids on early abortion methods.

Authors:  Kyla Z Donnelly; Glyn Elwyn; Rachel Thompson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.377

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.