Literature DB >> 26013844

The opportunities and challenges for shared decision-making in the rural United States.

William A Nelson1, Paul J Barr, Mary G Castaldo.   

Abstract

The ethical standard for informed consent is fostered within a shared decision-making (SDM) process. SDM has become a recognized and needed approach in health care decision-making. Based on an ethical foundation, the approach fosters the active engagement of patients, where the clinician presents evidence-based treatment information and options and openly elicits the patient's values and preferences. The SDM process is affected by the context in which the information exchange occurs. Rural settings are one context that impacts the delivery of health care and SDM. Rural health care is significantly influenced by economic, geographical and social characteristics. Several specific distinctive features influence rural health care decision-making-poverty, access to health care, isolation, over-lapping relationships, and a shared culture. The rural context creates challenges as well as fosters opportunities for the application of SDM as a natural dynamic within the rural provider-patient relationship. To fulfill the ethical requirements of informed consent through SDM, it is necessary to understand its inherent challenges and opportunities. Therefore, rural clinicians and ethicists need to be cognizant of the impact of the rural setting on SDM and use the insights as an opportunity to achieve SDM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26013844     DOI: 10.1007/s10730-015-9283-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  29 in total

1.  An office on Main Street. Health care dilemmas in small communities.

Authors:  L W Roberts; J Battaglia; M Smithpeter; R S Epstein
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 2.  The changing nature of rural health care.

Authors:  T C Ricketts
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Voices from the margins: a context for developing bioethics-related resources in rural areas.

Authors:  A F Cook; H Hoas
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  The presence of ethics programs in critical access hospitals.

Authors:  William A Nelson; Marie-Claire Rosenberg; Todd Mackenzie; William B Weeks
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-12

5.  Rural and non-rural differences in membership of the American Society of Bioethics and Humanities.

Authors:  William Nelson; William B Weeks
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Rethinking informed consent: the case for shared medical decision-making.

Authors:  Jaime Staples King; Benjamin W Moulton
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2006

7.  A proposed rural healthcare ethics agenda.

Authors:  W Nelson; A Pomerantz; K Howard; A Bushy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice.

Authors:  Benjamin Moulton; Jaime S King
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  Perceptions of shared decision making and decision aids among rural primary care clinicians.

Authors:  Valerie J King; Melinda M Davis; Paul N Gorman; J Bruin Rugge; L J Fagnan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Legal briefing: Shared decision making and patient decision aids.

Authors:  Thaddeus Mason Pope; Melinda Hexum
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2013
View more
  1 in total

1.  Introduction: clinical ethics beyond the urban hospital.

Authors:  Erica K Salter; Joseph T Norris
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2015-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.