Literature DB >> 23625035

Social grooming among wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba in the Luo Scientific Reserve, DR Congo, with special reference to the formation of grooming gatherings.

Tetsuya Sakamaki1.   

Abstract

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) groom in gatherings in which many individuals may be connected via multiple chains of grooming and they often exchange partners with each other. They sometimes groom another while receiving grooming; that is, one animal can play two roles (i.e., groomer and groomee) simultaneously. Although this feature of chimpanzees is notable from the viewpoint of the evolution of human sociality, information on our other closest living relative, the bonobo (Pan paniscus), is still lacking. In this study, I describe grooming interactions of bonobos at Wamba in the Luo Scientific Reserve, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo), with a particular focus on the formation of grooming gatherings. Like chimpanzees, the bonobos also performed mutual grooming (two individuals grooming each other simultaneously) and polyadic grooming (three or more individuals). However, unlike chimpanzees, these sessions lasted for only a short time. Bonobos rarely groomed another while receiving grooming. Because social grooming occurred not only in trees but also in open spaces, including treefall gaps, the conditions did not necessarily limit the opportunity to make multiple chains of grooming. However, bonobos also engaged in social grooming in different ways from chimpanzees; That is, many individuals were involved simultaneously at a site, in which they separated for dyadic grooming. Some cases clearly showed that bonobos preferred a third party not to join while grooming in a dyad, suggesting that bonobos have a preference for grooming in dyads and that immature individuals formed the preference that was shared among adults while growing up. Most members of the study group ranged together during the majority of the study period. Although bonobos show a fission-fusion grouping pattern, when group members frequently encounter one another on a daily basis, they may not be motivated to form multiple grooming chains at this site, as do chimpanzees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23625035     DOI: 10.1007/s10329-013-0354-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Primates        ISSN: 0032-8332            Impact factor:   2.163


  9 in total

Review 1.  Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society.

Authors:  Takeshi Furuichi
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

2.  Mothers matter! Maternal support, dominance status and mating success in male bonobos (Pan paniscus).

Authors:  Martin Surbeck; Roger Mundry; Gottfried Hohmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Female feeding priority in bonobos, Pan paniscus, and the question of female dominance.

Authors:  Frances J White; Kimberley D Wood
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Is human conversation more efficient than chimpanzee grooming? : Comparison of clique sizes.

Authors:  M Nakamura
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2000-09

5.  'Gatherings' of social grooming among wild chimpanzees: implications for evolution of sociality.

Authors:  Michio Nakamura
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.895

6.  Group unity of chimpanzees elucidated by comparison of sex differences in short-range interactions in Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sakamaki
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.163

Review 7.  Factors underlying party size differences between chimpanzees and bonobos: a review and hypotheses for future study.

Authors:  Takeshi Furuichi
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.163

8.  Contrasting chimpanzees and bonobos: nearest neighbor distances and choices.

Authors:  F J White; C A Chapman
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Alpha male chimpanzee grooming patterns: implications for dominance "style".

Authors:  M W Foster; I C Gilby; C M Murray; A Johnson; E E Wroblewski; A E Pusey
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.371

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Do immigrant female bonobos prefer older resident females as important partners when integrating into a new group?

Authors:  Kazuya Toda; Takeshi Furuichi
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.781

Review 2.  Parochial cooperation in wild chimpanzees: a model to explain the evolution of parochial altruism.

Authors:  Sylvain R T Lemoine; Liran Samuni; Catherine Crockford; Roman M Wittig
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.237

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.