Literature DB >> 7797164

Contrasting chimpanzees and bonobos: nearest neighbor distances and choices.

F J White1, C A Chapman.   

Abstract

In an effort to understand factors underlying differences in the social organization of Pan troglodytes and P. paniscus, we measured the nearest neighbor distances and choices for chimpanzees in Kibale National Park, Uganda, and for bonobos in Lomako Forest, Zaire. We assume that the spatial organization of a set of individuals should reflect the underlying relationships between them. Bonobos were found to have smaller nearest neighbor distances than chimpanzees. The distribution and variability of the distances suggested that chimpanzees have a more restricted range of nearest neighbor distances than bonobos, avoiding situations of very close proximity. Selection of the sex of the nearest neighbor by a focal animal differed between the species. For example, male bonobos rarely had another male as their nearest neighbor, while male chimpanzees frequently did. Similarly, male bonobos tended to move apart when observed together, while it was female chimpanzees who tended to move apart when together. These observations are considered with respect to the nature of the social interactions in these species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7797164     DOI: 10.1159/000156818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)        ISSN: 0015-5713            Impact factor:   1.246


  7 in total

1.  Competition during sugarcane crop raiding by blond capuchin monkeys (Sapajus flavius).

Authors:  Poliana Gabriele Alves de Souza Lins; Renata Gonçalves Ferreira
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Genetic, spatial, and social relationships among adults in a group of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) from Barro Colorado Island, Panama.

Authors:  Katharine Milton; David A Nolin; Kelsey Ellis; Jeffrey Lozier; Brody Sandel; Eileen A Lacey
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Differences in the mutual eye gaze of bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Michele M Mulholland; Lindsay M Mahovetz; Mary Catherine Mareno; Lisa A Reamer; Steven J Schapiro; William D Hopkins
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Sex differences in human gregariousness.

Authors:  Joyce F Benenson; Sandra Stella; Anthony Ferranti
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Consistent differences in a virtual world model of ape societies.

Authors:  Bart J Wilson; Sarah F Brosnan; Elizabeth V Lonsdorf; Crickette M Sanz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Social grooming among wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba in the Luo Scientific Reserve, DR Congo, with special reference to the formation of grooming gatherings.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sakamaki
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Early life experience and alterations of group composition shape the social grooming networks of former pet and entertainment chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Dietmar Crailsheim; Hans Peter Stüger; Elfriede Kalcher-Sommersguter; Miquel Llorente
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.