Literature DB >> 19353234

Factors underlying party size differences between chimpanzees and bonobos: a review and hypotheses for future study.

Takeshi Furuichi1.   

Abstract

Differences in party size and cohesiveness among females have been primary topics in socio-ecological comparisons of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus). This paper aims to review previous studies that attempted to explain these differences and propose some hypotheses to be tested in future studies. Comparisons of recent data show that relative party size (expressed as a percentage of total group size) is significantly larger for bonobos than chimpanzees. Although the prolonged estrus of females, close association between mother and adult sons, female social relationships including unique homosexual behavior, and high female social status might be related to the increased party size and female cohesiveness of bonobos, these social and behavioral factors alone do not appear to explain the differences between the two species. Differences in ecological factors, including fruit-patch size, density of terrestrial herbs, and the availability of scattered foods that animals forage as they travel between large fruit patches could also contribute to the differences between chimpanzees and bonobos. However, these factors cannot fully account for the increased party size and female cohesiveness of bonobos. The higher female cohesiveness in bonobos may be explained by socio-ecological systems that reduce the cost in feeding efficiency incurred by attending mixed-sex parties. These systems may include female initiatives for party ranging movements as well as the factors mentioned above. Because of their geographical isolation, the two species probably evolved different social systems. Chimpanzees, whose habitats became very dry during some periods in the Pleistocene, likely evolved more flexible fission-fusion social systems to cope with seasonal and annual variation in food availability. On the other hand, bonobos had a large refugia forest in the middle of their range even during the driest periods in the Pleistocene. Therefore bonobos, whose habitats had more abundant food and smaller variation in food availability, probably evolved systems that help females stay in mixed parties without incurring large costs from contest and scramble competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19353234     DOI: 10.1007/s10329-009-0141-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Primates        ISSN: 0032-8332            Impact factor:   2.163


  18 in total

1.  Mahale chimpanzees: grouping patterns and cycling females.

Authors:  A Matsumoto-Oda
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 2.  Mechanisms and tempo of evolution in the African Guineo-Congolian rainforest.

Authors:  Vanessa Plana
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Female relationships in bonobos(Pan paniscus) : Evidence for bonding, cooperation, and female dominance in a male-philopatric species.

Authors:  A R Parish
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1996-03

Review 4.  A model of the biogeographical journey from Proto-pan to Pan paniscus.

Authors:  Jo A Myers Thompson
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  The primate community of the Lopé Reserve, Gabon: diets, responses to fruit scarcity, and effects on biomass.

Authors:  C E Tutin; R M Ham; L J White; M J Harrison
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.371

6.  Chimpanzee grouping patterns and food availability in Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania.

Authors:  Noriko Itoh; Toshisada Nishida
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Comparison of behavioral sequence of copulation between chimpanzees and bonobos.

Authors:  Chie Hashimoto; Takeshi Furuichi
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 2.163

8.  Y-chromosome analysis confirms highly sex-biased dispersal and suggests a low male effective population size in bonobos (Pan paniscus).

Authors:  Jonas Eriksson; Heike Siedel; Dieter Lukas; Manfred Kayser; Axel Erler; Chie Hashimoto; Gottfried Hohmann; Christophe Boesch; Linda Vigilant
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Female feeding priority in bonobos, Pan paniscus, and the question of female dominance.

Authors:  Frances J White; Kimberley D Wood
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.371

10.  Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba.

Authors:  G Idani
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.246

View more
  23 in total

1.  Seed predation by bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Kokolopori, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Authors:  Alexander V Georgiev; Melissa Emery Thompson; Albert Lotana Lokasola; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Bonobos apparently search for a lost member injured by a snare.

Authors:  Nahoko Tokuyama; Besao Emikey; Batuafe Bafike; Batuafe Isolumbo; Bahanande Iyokango; Mbangi N Mulavwa; Takeshi Furuichi
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  The Conditions Favoring Between-Community Raiding in Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and Human Foragers.

Authors:  Sagar A Pandit; Gauri R Pradhan; Hennadii Balashov; Carel P Van Schaik
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-06

4.  Bonobo habituation in a forest-savanna mosaic habitat: influence of ape species, habitat type, and sociocultural context.

Authors:  Victor Narat; Flora Pennec; Bruno Simmen; Jean Christophe Bokika Ngawolo; Sabrina Krief
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  Y chromosomal variation tracks the evolution of mating systems in chimpanzee and bonobo.

Authors:  Felix Schaller; Antonio M Fernandes; Christine Hodler; Claudia Münch; Juan J Pasantes; Wolfram Rietschel; Werner Schempp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Human identity and the evolution of societies.

Authors:  Mark W Moffett
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-09

7.  Gregariousness, foraging effort, and affiliative interactions in lactating bonobos and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Sean M Lee; Gottfried Hohmann; Elizabeth V Lonsdorf; Barbara Fruth; Carson M Murray
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.671

8.  Y-Chromosome variation in hominids: intraspecific variation is limited to the polygamous chimpanzee.

Authors:  Gabriele Greve; Evguenia Alechine; Juan J Pasantes; Christine Hodler; Wolfram Rietschel; Terence J Robinson; Werner Schempp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Communication during sex among female bonobos: effects of dominance, solicitation and audience.

Authors:  Zanna Clay; Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Social grooming among wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba in the Luo Scientific Reserve, DR Congo, with special reference to the formation of grooming gatherings.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sakamaki
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.163

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.