Literature DB >> 23623240

Paradoxical EU agricultural policies on genetically engineered crops.

Gemma Masip1, Maite Sabalza, Eduard Pérez-Massot, Raviraj Banakar, David Cebrian, Richard M Twyman, Teresa Capell, Ramon Albajes, Paul Christou.   

Abstract

European Union (EU) agricultural policy has been developed in the pursuit of laudable goals such as a competitive economy and regulatory harmony across the union. However, what has emerged is a fragmented, contradictory, and unworkable legislative framework that threatens economic disaster. In this review, we present case studies highlighting differences in the regulations applied to foods grown in EU countries and identical imported products, which show that the EU is undermining its own competitiveness in the agricultural sector, damaging both the EU and its humanitarian activities in the developing world. We recommend the adoption of rational, science-based principles for the harmonization of agricultural policies to prevent economic decline and lower standards of living across the continent.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23623240     DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Plant Sci        ISSN: 1360-1385            Impact factor:   18.313


  12 in total

1.  Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Olivier Sanvido; Joyce Tait; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  Fruit crops in the era of genome editing: closing the regulatory gap.

Authors:  Derry Alvarez; Pedro Cerda-Bennasser; Evan Stowe; Fabiola Ramirez-Torres; Teresa Capell; Amit Dhingra; Paul Christou
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 3.  New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.

Authors:  John Davison; Klaus Ammann
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  The EU legislation on "GMOs" between nonsense and protectionism: An ongoing Schumpeterian chain of public choices.

Authors:  Giovanni Tagliabue
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.074

5.  Regulation of Molecular Farming Products.

Authors:  Penny A C Hundleby; Marc-André D'Aoust; Carolyn Finkle; Judith Atkins; Richard M Twyman
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Suitability of Chinese oak silkworm eggs for the multigenerational rearing of the parasitoid Trichogramma leucaniae.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Xuan-Ye Wen; Yang-Yang Hou; Nicolas Desneux; Asad Ali; Lian-Sheng Zang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Double-Stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) as a Sustainable Tool against Gray Mold (Botrytis cinerea) in Grapevine: Effectiveness of Different Application Methods in an Open-Air Environment.

Authors:  Luca Nerva; Marco Sandrini; Giorgio Gambino; Walter Chitarra
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-01-29

Review 8.  Removing politics from innovations that improve food security.

Authors:  Stuart J Smyth; Alan McHughen; Jon Entine; Drew Kershen; Carl Ramage; Wayne Parrott
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  GMOs in animal agriculture: time to consider both costs and benefits in regulatory evaluations.

Authors:  Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-25

10.  Paternal inheritance of plastid-encoded transgenes in Petunia hybrida in the greenhouse and under field conditions.

Authors:  Patricia Horn; Henrik Nausch; Susanne Baars; Jörg Schmidtke; Kerstin Schmidt; Anja Schneider; Dario Leister; Inge Broer
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2017-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.