Literature DB >> 23621527

Effect of bracket bevel design and oral environmental factors on frictional resistance.

Chen-Jung Chang1, Tzer-Min Lee, Jia-Kuang Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of bracket bevel design and oral environmental factors (saliva, temperature) on frictional resistance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five types of brackets, namely a conventional bracket (Omni-arch), an active self-ligating bracket (Clippy), and three passive self-ligating brackets (Carriere, Damon, and Tenbrook T1) coupled with a 0.014-inch austenitic nickel-titanium archwire were tested. In the experimental model, which used a group of five identical brackets, the center bracket was displaced 3 mm to mimic the binding effects. The friction experiments were performed at three temperatures (20°C, 37°C, 55°C) in a dry or a wet (artificial saliva) state. Finally, the surfaces of the bracket slots were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after the friction tests.
RESULTS: The sliding frictional force was significantly influenced by the bracket slot bevel and saliva whether in the active or passive configuration (P < .05). The frictional force significantly increased as the temperature increased in the active configuration (P < .01). Based on the SEM observations, a correlation was found among the level of frictional force, the bevel angle, and the depth of scratches on bracket bevels.
CONCLUSION: Frictional force can be reduced by increasing the bevel angle and by lowering the oral temperature, whereas the presence of saliva increases frictional resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23621527      PMCID: PMC8722825          DOI: 10.2319/101612-808.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  29 in total

1.  The effect of short-term temperature changes on superelastic nickel-titanium archwires activated in orthodontic bending.

Authors:  T R Meling; J Odegaard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances in the dry and wet states: influence of archwire alloy, interbracket distance, and bracket engagement.

Authors:  R P Kusy; J Q Whitley
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-12-15

3.  Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states.

Authors:  Glenys A Thorstenson; Robert P Kusy
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  D H Pratten; K Popli; N Germane; J C Gunsolley
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance between brackets with passive-ligation designs.

Authors:  Chin-Liang Yeh; Budi Kusnoto; Grace Viana; Carla A Evans; James L Drummond
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.

Authors:  Zacharias Fourie; Mutlu Ozcan; Andrew Sandham
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.

Authors:  Giovanni Matarese; Riccardo Nucera; Angela Militi; Manuela Mazza; Marco Portelli; Felice Festa; Giancarlo Cordasco
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 8.  Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials.

Authors:  R P Kusy; J Q Whitley
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.970

9.  A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation.

Authors:  A P Sims; N E Waters; D J Birnie; R J Pethybridge
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.

Authors:  Umal H Doshi; Wasundhara A Bhad-Patil
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  8 in total

1.  Study of force loss due to friction comparing two ceramic brackets during sliding tooth movement.

Authors:  Mai AlSubaie; Nabeel Talic; Said Khawatmi; Ahmad Alobeid; Christoph Bourauel; Tarek El-Bialy
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials : In vitro analysis.

Authors:  Lutz Hodecker; Christoph Bourauel; Bert Braumann; Teresa Kruse; Hildegard Christ; Sven Scharf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Comparison of Frictional Forces Generated by a New Ceramic Bracket with the Conventional Brackets using Unconventional and Conventional Ligation System and the Self-ligating Brackets: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Azam Pasha; Swati Vishwakarma; Anjali Narayan; K Vinay; Smitha V Shetty; Partha Pratim Roy
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-09

4.  Lubricating conditions: effects on friction between orthodontic brackets and archwires with different cross-sections.

Authors:  Fabrício Anderson Carvalho Almeida; Anna Paula Costa Ponte Sousa Carvalho Almeida; Flávia Lucisano Botelho Amaral; Roberta Tarkany Basting; Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França; Cecilia Pedroso Turssi
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-05-20

5.  Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study.

Authors:  Anca-Oana Dragomirescu; Maria-Angelica Bencze; Adriana Vasilache; Elina Teodorescu; Cristina-Crenguța Albu; Nicoleta Olivia Popoviciu; Ecaterina Ionescu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Friction Force Adjustment by an Innovative Covering System Applied with Superelastic NiTi Brackets and Wires-An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  Andrea Wichelhaus; Tena Eichenberg; Philip Gruber; Elias Panos Bamidis; Thomas Stocker
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.748

7.  Comparison of static friction and surface topography of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic arch wires: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Nouf Alsabti; Nabeel Talic
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-03-19

Review 8.  Resistance to sliding in orthodontics: misconception or method error? A systematic review and a proposal of a test protocol.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Aggeliki Papoutsi; Simona Dianiskova; Domenico Dalessandri; Stefano Bonetti; James K H Tsoi; Jukka P Matinlinna; Corrado Paganelli
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.