BACKGROUND: The insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) pathway is known to play a role in the acquisition of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its exact role in TKI resistance has so far remained unclear. Here, we interrogated the hypothesis that the IGF-1R may serve as a biomarker for, and may play a role in, intrinsic resistance to the EGFR-specific TKI gefitinib in NSCLC. METHODS: Total-IGF-1R and phosphorylated (p)-IGF-1R expression levels were related to gefitinib sensitivity in 23 NSCLC cell lines. This sensitivity was re-evaluated after knocking down IGF-1R expression and after IGF-1R up-regulation through exogenous IGF-1 expression. The utility of IGF-1R expression as a predictive biomarker was also evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 98 primary NSCLC samples from patients treated with gefitinib. RESULTS: Seventeen of the cell lines tested were resistant to gefitinib, whereas 3 cell lines were sensitive. The three remaining cell lines showed intermediate values. Thirteen resistant cell lines were found to be positive for total-IGF-1R expression, while all the sensitive cell lines were negative, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81% for total-IGF-1R to predict resistance. Seven resistant cell lines exhibited high p-IGF-1R levels, whereas all 3 sensitive cell lines were negative for p-IGF-1R, resulting in a PPV of 100% for p-IGF-1R to predict resistance. Neither a knock-down of IGF-1R expression nor an activation of the IGF1-R pathway through exogenous IGF-1 expression affected gefitinib sensitivity. In primary NSCLC tissues, IGF-1R expression was found to be significantly higher in patients with progressive disease, i.e., showing gefitinib resistance, as compared to those with a complete or partial response. CONCLUSIONS: IGF-1R acts as a predictor for resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC cell lines and NSCLC patients, but does not seem to play a role in the intrinsic resistance to this drug. High total-IGF-1R and p-IGR-1R levels may predict such a resistance. Since the underlying mechanism does not appear to be related to proliferation induction, alternative pathways should be explored.
BACKGROUND: The insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) pathway is known to play a role in the acquisition of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its exact role in TKI resistance has so far remained unclear. Here, we interrogated the hypothesis that the IGF-1R may serve as a biomarker for, and may play a role in, intrinsic resistance to the EGFR-specific TKI gefitinib in NSCLC. METHODS: Total-IGF-1R and phosphorylated (p)-IGF-1R expression levels were related to gefitinib sensitivity in 23 NSCLC cell lines. This sensitivity was re-evaluated after knocking down IGF-1R expression and after IGF-1R up-regulation through exogenous IGF-1 expression. The utility of IGF-1R expression as a predictive biomarker was also evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 98 primary NSCLC samples from patients treated with gefitinib. RESULTS: Seventeen of the cell lines tested were resistant to gefitinib, whereas 3 cell lines were sensitive. The three remaining cell lines showed intermediate values. Thirteen resistant cell lines were found to be positive for total-IGF-1R expression, while all the sensitive cell lines were negative, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81% for total-IGF-1R to predict resistance. Seven resistant cell lines exhibited high p-IGF-1R levels, whereas all 3 sensitive cell lines were negative for p-IGF-1R, resulting in a PPV of 100% for p-IGF-1R to predict resistance. Neither a knock-down of IGF-1R expression nor an activation of the IGF1-R pathway through exogenous IGF-1 expression affected gefitinib sensitivity. In primary NSCLC tissues, IGF-1R expression was found to be significantly higher in patients with progressive disease, i.e., showing gefitinib resistance, as compared to those with a complete or partial response. CONCLUSIONS:IGF-1R acts as a predictor for resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC cell lines and NSCLCpatients, but does not seem to play a role in the intrinsic resistance to this drug. High total-IGF-1R and p-IGR-1R levels may predict such a resistance. Since the underlying mechanism does not appear to be related to proliferation induction, alternative pathways should be explored.
Authors: Rafal Dziadziuszko; Daniel T Merrick; Samir E Witta; Adelita D Mendoza; Barbara Szostakiewicz; Amelia Szymanowska; Witold Rzyman; Katarzyna Dziadziuszko; Jacek Jassem; Paul A Bunn; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Fred R Hirsch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gautam Maulik; Takashi Kijima; Patrick C Ma; Sudip K Ghosh; Jeffrey Lin; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Erik Schaefer; Elena Tibaldi; Bruce E Johnson; Ravi Salgia Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Paul A Bunn; Wilbur A Franklin; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Nick Thatcher; Alex Chang; Purvish Parikh; José Rodrigues Pereira; Tudor Ciuleanu; Joachim von Pawel; Claire Watkins; Angela Flannery; Gillian Ellison; Emma Donald; Lucy Knight; Dinah Parums; Nicholas Botwood; Brian Holloway Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Teresa Moran; Cristina Queralt; Rut Porta; Felipe Cardenal; Carlos Camps; Margarita Majem; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Dolores Isla; Mariano Provencio; Amelia Insa; Bartomeu Massuti; Jose Luis Gonzalez-Larriba; Luis Paz-Ares; Isabel Bover; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Miguel Angel Moreno; Silvia Catot; Christian Rolfo; Noemi Reguart; Ramon Palmero; José Miguel Sánchez; Roman Bastus; Clara Mayo; Jordi Bertran-Alamillo; Miguel Angel Molina; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miquel Taron Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: F Cappuzzo; P A Jänne; M Skokan; G Finocchiaro; E Rossi; C Ligorio; P A Zucali; L Terracciano; L Toschi; M Roncalli; A Destro; M Incarbone; M Alloisio; A Santoro; M Varella-Garcia Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-10-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: P A Zucali; M G Ruiz; E Giovannetti; A Destro; M Varella-Garcia; K Floor; G L Ceresoli; J A Rodriguez; I Garassino; P Comoglio; M Roncalli; A Santoro; G Giaccone Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-05-07 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: V Ludovini; G Bellezza; L Pistola; F Bianconi; L Di Carlo; A Sidoni; A Semeraro; R Del Sordo; F R Tofanetti; M G Mameli; G Daddi; A Cavaliere; M Tonato; L Crinò Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-01-19 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Osamu Tetsu; Matthew J Hangauer; Janyaporn Phuchareon; David W Eisele; Frank McCormick Journal: Chemotherapy Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 2.544
Authors: Hongyu Zhou; Weiping Qian; Fatih M Uckun; Liya Wang; Y Andrew Wang; Hongyu Chen; David Kooby; Qian Yu; Malgorzata Lipowska; Charles A Staley; Hui Mao; Lily Yang Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 15.881