PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) protein expression, mRNA expression, and gene copy number in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) in relation to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression, patient characteristics, and prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-nine patients with NSCLC who underwent curative pulmonary resection were studied (median follow-up, 5.3 years). IGF1R protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with two anti-IGF1R antibodies (n = 179). EGFR protein expression was assessed with PharmDx kit. IGF1R gene expression was evaluated using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) from 114 corresponding fresh-frozen samples. IGF1R gene copy number was assessed by fluorescent in situ hybridization using customized probes (n = 181). RESULTS: IGF1R IHC score was higher in squamous cell carcinomas versus other histologies (P < .001) and associated with stage (P = .03) but not survival (P = .46). IGF1R and EGFR protein expression showed significant correlation (r = 0.30; P < .001). IGF1R gene expression by qRT-PCR was higher in squamous cell versus other histologies (P = .006) and did not associate with other clinical features nor survival (P = .73). Employing criteria previously established for EGFR copy number, patients with IGF1R amplification/high polysomy (n = 48; 27%) had 3-year survival of 58%, patients with low polysomy (n = 87; 48%) had 3-year survival of 47% and patients with trisomy/disomy (n = 46; 25%) had 3-year survival of 35%, respectively (P = .024). Prognostic value of high IGF1R gene copy number was confirmed in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: IGF1R protein expression is higher in squamous cell versus other histologies and correlates with EGFR expression. IGF1R protein and gene expression does not associate with survival, whereas high IGF1R gene copy number harbors positive prognostic value.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) protein expression, mRNA expression, and gene copy number in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) in relation to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression, patient characteristics, and prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-nine patients with NSCLC who underwent curative pulmonary resection were studied (median follow-up, 5.3 years). IGF1R protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with two anti-IGF1R antibodies (n = 179). EGFR protein expression was assessed with PharmDx kit. IGF1R gene expression was evaluated using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) from 114 corresponding fresh-frozen samples. IGF1R gene copy number was assessed by fluorescent in situ hybridization using customized probes (n = 181). RESULTS:IGF1R IHC score was higher in squamous cell carcinomas versus other histologies (P < .001) and associated with stage (P = .03) but not survival (P = .46). IGF1R and EGFR protein expression showed significant correlation (r = 0.30; P < .001). IGF1R gene expression by qRT-PCR was higher in squamous cell versus other histologies (P = .006) and did not associate with other clinical features nor survival (P = .73). Employing criteria previously established for EGFR copy number, patients with IGF1R amplification/high polysomy (n = 48; 27%) had 3-year survival of 58%, patients with low polysomy (n = 87; 48%) had 3-year survival of 47% and patients with trisomy/disomy (n = 46; 25%) had 3-year survival of 35%, respectively (P = .024). Prognostic value of high IGF1R gene copy number was confirmed in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION:IGF1R protein expression is higher in squamous cell versus other histologies and correlates with EGFR expression. IGF1R protein and gene expression does not associate with survival, whereas high IGF1R gene copy number harbors positive prognostic value.
Authors: H E Jones; L Goddard; J M W Gee; S Hiscox; M Rubini; D Barrow; J M Knowlden; S Williams; A E Wakeling; R I Nicholson Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: David A Eberhard; Bruce E Johnson; Lukas C Amler; Audrey D Goddard; Sherry L Heldens; Roy S Herbst; William L Ince; Pasi A Jänne; Thomas Januario; David H Johnson; Pam Klein; Vincent A Miller; Michael A Ostland; David A Ramies; Dragan Sebisanovic; Jeremy A Stinson; Yu R Zhang; Somasekar Seshagiri; Kenneth J Hillan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F Cappuzzo; L Toschi; G Tallini; G L Ceresoli; I Domenichini; S Bartolini; G Finocchiaro; E Magrini; G Metro; A Cancellieri; R Trisolini; L Crino; P A Bunn; A Santoro; W A Franklin; M Varella-Garcia; F R Hirsch Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2006-04-06 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Rafal Dziadziuszko; Samir E Witta; Federico Cappuzzo; Seongjin Park; Koji Tanaka; Peter V Danenberg; Anna E Barón; Lucio Crino; Wilbur A Franklin; Paul A Bunn; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Kathleen D Danenberg; Fred R Hirsch Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Paul A Bunn; Michael V Di Maria; Robert Veve; Roy M Bremmes; Anna E Barón; Chan Zeng; Wilbur A Franklin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-09-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L H Defize; J Boonstra; J Meisenhelder; W Kruijer; L G Tertoolen; B C Tilly; T Hunter; P M van Bergen en Henegouwen; W H Moolenaar; S W de Laat Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 1989-11 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Jin-Soo Kim; Edward S Kim; Diane Liu; J Jack Lee; Luisa Solis; Carmen Behrens; Scott M Lippman; Waun Ki Hong; Ignacio I Wistuba; Ho-Young Lee Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Dylan M Glubb; Elisa Cerri; Alexandra Giese; Wei Zhang; Osman Mirza; Emma E Thompson; Peixian Chen; Soma Das; Jacek Jassem; Witold Rzyman; Mark W Lingen; Ravi Salgia; Fred R Hirsch; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Kurt Ballmer-Hofer; Federico Innocenti Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 12.531