Literature DB >> 33215900

Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplant in Elderly Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Is There an Appropriate Upper Age Cutoff?

David S Goldberg1, Rodrigo M Vianna2, Eric Fleming Martin1,2, Paul Martin1, Leopoldo Ramon Arosemena Benitez1,2, Christopher Blackburn O'Brien1,2, Kalyan R Bhamidimarri1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aging of liver transplant (LT) recipients, the weighting of the model for end-stage liver disease score, and the increased prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis has led to an increased number of older LT recipients with pre-LT chronic kidney disease (CKD). There are limited data on the impact of increased recipient age on post-simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant outcomes among patients with CKD, leading some centers to employ subjective age cutoffs for potential SLK recipients.
METHODS: We evaluated United Network for Organ Sharing data of adult SLK recipients from February 27, 2002, to December 31, 2018, restricted to recipients with ≥90 days of waiting time and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate persistently <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for ≥90 d using the modification of diet in renal disease-4 equation). We fit mixed-effects Cox regression models (center as random effect) to evaluate the association of recipient age and patient survival.
RESULTS: Among 3146 SLK recipients with CKD, nearly two-thirds were 50-64 years of age, while 465 (14.8%) and 93 (3.0%) were 65-69 years and ≥70 years, respectively. Compared with nondiabetic SLK recipients aged 50-59 years, SLK recipients ≥70 years of age without diabetes (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.20-3.23; P = 0.007) and with diabetes (hazard ratio, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.16-3.09; P = 0.01) had higher mortality compared with the reference group. In absolute terms, SLK recipients ≥70 years of age had 25% lower patient survival at 5 years compared to recipients aged 40-49 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Although careful selection is required of any SLK recipient, especially those with increased comorbidities, there are no objective data to justify a specific age cutoff <70 years among potential SLK recipients with CKD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33215900      PMCID: PMC8721602          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  24 in total

1.  Liver transplantation in septuagenarians receiving model for end-stage liver disease exception points for hepatocellular carcinoma: the national experience.

Authors:  Jason Schwartz; Heather Thiesset; Terry Box; William Hutson; John Sorensen
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.799

2.   Simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation in elderly patients: Outcomes and validation of a clinical risk score for patient selection.

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; David D Lee; Justin M Burns; Dana K Perry; Justin H Nguyen; Andrew P Keaveny; Hani M Wadei; C Burcin Taner
Journal:  Ann Hepatol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec 2016       Impact factor: 2.400

3.  Impact of dialysis and older age on survival after liver transplantation.

Authors:  E S Dellon; J A Galanko; R K Medapalli; M W Russo
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Liver Transplantation for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in the US: Temporal Trends and Outcomes.

Authors:  George Cholankeril; Robert J Wong; Menghan Hu; Ryan B Perumpail; Eric R Yoo; Puneet Puri; Zobair M Younossi; Stephen A Harrison; Aijaz Ahmed
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Robert J Wong; Maria Aguilar; Ramsey Cheung; Ryan B Perumpail; Stephen A Harrison; Zobair M Younossi; Aijaz Ahmed
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Serum sodium and survival benefit of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Pratima Sharma; Douglas E Schaubel; Nathan P Goodrich; Robert M Merion
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 7.  Current Status of Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Erik L Lum; Andrés Cárdenas; Paul Martin; Suphamai Bunnapradist
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: a survey of US transplant centers.

Authors:  M K Nadim; C L Davis; R Sung; J A Kellum; Y S Genyk
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  NASH Leading Cause of Liver Transplant in Women: Updated Analysis of Indications For Liver Transplant and Ethnic and Gender Variances.

Authors:  Mazen Noureddin; Aarshi Vipani; Catherine Bresee; Tsuyoshi Todo; Irene K Kim; Naim Alkhouri; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Tram Tran; Walid S Ayoub; Shelly C Lu; Andrew S Klein; Vinay Sundaram; Nicholas N Nissen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 12.045

10.  Rising Rate of Liver Transplantation in the Baby Boomer Generation with Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis in the United States.

Authors:  Osama Siddique; Mairin Joseph-Talreja; Eric R Yoo; Ryan B Perumpail; George Cholankeril; Stephen A Harrison; Zobair M Younossi; Robert J Wong; Aijaz Ahmed
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2017-06-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Renal Outcomes After Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation: Results from the US Multicenter Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Consortium.

Authors:  Pratima Sharma; Zhiyu Sui; Min Zhang; John C Magee; Pranab Barman; Yuval Patel; Aaron Schluger; Kara Walter; Scott W Biggins; Giuseppe Cullaro; Randi Wong; Jennifer C Lai; Jennifer Jo; Jasmine Sinha; Lisa VanWagner; Elizabeth C Verna
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.112

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.