Literature DB >> 23618750

Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Qiang Huang1, Bin Shen, Jing Yang, Zong-ke Zhou, Peng-de Kang, Fu-xing Pei.   

Abstract

Our aim was to investigate the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) of acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A comparative study was carried out on 51 hips in 48 patients. Group A consisted of 25 patients (26 hips) who had undergone total hip resurfacing and group B consisted of 23 patients (25 hips) who had had large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA). BMDs around the acetabulum and proximal femur were measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and annually thereafter during the 3 years after surgery. At final follow-up, the acetabular net mean BMD decreased by 11% in group A and 10% in group B with no differences between two groups (P = .35). For the femoral side, in Gruen zone 1, the mean BMD increased by 4% in group A, whereas it decreased by 11% in group B (P = .029). In Gruen zone 7, the mean BMD increased by 8% at the final follow-up in group A, whereas it decreased by 13% in group B (P = .02). In both groups the mean BMD increased by 3% in Gruen zones 3, 4, 5, and 6. Stress-related bone loss of the acetabulum was comparable for MOM THA and resurfacing devices, but proximal femoral bone density increased in the resurfacing group and decreased in the THA group.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; total hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23618750     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Use of internal references for assessing CT density measurements of the pelvis as replacement for use of an external phantom.

Authors:  Martijn F Boomsma; Inge Slouwerhof; Jorn A van Dalen; Mireille A Edens; Dirk Mueller; Julien Milles; Mario Maas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Authors:  Robert Sershon; Rishi Balkissoon; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

3.  Inhibition Effect of Zoledronate on the Osteoclast Differentiation of RAW264.7 Induced by Titanium Particles.

Authors:  Wenhan Zhao; Zhusong Huang; Yu Lin; Jinfu Lan; Xi Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Bone mineral density changes in the graft after acetabular impaction bone grafting in primary and revision hip surgery.

Authors:  Davey M J M Gerhardt; Enrico De Visser; Baudewijn W Hendrickx; Berend W Schreurs; Job L C Van Susante
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Quantitative measurements of adaptive bone remodeling around the cemented Zimmer® segmental stem after tumor resection arthroplasty using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Christina Enciso Holm; Peter Horstmann; Michala Skovlund Sørensen; Karen Dyreborg; Michael Mørk Petersen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.