Literature DB >> 34090413

Quantitative measurements of adaptive bone remodeling around the cemented Zimmer® segmental stem after tumor resection arthroplasty using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Christina Enciso Holm1, Peter Horstmann2, Michala Skovlund Sørensen2, Karen Dyreborg2, Michael Mørk Petersen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage surgery (LSS) is the preferred method for treatment of patients with sarcomas and to a greater extent also to patients with metastatic bone disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the adaptive remodeling of the periprosthetic cortical bone after insertion of a tumor prosthesis with cemented stem.
METHODS: A prospective study of 21 patients (F/M = 12/9), mean age 55 years (range 15-81) with metastatic bone disease (n = 9), sarcomas (n = 8) or aggressive benign tumors (n = 4) who underwent bone resection due to a tumor, and reconstruction with a tumor-prosthesis (Zimmer® Segmental 130 mm straight fluted cemented stem with trabecular metal (TM) collars) in the proximal femur (n = 10), distal femur (n = 9) or proximal tibia (n = 2). Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) (g/cm2) were done postoperatively and after 3, 6, and 12 months using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD was measured in 4 regions of interest around the cemented stem and in one region of interest 1 cm proximal from the ankle joint of the affected limb and measurement of the contralateral ankle was used as reference. Repeated measures ANOVA and students paired t-test was used to evaluate BMD changes over time.
RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, BMD decreased compared to baseline in all four regions of interest with a statistically significant bone loss of 8-15%. The bone loss was most pronounced (14-15%) in the 2 regions of interest closest to the trabecular metal (TM) collar and lowest (8%) adjacent to the tip of the stem.
CONCLUSION: After 1 year the decrease in bone mineral density of the ankle on the affected limb was 9% and the contralateral ankle was close to baseline, thus suggesting that the periprosthetic bone mineral density changes during follow-up, mainly are caused by stress shielding and immobilization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (J. No. H-2-2014-105) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (J. No.: 2012-58-00004 ).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mass density; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Stress shielding; Tumor prostheses

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34090413     DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04395-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  15 in total

1.  Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling.

Authors:  J Kerner; R Huiskes; G H van Lenthe; H Weinans; B van Rietbergen; C A Engh; A A Amis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Adaptive Bone Remodeling of the Femoral Bone After Tumor Resection Arthroplasty With an Uncemented Proximally Hydroxyapatite-Coated Stem.

Authors:  Mikkel R Andersen; Michael M Petersen
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Zong-ke Zhou; Peng-de Kang; Fu-xing Pei
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Loss of bone mineral of the hip assessed by DEXA following tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  M M Petersen; P M Gehrchen; P K Nielsen; B Lund
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Continuous bone loss around a tapered uncemented femoral stem: a long-term evaluation with DEXA.

Authors:  Henrik S G Bodén; Olof G Sköldenberg; Mats O F Salemyr; Hans-Jerker Lundberg; Per Y Adolphson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Course of bone mineral content changes around cementless Zweymueller total hip arthroplasty. A 4-year follow-up study.

Authors:  P Korovessis; P Droutsas; G Piperos; A Michael; A Baikousis; M Stamatakis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Periprosthetic bone loss after cemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective 5-year dual energy radiographic absorptiometry study of 15 patients.

Authors:  Petri K Venesmaa; Heikki P J Kröger; Jukka S Jurvelin; Hannu J A Miettinen; Olavi T Suomalainen; Esko M Alhava
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-02

8.  Bone mineral density in the proximal femur and contralateral knee after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tarja A Soininvaara; Hannu J A Miettinen; Jukka S Jurvelin; Esko M Alhava; Heikki P J Kröger
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 9.  From amputation to limb salvage reconstruction: evolution and role of the endoprosthesis in musculoskeletal oncology.

Authors:  John S Hwang; Anokhi D Mehta; Richard S Yoon; Kathleen S Beebe
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-22

Review 10.  Megaprosthesis of the knee in tumor and revision surgery.

Authors:  E Pala; G Trovarelli; A Angelini; M Maraldi; A Berizzi; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2017-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.