Literature DB >> 28721636

Robotic colorectal surgery: previous laparoscopic colorectal experience is not essential.

Tanvir Singh Sian1, G M Tierney2, H Park2, J N Lund2,3, W J Speake2, N G Hurst2, H Al Chalabi2, K J Smith2, S Tou2.   

Abstract

A background in minimally invasive colorectal surgery (MICS) has been thought to be essential prior to robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RACS). Our aim was to determine whether MICS is essential prior to starting RACS training based on results from our initial experience with RACS. Two surgeons from our centre received robotic training through the European Academy of Robotic Colorectal Surgery (EARCS). One surgeon had no prior formal MICS training. We reviewed the first 30 consecutive robotic colorectal procedures from a prospectively maintained database between November 2014 and January 2016 at our institution. Fourteen patients were male. Median age was 64.5 years (range 36-82) and BMI was 27.5 (range 20-32.5). Twelve procedures (40%) were performed by the non-MICS-trained surgeon: ten high anterior resections (one conversion), one low anterior resection and one abdomino-perineal resection of rectum (APER). The MICS-trained surgeon performed nine high and four low anterior resections, one APER and in addition three right hemicolectomies and one abdominal suture rectopexy. There were no intra-operative complications and two patients required re-operation. Median post-operative stay was five days (range 1-26). There were two 30-day re-admissions. All oncological resections had clear margins and median node harvest was 18 (range 9-39). Our case series demonstrates that a background in MICS is not essential prior to starting RACS training. Not having prior MICS training should not discourage surgeons from considering applying for a robotic training programme. Safe and successful robotic colorectal services can be established after completing a formal structured robotic training programme.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopic training; Minimally invasive; Robotic surgery; Robotic training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28721636     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0728-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  18 in total

1.  Structured training in robotic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  S Tou; R Bergamaschi; R J Heald; A Parvaiz
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single center experience of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  O Stănciulea; M Eftimie; L David; V Tomulescu; C Vasilescu; I Popescu
Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

3.  Establishing a robotic colorectal surgery programme.

Authors:  Stephen Bell; Peter Carne; Martin Chin; Chip Farmer
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 4.  Robotic Colorectal Surgery: Advance or Expense?

Authors:  Rahila Essani; Roberto Bergamaschi
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2016-06-09

5.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

6.  Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.

Authors:  E Gorgun; V Ozben; M Costedio; L Stocchi; M Kalady; F Remzi
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Guixiang Liao; Zhihong Zhao; Shuhui Lin; Rong Li; Yawei Yuan; Shasha Du; Jiarong Chen; Haijun Deng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sawada; Hiroyuki Egi; Minoru Hattori; Takahisa Suzuki; Manabu Shimomura; Kazuaki Tanabe; Masazumi Okajima; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fiona J Collinson; David G Jayne; Alessio Pigazzi; Charles Tsang; Jennifer M Barrie; Richard Edlin; Christopher Garbett; Pierre Guillou; Ivana Holloway; Helen Howard; Helen Marshall; Christopher McCabe; Sue Pavitt; Phil Quirke; Carly S Rivers; Julia M B Brown
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  First 101 Robotic General Surgery Cases in a Community Hospital.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Oviedo; Jarrod C Robertson; Sharifah Alrajhi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Surgical Complexity and Outcome During the Implementation Phase of a Robotic Colorectal Surgery Program-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Catharina Müller; Johannes Laengle; Stefan Riss; Michael Bergmann; Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.