Literature DB >> 14519878

Solid breast masses diagnosed as fibroadenoma at fine-needle aspiration biopsy: acceptable rates of growth at long-term follow-up.

Paula B Gordon1, Faith A Gagnon, Leora Lanzkowsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine what growth rate is acceptable before recommending histologic diagnosis of solid breast lesions diagnosed as fibroadenoma at fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 1,070 consecutive patients with breast lesions diagnosed as fibroadenoma at FNAB, three measurements of each mass were performed at the initial visit when FNAB was performed and at each follow-up ultrasonographic examination. Changes in volumes were calculated. At one or more visits, 194 masses showed an increase in volume. Nonfibroadenomas were excluded, and the data were used for comparison. Percentiles (90th and 95th) for percentage change in volume per month were used to determine acceptable changes in dimensions (specifically, greatest anteroposterior, parallel-to-skin, and perpendicular-to-skin dimensions).
RESULTS: There were 567 interval measurements of 179 masses in 173 patients younger than 50 years and 50 measurements of 15 masses in 14 patients 50 years or older at the time of FNAB. The 95th percentile for percentage change in volume per month was approximately 16% for patients younger than 50 years; the 90th percentile was approximately 13% for patients 50 years or older. The 95th percentile mean change in dimension in a 6-month interval for those younger than 50 years was 20%; the 90th percentile change for those 50 years or older was also 20%. All excised masses with slower growth proved benign at histologic examination.
CONCLUSION: Solid breast masses diagnosed as fibroadenomas at FNAB may be safely followed up if volume growth rate is less than 16% per month in those younger than 50 years and less than 13% per month in those 50 years or older. Acceptable mean change in dimension for a 6-month interval is 20% for all ages. Copyright RSNA, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14519878     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2291010282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

1.  Solid breast mass characterisation: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification.

Authors:  M Costantini; P Belli; C Ierardi; G Franceschini; G La Torre; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Clinical breast concerns in low-risk pediatric patients: practice review with proposed recommendations.

Authors:  Linda M Sanders; Pinky Sharma; Miriam El Madany; Alexander B King; Koren S Goodman; Alison Esteva Sanders
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27

3.  Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Eun Young Chae; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Woo Jung Choi; Hak Hee Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Alan G Sechtin; Helga Marques; Zheng Zhang
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Interval growth of probably benign breast lesions on follow-up ultrasound: how can these be managed?

Authors:  Hee Jung Moon; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-up.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Unusual aggressive breast cancer: metastatic malignant phyllodes tumor.

Authors:  Adam Singer; Jonathan Tresley; Jose Velazquez-Vega; Monica Yepes
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2013-02-01

8.  Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: a study in clinical practice.

Authors:  James Majeski; Jason Stroud
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

10.  How to approach phyllodes tumors of the breast?

Authors:  Turan Acar; Ercüment Tarcan; Mehmet Hacıyanlı; Erdinç Kamer; Mustafa Peşkersoy; Seyran Yiğit; Özlem Gür; Necat Cin; Ayşegül Akder Sarı; Fatma Tatar
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.