OBJECTIVE: Using data collected for one series during 1987-1989 and data collected for another series during 1996, we sought to compare the frequency of and positive predictive value for carcinoma of the breast in nonpalpable, probably benign lesions that had been detected on and followed up with mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 1996, mammography was performed in 18,435 women of whom 544 (3.0%) had lesions assigned to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 for nonpalpable, probably benign lesions. The lesions in the women were assessed as BI-RADS category 3 after the patients had undergone a diagnostic study that included additional imaging, sonography, and a focused physical examination. Patients with BI-RADS category 3 lesions were recommended for mammographic surveillance. A minimum of 2 years of follow-up data was available for 511 patients, our study population. We compared the findings for our study population with those of the previous study. RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent of the follow-up mammograms showed stability or regression of the BI-RADS category 3 lesions. Fourteen patients (3%) had nonpalpable interval progression revealed on mammography and underwent biopsy. The breast cancer detection rate in category 3 lesions among the study population was 0.4% (2/511), which was 14% of the patients who had undergone biopsies because of interval progression of the lesions. The pathologic stage of the cancers in these two patients was T1b N0. CONCLUSION: Compared with the findings from the 1987-1989 study, the frequency of BI-RADS category 3 lesions has remained stable; patient compliance for follow-up has increased; and the positive predictive value of category 3 lesions for cancer has decreased from 1.7% to 0.4% (p = 0.04).
OBJECTIVE: Using data collected for one series during 1987-1989 and data collected for another series during 1996, we sought to compare the frequency of and positive predictive value for carcinoma of the breast in nonpalpable, probably benign lesions that had been detected on and followed up with mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 1996, mammography was performed in 18,435 women of whom 544 (3.0%) had lesions assigned to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 for nonpalpable, probably benign lesions. The lesions in the women were assessed as BI-RADS category 3 after the patients had undergone a diagnostic study that included additional imaging, sonography, and a focused physical examination. Patients with BI-RADS category 3 lesions were recommended for mammographic surveillance. A minimum of 2 years of follow-up data was available for 511 patients, our study population. We compared the findings for our study population with those of the previous study. RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent of the follow-up mammograms showed stability or regression of the BI-RADS category 3 lesions. Fourteen patients (3%) had nonpalpable interval progression revealed on mammography and underwent biopsy. The breast cancer detection rate in category 3 lesions among the study population was 0.4% (2/511), which was 14% of the patients who had undergone biopsies because of interval progression of the lesions. The pathologic stage of the cancers in these two patients was T1b N0. CONCLUSION: Compared with the findings from the 1987-1989 study, the frequency of BI-RADS category 3 lesions has remained stable; patient compliance for follow-up has increased; and the positive predictive value of category 3 lesions for cancer has decreased from 1.7% to 0.4% (p = 0.04).
Authors: Susan P Weinstein; Lucy G Hanna; Constantine Gatsonis; Mitchell D Schnall; Mark A Rosen; Constance D Lehman Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Amy Lynn Conners; Carrie B Hruska; Cindy L Tortorelli; Robert W Maxwell; Deborah J Rhodes; Judy C Boughey; Wendie A Berg Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Carrie B Hruska; Amy Lynn Conners; Katie N Jones; Michael K O'Connor; James P Moriarty; Judy C Boughey; Deborah J Rhodes Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.959