Literature DB >> 23616172

[Active surveillance: concept for renal cell carcinoma?].

I Tsaur1, D Schilling, A Haferkamp.   

Abstract

More than 80% of renal cell carcinomas are currently being detected incidentally by ultrasonic imaging and often affect elderly patients with substantial comorbidities. Surgical options cannot be applied in this cohort as routinely as in younger patients, as in some cases the perioperative risk factors may outweigh the risk of tumor-related death. In this context the concept of active surveillance for localized renal cell cancer in elderly patients is becoming increasingly important. The aim of active surveillance is to avoid surgery-related adverse effects and to achieve a controlled observation of tumor behavior with an option of delayed intervention in cases of aggressive clinical tumor features. This review sheds light on the current status of this strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23616172     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-013-3197-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  43 in total

1.  Watchful waiting for solid renal masses: insight into the natural history and results of delayed intervention.

Authors:  Erik Kouba; Angela Smith; Daniel McRackan; Eric M Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Small renal cell carcinoma: oncological outcome with tumour size.

Authors:  Sascha Pahernik; Johannes Huber; Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Axel Haferkamp; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-10-24

3.  Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Active treatment of localized renal tumors may not impact overall survival in patients aged 75 years or older.

Authors:  Brian R Lane; Robert Abouassaly; Tianming Gao; Christopher J Weight; Adrian V Hernandez; Benjamin T Larson; Jihad H Kaouk; Inderbir S Gill; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Overall mortality after radical nephrectomy in patients aged over 80 years with renal cancer: a retrospective study on preoperative prognostic factors.

Authors:  Elena Brassart; Souhil Lebdai; Julien Berger; Sory Traore; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Tarek Fardoun; Guillaume Muller; Jean-Jacques Patard; Abdel Rahmène Azzouzi; Pierre Bigot
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  Can we avoid surgery in elderly patients with renal masses by using the Charlson comorbidity index?

Authors:  Kevin M O'Connor; Niall Davis; Gerry M Lennon; David M Quinlan; David W Mulvin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Observation should be considered as an alternative in management of renal masses in older and comorbid patients.

Authors:  Christian Beisland; Karin M Hjelle; Lars A R Reisaeter; Leif Bostad
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  The growth rate of large renal masses opposes active surveillance.

Authors:  Michael Staehler; Nicolas Haseke; Thomas Stadler; Ekaterina Zilinberg; Cordula Nordhaus; Philip Nuhn; Wael Y Khoder; Alexander Karl; Christian G Stief
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Renal tumor biopsies for evaluation of small renal tumors: why, in whom, and how?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Michael Marberger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Survival analysis of clear cell renal carcinoma according to the Charlson comorbidity index.

Authors:  Daniel Santos Arrontes; María Jesús Fernández Aceñero; Jesús Isidoro García González; Manuel Martín Muñoz; Pedro Paniagua Andrés
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.