BACKGROUND: Renal masses diagnosed in older and comorbid patients represent a challenge with regard to treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcome and tumor progression in patients with renal masses managed by observation due to age and comorbidity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The medical records of 63 consecutive patients with renal masses primarily managed by observation during 2002-2007 were reviewed retrospectively and analyzed. The mean age for all patients at diagnosis was 76.6 yr, and 59% were male. Mean tumor size was 4.3 cm in diameter at diagnosis. Of these, 30% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 2 or 3, 78% were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3, and the patients had a mean of 2.8 other medical conditions. MEASUREMENTS: Registration of age, ASA class, PS, comorbid conditions, computed tomography scans, primary tumor size, tumor growth rate, pathology parameters, observation time, survival time. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Five-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 42.8% and 93.3%, respectively. For tumors < or =4.0 cm in size, 5-yr CSS was 100%. Nine patients received delayed radical treatment, none of whom had later progression of the disease. In 18 patients histopathologic diagnosis of the renal masses were available, and in 15 patients (83%) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was verified. The annual growth rate was <1cm/yr in 85.4% of the cases. In tumors < or =4.0 cm, only 1 of 27 tumors (3.7%) grew faster than 1cm/yr. CONCLUSIONS: Management of renal masses by observation among older and comorbid patients seems to give acceptable results with regard to OS and CSS rates after 5 yr. The risk of disease progression is significantly higher in patients with larger sized renal masses (>4 cm). Thus, selection for observation in this group has to be stricter than in a group of patients with smaller sized renal masses (< or =4.0 cm).
BACKGROUND: Renal masses diagnosed in older and comorbid patients represent a challenge with regard to treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcome and tumor progression in patients with renal masses managed by observation due to age and comorbidity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The medical records of 63 consecutive patients with renal masses primarily managed by observation during 2002-2007 were reviewed retrospectively and analyzed. The mean age for all patients at diagnosis was 76.6 yr, and 59% were male. Mean tumor size was 4.3 cm in diameter at diagnosis. Of these, 30% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 2 or 3, 78% were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3, and the patients had a mean of 2.8 other medical conditions. MEASUREMENTS: Registration of age, ASA class, PS, comorbid conditions, computed tomography scans, primary tumor size, tumor growth rate, pathology parameters, observation time, survival time. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Five-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 42.8% and 93.3%, respectively. For tumors < or =4.0 cm in size, 5-yr CSS was 100%. Nine patients received delayed radical treatment, none of whom had later progression of the disease. In 18 patients histopathologic diagnosis of the renal masses were available, and in 15 patients (83%) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was verified. The annual growth rate was <1cm/yr in 85.4% of the cases. In tumors < or =4.0 cm, only 1 of 27 tumors (3.7%) grew faster than 1cm/yr. CONCLUSIONS: Management of renal masses by observation among older and comorbid patients seems to give acceptable results with regard to OS and CSS rates after 5 yr. The risk of disease progression is significantly higher in patients with larger sized renal masses (>4 cm). Thus, selection for observation in this group has to be stricter than in a group of patients with smaller sized renal masses (< or =4.0 cm).
Authors: Marc C Smaldone; Alexander Kutikov; Brian L Egleston; Daniel J Canter; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Michael A Jewett; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860