Literature DB >> 29073583

Divergent oestrogen receptor-specific breast cancer trends in Ireland (2004-2013): Amassing data from independent Western populations provide etiologic clues.

Maeve Mullooly1, Jeanne Murphy2, Gretchen L Gierach3, Paul M Walsh4, Sandra Deady4, Thomas I Barron5, Mark E Sherman6, Philip S Rosenberg3, William F Anderson3.   

Abstract

The aetiology and clinical behaviour of breast cancers vary by oestrogen receptor (ER) expression, HER2 expression and over time. Data from the United States and Denmark show rising incidence rates for ER+ and falling incidence rates for ER- breast cancers. Given that Ireland is a somewhat similar Western population but with distinctive risk exposures (especially for lactation), we analysed breast cancer trends by ER status; and for the first time, by the joint expression of ER±/HER2±. We assessed invasive breast cancers (n = 24,845; 2004-2013) within the population-based National Cancer Registry of Ireland. The population at risk was obtained from the Irish Central Statistics Office (n = 10,401,986). After accounting for missing ER and HER2 data, we assessed receptor-specific secular trends in age-standardised incidence rates (ASRs) with the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Age-period-cohort models were also fitted to further characterise trends accounting for age, calendar-period and birth-cohort interactions. ASRs increased for ER+ (EAPC: 2.2% per year [95% CI: 0.97, 3.45%/year]) and decreased for ER- cancers (EAPC: -3.43% per year [95% CI: -5.05, -1.78%/year]), as well as for specific age groups at diagnosis (<30-49, 50-64 and ≥65 years). ER+/HER2- cancers rose, ER+/HER2+ cancers were statistically flat and ER-/HER± cancers declined. Secular trends for ER± cancers in Ireland were like those previously observed. Stratification by HER2± expression did not substantively alter ER± trends. The divergence of ER± incidence rates among independent Western populations likely reflects calendar-period and/or risk factor changes with differential effects for ER+ and ER- breast cancers. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; HER2; Incidence rates; Oestrogen receptor; Secular trends

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29073583      PMCID: PMC5841549          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  29 in total

1.  Effect of clinical trial publicity on HRT prescribing in Ireland.

Authors:  C Usher; M Teeling; K Bennett; J Feely
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  How many etiological subtypes of breast cancer: two, three, four, or more?

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers.

Authors:  F D Gilliland; N Joste; P M Stauber; W C Hunt; R Rosenberg; G Redlich; C R Key
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Trends in breast cancer aggressiveness before the introduction of mass screening in southeastern Netherlands 1975-1989.

Authors:  W J Louwman; P J van Diest; M W P M van Beek; R F M Schapers; M B C J E Tutein Nolthenius-Puylaert; J P A Baak; J W W Coebergh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Tracking and evaluating molecular tumor markers with cancer registry data: HER2 and breast cancer.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Divergent estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer trends and etiologic heterogeneity in Denmark.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Lucia Petito; Hormuzd A Katki; Bent Ejlertsen; Marianne Ewertz; Birgitte B Rasmussen; Maj-Britt Jensen; Niels Kroman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Association of hormone replacement therapy to estrogen and progesterone receptor status in invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Wendy Y Chen; Susan E Hankinson; Stuart J Schnitt; Bernard A Rosner; Michelle D Holmes; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Andrew G Glass; James V Lacey; J Daniel Carreon; Robert N Hoover
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Breastfeeding and breast cancer risk by receptor status--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Islami; Y Liu; A Jemal; J Zhou; E Weiderpass; G Colditz; P Boffetta; M Weiss
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk according to joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Huiyan Ma; Leslie Bernstein; Malcolm C Pike; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

1.  Breast cancer incidence and survival in Scotland by socio-economic deprivation and tumour subtype.

Authors:  Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray; Sarah H Wild; Sheila M Bird; Linda J Williams; David H Brewster; Peter S Hall; Jonine D Figueroa
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.624

2.  Pooled Analysis of Nine Cohorts Reveals Breast Cancer Risk Factors by Tumor Molecular Subtype.

Authors:  Mia M Gaudet; Gretchen L Gierach; Brian D Carter; Juhua Luo; Roger L Milne; Elisabete Weiderpass; Graham G Giles; Rulla M Tamimi; A Heather Eliassen; Bernard Rosner; Alicja Wolk; Hans-Olov Adami; Karen L Margolis; Susan M Gapstur; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Breast cancer biomarkers in clinical testing: analysis of a UK national external quality assessment scheme for immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridisation database containing results from 199 300 patients.

Authors:  Andrew Dodson; Suzanne Parry; Merdol Ibrahim; John Ms Bartlett; Sarah Pinder; Mitch Dowsett; Keith Miller
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2018-09-21

4.  Distinct temporal trends in breast cancer incidence from 1997 to 2016 by molecular subtypes: a population-based study of Scottish cancer registry data.

Authors:  Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray; Sarah H Wild; Philip S Rosenberg; Sheila M Bird; David H Brewster; Peter S Hall; David A Cameron; David Morrison; Jonine D Figueroa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  A rapid rise in hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer subtypes in Southern Thai women: A population-based study in Songkhla.

Authors:  Aungkana Chuaychai; Hutcha Sriplung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Activatable "Matryoshka" nanosystem delivery NgBR siRNA and control drug release for stepwise therapy and evaluate drug resistance cancer.

Authors:  Xinzhi Xu; Chunxiang Jin; Kai Zhang; Yang Cao; Junjun Liu; Yue Zhang; Haitao Ran; Ying Jin
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-03-19

7.  Divergent breast cancer incidence trends by hormone receptor status in the state of Sarawak, Malaysia.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Beena C R Devi; Tieng S Tang; Philip S Rosenberg; William F Anderson; Xiaohong R Yang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 7.316

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.