Literature DB >> 17893881

Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening.

My von Euler-Chelpin1, Anne Helene Olsen, Sisse Njor, Ilse Vejborg, Walter Schwartz, Elsebeth Lynge.   

Abstract

Our objective was to use individual data on socio-demographic characteristics to identify predictors of participation in mammography screening and control to what extent they can explain the regional difference. We used data from mammography screening programmes in Copenhagen, 1991-1999, and Funen, 1993-2001, Denmark. Target groups were identified from the Population Register, screening data came from the health authority, and socio-demographic data from Statistics Denmark. Included were women eligible for at least 3 screens. The crude RR of never use versus always use was 3.21 (95%CI, 3.07-3.35) for Copenhagen versus Funen, and the adjusted RR was 2.55 (95%CI, 2.43-2.67). The adjusted RR for never use among women without contact to a primary care physician was 2.50 (95% CI, 2.31-2.71) and 2.89 (95% CI, 2.66-3.14), and for women without dental care 2.94 (95% CI, 2.77-3.12) and 2.88 (95% CI, 2.68-3.10) for Copenhagen and Funen, respectively. Other important predictive factors for nonparticipation were not being married and not being Danish. In conclusion, to enhance participation in mammography screening programmes special attention needs to be given to women not using other primary health care services. All women in Copenhagen, irrespective of their socio-demographic characteristics, had low participation. Screening programmes have to find ways to handle this urbanity factor. Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17893881     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  22 in total

1.  Mammography use for breast cancer screening in Portugal: results from the 2005/2006 National Health Survey.

Authors:  Fernanda Dourado; Helena Carreira; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Socioeconomic status as determinant for participation in mammography screening: assessing the difference between using women's own versus their partner's.

Authors:  Malin Kjellén; My von Euler-Chelpin
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  The effects of organized screening programs on the demand for mammography in Switzerland.

Authors:  Mark Pletscher
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-11-08

4.  Divergent estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer trends and etiologic heterogeneity in Denmark.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Lucia Petito; Hormuzd A Katki; Bent Ejlertsen; Marianne Ewertz; Birgitte B Rasmussen; Maj-Britt Jensen; Niels Kroman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Socioeconomic position and participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  B L Frederiksen; T Jørgensen; K Brasso; I Holten; M Osler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast Medical Tactile Examiners (MTEs): A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Julius Emons; Mayada R Bani; Marius Wunderle; Charlotte Sell; Caroline Preuss; Claudia Rauh; Sebastian M Jud; Felix Heindl; Hanna Langemann; Thomas Geyer; Anna-Lisa Brandl; Carolin C Hack; Werner Adler; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Paul Gass
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sophie Sell Hellmann; Sisse Helle Njor; Elsebeth Lynge; My von Euler-Chelpin; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjønneland; Ilse Vejborg; Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening--population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography.

Authors:  Line Flytkjær Jensen; Anette Fischer Pedersen; Berit Andersen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Mammographic density in birth cohorts of Danish women: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Sophie Sell Hellmann; Elsebeth Lynge; Walter Schwartz; Ilse Vejborg; Sisse Helle Njor
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Birth weight, childhood body mass index, and height in relation to mammographic density and breast cancer: a register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Zorana J Andersen; Jennifer L Baker; Kristine Bihrmann; Ilse Vejborg; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.