Literature DB >> 23614853

Intensity-dependent modulatory effects of vagus nerve stimulation on cortical excitability.

L Mollet1, A Grimonprez, R Raedt, J Delbeke, R El Tahry, V De Herdt, A Meurs, W Wadman, P Boon, K Vonck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an effective treatment for refractory epilepsy. It remains unknown whether VNS efficacy is dependent on output current intensity. The present study investigated the effect of various VNS output current intensities on cortical excitability in the motor cortex stimulation rat model. The hypothesis was that output current intensities in the lower range are sufficient to significantly affect cortical excitability.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: VNS at four output current intensities (0 mA, 0.25 mA, 0.5 mA and 1 mA) was randomly administered in rats (n = 15) on four consecutive days. Per output current intensity, the animals underwent five-one-hour periods: (i) baseline, (ii) VNS1, (iii) wash-out1, (iv) VNS2 and (v) wash-out2. After each one-hour period, the motor seizure threshold (MST) was measured and compared to baseline (i.e. ∆MSTbaseline , ∆MSTVNS 1 , ∆MSTwash-out1 , ∆MSTVNS 2 and ∆MSTwash-out2 ). Finally, the mean ∆MSTbaseline , mean ∆MSTwash-out1 , mean ∆MSTwash-out2 and mean ∆MSTVNS per VNS output current intensity were calculated.
RESULTS: No differences were found between the mean ∆MSTbaseline , mean ∆MSTwash-out1 and mean ∆MSTwash-out2 within each VNS output current intensity. The mean ∆MSTVNS at 0 mA, 0.25 mA, 0.5 mA and 1 mA was 15.3 ± 14.6 μA, 101.8 ± 23.5 μA, 108.1 ± 24.4 μA and 85.7 ± 18.1 μA respectively. The mean ∆MSTVNS at 0.25 mA, 0.5 mA and 1 mA were significantly larger compared to the mean ∆MSTVNS at 0 mA (P = 0.002 for 0.25 mA; P = 0.001 for 0.5 mA; P = 0.011 for 1 mA).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms efficacy of VNS in the motor cortex stimulation rat model and indicates that, of the output current intensities tested, 0.25 mA is sufficient to decrease cortical excitability and higher output current intensities may not be required.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epilepsy; motor cortex stimulation rat model; stimulation parameters; vagus nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23614853     DOI: 10.1111/ane.12135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6314            Impact factor:   3.209


  4 in total

1.  Transcutaneous Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation Ameliorates Acute Ischemic Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Ilknur Ay; Rena Nasser; Bruce Simon; Hakan Ay
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve dermatome in the external ear is protective in rat cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Ilknur Ay; Vitaly Napadow; Hakan Ay
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Applied with a Rapid Cycle Has More Profound Influence on Hippocampal Electrophysiology Than a Standard Cycle.

Authors:  Lars E Larsen; Wytse J Wadman; Daniele Marinazzo; Pieter van Mierlo; Jean Delbeke; Sofie Daelemans; Mathieu Sprengers; Lisa Thyrion; Wouter Van Lysebettens; Evelien Carrette; Paul Boon; Kristl Vonck; Robrecht Raedt
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  The human phrenic nerve serves as a morphological conduit for autonomic nerves and innervates the caval body of the diaphragm.

Authors:  Thomas J M Verlinden; Paul van Dijk; Andreas Herrler; Corrie de Gier-de Vries; Wouter H Lamers; S Eleonore Köhler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.