Literature DB >> 27102987

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Applied with a Rapid Cycle Has More Profound Influence on Hippocampal Electrophysiology Than a Standard Cycle.

Lars E Larsen1, Wytse J Wadman2, Daniele Marinazzo3, Pieter van Mierlo4,5, Jean Delbeke4, Sofie Daelemans4, Mathieu Sprengers4, Lisa Thyrion4, Wouter Van Lysebettens4, Evelien Carrette4, Paul Boon4, Kristl Vonck4, Robrecht Raedt4.   

Abstract

Although vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is widely used, therapeutic mechanisms and optimal stimulation parameters remain elusive. In the present study, we investigated the effect of VNS on hippocampal field activity and compared the efficiency of different VNS paradigms. Hippocampal electroencephalography (EEG) and perforant path dentate field-evoked potentials were acquired before and during VNS in freely moving rats, using 2 VNS duty cycles: a rapid cycle (7 s on, 18 s off) and standard cycle (30 s on, 300 s off) and various output currents. VNS modulated the evoked potentials, reduced total power of the hippocampal EEG, and slowed the theta rhythm. In the hippocampal EEG, theta (4-8 Hz) and high gamma (75-150 Hz) activity displayed strong phase amplitude coupling that was reduced by VNS. Rapid-cycle VNS had a greater effect than standard-cycle VNS on all outcome measures. Using rapid cycle VNS, a maximal effect on EEG parameters was found at 300 μA, beyond which effects saturated. The findings suggest that rapid-cycle VNS produces a more robust outcome than standard cycle VNS and support already existing preclinical evidence that relatively low output currents are sufficient to produce changes in brain physiology and thus likely also therapeutic efficacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dentate gyrus; EEG; Evoked potential; Phase amplitude coupling; Stimulation parameters; Vagus nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27102987      PMCID: PMC4965402          DOI: 10.1007/s13311-016-0432-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotherapeutics        ISSN: 1878-7479            Impact factor:   7.620


  36 in total

Review 1.  Vagus-nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  Elinor Ben-Menachem
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  The effect of vagal afferent stimulation on the EEG pattern of the cat.

Authors:  A ZANCHETTI; S C WANG; G MORUZZI
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1952-08

3.  Vagus nerve stimulation potentiates hippocampal LTP in freely-moving rats.

Authors:  Yantao Zuo; Douglas C Smith; Robert A Jensen
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-01-03

4.  Physiological identification and analysis of dentate granule cell responses to stimulation of the medial and lateral perforant pathways in the rat.

Authors:  B L McNaughton; C A Barnes
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1977-10-15       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Modulation of Hippocampal Activity by Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Freely Moving Rats.

Authors:  Lars Emil Larsen; Wytse Jan Wadman; Pieter van Mierlo; Jean Delbeke; Annelies Grimonprez; Bregt Van Nieuwenhuyse; Jeanelle Portelli; Paul Boon; Kristl Vonck; Robrecht Raedt
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Enhanced recognition memory following vagus nerve stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  K B Clark; D K Naritoku; D C Smith; R A Browning; R A Jensen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Vagus nerve stimulation modulates cortical synchrony and excitability through the activation of muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  J A Nichols; A R Nichols; S M Smirnakis; N D Engineer; M P Kilgard; M Atzori
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Nikolai Axmacher; Melanie M Henseler; Ole Jensen; Ilona Weinreich; Christian E Elger; Juergen Fell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Intensity-dependent modulatory effects of vagus nerve stimulation on cortical excitability.

Authors:  L Mollet; A Grimonprez; R Raedt; J Delbeke; R El Tahry; V De Herdt; A Meurs; W Wadman; P Boon; K Vonck
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.209

10.  Vagus nerve stimulation for depression: efficacy and safety in a European study.

Authors:  T E Schlaepfer; C Frick; A Zobel; W Maier; I Heuser; M Bajbouj; V O'Keane; C Corcoran; R Adolfsson; M Trimble; H Rau; H-J Hoff; F Padberg; F Müller-Siecheneder; K Audenaert; D Van den Abbeele; K Matthews; D Christmas; Z Stanga; M Hasdemir
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  6 in total

1.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Rapid versus Slow Cycling in a Laboratory Model.

Authors:  Robert S Fisher
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Invasive Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Pediatric Epilepsy.

Authors:  Laureen D Hachem; Han Yan; George M Ibrahim
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Medial septal cholinergic mediation of hippocampal theta rhythm induced by vagal nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Adam Broncel; Renata Bocian; Paulina Kłos-Wojtczak; Jan Konopacki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Human intracranial recordings reveal distinct cortical activity patterns during invasive and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Kirill V Nourski; Ariane E Rhone; Matthew A Howard; Edward F Chang; Matthew K Leonard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Vagal nerve stimulation triggers widespread responses and alters large-scale functional connectivity in the rat brain.

Authors:  Jiayue Cao; Kun-Han Lu; Terry L Powley; Zhongming Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Altered amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and regional homogeneity in drug-resistant epilepsy patients with vagal nerve stimulators under different current intensity.

Authors:  Jin Zhu; Cuiping Xu; Xi Zhang; Liang Qiao; Xueyuan Wang; Xiaohua Zhang; Xiaoming Yan; Duanyu Ni; Tao Yu; Guojun Zhang; Yongjie Li
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 5.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.