Literature DB >> 26723020

Transcutaneous Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation Ameliorates Acute Ischemic Injury in Rats.

Ilknur Ay1, Rena Nasser2, Bruce Simon3, Hakan Ay4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Direct stimulation of the vagus nerve in the neck via surgically implanted electrodes is protective in animal models of stroke. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of a non-invasive cervical VNS (nVNS) method using surface electrodes applied to the skin overlying the vagus nerve in the neck in a model of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO).
METHODS: nVNS was initiated variable times after MCAO in rats (n = 33). Control animals received sham stimulation (n = 33). Infarct volume and functional outcome were assessed on day 7. Brains were processed by immunohistochemistry for microglial activation and cytokine levels. The ability of nVNS to activate the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) was assessed using c-Fos immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: Infarct volume was 43.15 ± 3.36 percent of the contralateral hemisphere (PCH) in control and 28.75 ± 4.22 PCH in nVNS-treated animals (p < 0.05). The effect of nVNS on infarct size was consistent when stimulation was initiated up to 4 hours after MCAO. There was no difference in heart rate and blood pressure between control and nVNS-treated animals. The number of c-Fos positive cells was 32.4 ± 10.6 and 6.2 ± 6.3 in the ipsilateral NTS (p < 0.05) and 30.4 ± 11.2 and 5.8 ± 4.3 in the contralateral NTS (p < 0.05) in nVNS-treated and control animals, respectively. nVNS reduced the number of Iba-1, CD68, and TNF-α positive cells and increased the number of HMGB1 positive cells.
CONCLUSIONS: nVNS inhibits ischemia-induced immune activation and reduces the extent of tissue injury and functional deficit in rats without causing cardiac or hemodynamic adverse effects when initiated up to 4 hours after MCAO.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral ischemia; Electrical stimulation; Inflammation; Neuroprotection; Vagus nerve

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26723020      PMCID: PMC4789082          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  34 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of immunohistochemistry--issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment II.

Authors:  C R Taylor; R M Levenson
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Physiology and immunology of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway.

Authors:  Kevin J Tracey
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve enhances cognitive and motor recovery following moderate fluid percussion injury in the rat.

Authors:  Douglas C Smith; Arlene A Modglin; Rodney W Roosevelt; Steven L Neese; Robert A Jensen; Ronald A Browning; Richard W Clough
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Two types of vagal preganglionic motoneurones projecting to the heart and lungs.

Authors:  R M McAllen; K M Spyer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Cholinergic agonists inhibit HMGB1 release and improve survival in experimental sepsis.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Hong Liao; Mahendar Ochani; Marilou Justiniani; Xinchun Lin; Lihong Yang; Yousef Al-Abed; Haichao Wang; Christine Metz; Edmund J Miller; Kevin J Tracey; Luis Ulloa
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-10-24       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Brain stem projections of sensory and motor components of the vagus complex in the cat: I. The cervical vagus and nodose ganglion.

Authors:  M Kalia; M M Mesulam
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1980-09-15       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Electrical stimulation of cerebellar fastigial nucleus reduces ischemic infarction elicited by middle cerebral artery occlusion in rat.

Authors:  D J Reis; S B Berger; M D Underwood; M Khayata
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats.

Authors:  E Z Longa; P R Weinstein; S Carlson; R Cummins
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Rat middle cerebral artery occlusion: evaluation of the model and development of a neurologic examination.

Authors:  J B Bederson; L H Pitts; M Tsuji; M C Nishimura; R L Davis; H Bartkowski
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Locus coeruleus lesions suppress the seizure-attenuating effects of vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  S E Krahl; K B Clark; D C Smith; R A Browning
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.864

View more
  27 in total

1.  Low-level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation attenuates cardiac remodelling in a rat model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Liping Zhou; Adrian Filiberti; Mary Beth Humphrey; Christian D Fleming; Benjamin J Scherlag; Sunny S Po; Stavros Stavrakis
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.969

2.  Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation Prevents Ruptures and Improves Outcomes in a Model of Intracranial Aneurysm in Mice.

Authors:  Tomoaki Suzuki; Tsubasa Takizawa; Yoshinobu Kamio; Tao Qin; Tomoki Hashimoto; Yukihiko Fujii; Yuichi Murayama; Aman B Patel; Cenk Ayata
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Intraoperative Vagus Nerve Stimulation Accelerates Postoperative Recovery in Rats.

Authors:  Haruaki Murakami; Shiying Li; Robert Foreman; Jieyun Yin; Toshihiro Hirai; Jiande D Z Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Inflammation: Systematic Review of Animal Models and Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Harwood Kwan; Luca Garzoni; Hai Lun Liu; Mingju Cao; Andre Desrochers; Gilles Fecteau; Patrick Burns; Martin G Frasch
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2016-09-14

Review 5.  Bioelectronic Approaches to Control Neuroimmune Interactions in Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Inoue; Shinji Tanaka; Diane L Rosin; Mark D Okusa
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 6.  The Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Interfaces.

Authors:  Dayo O Adewole; Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Justin C Burrell; Dmitriy Petrov; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016

Review 7.  Targeting neural reflex circuits in immunity to treat kidney disease.

Authors:  Mark D Okusa; Diane L Rosin; Kevin J Tracey
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 8.  Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation: From Concept to Application.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Shao-Yuan Li; Dan Wang; Mo-Zheng Wu; Jia-Kai He; Jin-Ling Zhang; Bin Zhao; Li-Wei Hou; Jun-Ying Wang; Lei Wang; Yi-Fei Wang; Yue Zhang; Zi-Xuan Zhang; Pei-Jing Rong
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 5.271

9.  Inflammatory Mechanisms Associated with Skeletal Muscle Sequelae after Stroke: Role of Physical Exercise.

Authors:  Hélio José Coelho Junior; Bruno Bavaresco Gambassi; Tiego Aparecido Diniz; Isabela Maia da Cruz Fernandes; Érico Chagas Caperuto; Marco Carlos Uchida; Fabio Santos Lira; Bruno Rodrigues
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 10.  High-Resolution Multi-Scale Computational Model for Non-Invasive Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Dennis Q Truong; Devin K Adair; Bruce J Simon; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.