Literature DB >> 23614845

A comparison of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors worn at the same time.

Radhakrishna R Kallem1, Kevin E C Meyers, Deirdre L Sawinski, Raymond R Townsend.   

Abstract

There are limited data in the literature comparing two simultaneously worn ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) devices. The authors compared BPs from two monitors (Mobil-O-Graph [I.E.M., Stolberg, Germany] and Spacelabs 90207 [Spacelabs Medical, Issequah, WA]). In the nonrandomized component of the study, simultaneous 8-hour BP and heart rate data were measured by Mobil-O-Graph, consistently applied to the nondominant arm, and Spacelabs to the dominant arm on 12 untreated adults. Simultaneous 8-hour BP and heart data were obtained by the same monitors randomly assigned to a dominant or nondominant arm on 12 other untreated adults. Oscillometric BP profiles were obtained in the dominant and nondominant arms of the above 24 patients using an Accutorr (Datascope, Mahwah, NJ) device. The Spacelabs monitor recorded a 10.2-mm Hg higher systolic pressure in the nonrandomized (P=.0016) and a 7.9-mm Hg higher systolic pressure in the randomized studies (P=.00008) compared with the Mobil-O-Graph. The mean arterial pressures were 1 mm Hg to 2 mm Hg different between monitors in the two studies, and heart rates were nearly identical. Our observations, if confirmed in larger cohorts, support the concern that ABPM device manufacturers consider developing normative databases for their devices. ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23614845      PMCID: PMC8033815          DOI: 10.1111/jch.12098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  17 in total

1.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: which arm?

Authors:  J C O'Shea; M B Murphy
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 2.  Clinical Advisory Statement. Importance of systolic blood pressure in older Americans.

Authors:  J L Izzo; D Levy; H R Black
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Letter: Hypertension--which arm?

Authors:  R A Swallow
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-08-09

4.  Validation of the SpaceLabs 90202 and 90207 devices for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring by comparison with intra-arterial resting and ambulatory measurements.

Authors:  A Groppelli; S Omboni; A Ravogli; A Villani; G Parati; G Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1991-12

5.  Validation of the mobil-O-Graph: 24 h-blood pressure measurement device.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wei; Markus Tölle; Walter Zidek; Markus van der Giet
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.444

6.  Interarm differences in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure: the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network study.

Authors:  Donna K Arnett; Weihong Tang; Michael A Province; Albert Oberman; R Curtis Ellison; Derek Morgan; John H Eckfeldt; Steven C Hunt
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Diagnostic thresholds for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring based on 10-year cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Masahiro Kikuya; Tine W Hansen; Lutgarde Thijs; Kristina Björklund-Bodegård; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Tom Richart; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Lars Lind; Hans Ibsen; Yutaka Imai; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: Executive Summary. A joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of 3 Devices for 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in a Nonclinical Environment Through a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Tatiana Nwankwo; Sallyann M Coleman King; Yechiam Ostchega; Guangyu Zhang; Fleetwood Loustalot; Cathleen Gillespie; Tiffany E Chang; Elin B Begley; Mary G George; Daichi Shimbo; Joseph E Schwartz; Paul Muntner; Ian M Kronish; Yuling Hong; Robert Merritt
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  Integrating Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  Jordana B Cohen; Debbie L Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  A comparison study of brachial blood pressure recorded with Spacelabs 90217A and Mobil-O-Graph NG devices under static and ambulatory conditions.

Authors:  P A Sarafidis; A A Lazaridis; K P Imprialos; P I Georgianos; K A Avranas; A D Protogerou; M N Doumas; V G Athyros; A I Karagiannis
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  A study of the VaSera arterial stiffness device in US patients.

Authors:  George Maliha; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Assessing the accuracy of the OMRON HEM-907XL oscillometric blood pressure measurement device in patients with nondialytic chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Jordana B Cohen; Tiffany C Wong; Bruce S Alpert; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  A comparison of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors worn at the same time.

Authors:  Radhakrishna R Kallem; Kevin E C Meyers; Deirdre L Sawinski; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  What is the truth? Differences in ambulatory blood pressure data between monitors.

Authors:  Michiaki Nagai; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.