Melanie Jarvis1, Katelyn J Guy, Kai König. 1. Department of Paediatrics, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. mjarvis_1@hotmail.com
Abstract
AIM: To study the impact on newborn behavioural states and accuracy of three infrared thermometers compared with digital axillary thermometer measurements in very low birth weight infants. METHODS: Single-centre prospective observational study. Preterm infants born <1500-g birth weight were eligible. Infants were observed for pre-measurement behaviour state using a five-point neonatal behaviour observation tool. One infrared temperature was taken from each of the devices, followed by an axillary measurement. Further behaviour-state observations were recorded following infrared and axillary measurements. RESULTS: One hundred measurements were collected from each infrared device among a cohort of 42 very low birth weight infants. Only one infrared device showed satisfactory agreement with bias -0.071 (95% limits of agreement -0.68 to 0.54). The other two devices demonstrated poor agreement: bias -1.34; 95% limits of agreement -2.62 to -0.5 and bias -0.56; 95% limits of agreement -1.38 to 0.25. Neonatal behavioural scores showed only minimal changes when infrared measurements were performed but increased significantly following axillary measurements. The difference between the two modalities was statistically significant with a mean increase of 1.44 points following axillary measurements (95% confidence interval 1.21 to 1.67, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Temperature measurements taken with infrared thermometers demonstrated less disruption to preterm infants' behavioural state, however accuracy of devices varied.
AIM: To study the impact on newborn behavioural states and accuracy of three infrared thermometers compared with digital axillary thermometer measurements in very low birth weight infants. METHODS: Single-centre prospective observational study. Preterm infants born <1500-g birth weight were eligible. Infants were observed for pre-measurement behaviour state using a five-point neonatal behaviour observation tool. One infrared temperature was taken from each of the devices, followed by an axillary measurement. Further behaviour-state observations were recorded following infrared and axillary measurements. RESULTS: One hundred measurements were collected from each infrared device among a cohort of 42 very low birth weight infants. Only one infrared device showed satisfactory agreement with bias -0.071 (95% limits of agreement -0.68 to 0.54). The other two devices demonstrated poor agreement: bias -1.34; 95% limits of agreement -2.62 to -0.5 and bias -0.56; 95% limits of agreement -1.38 to 0.25. Neonatal behavioural scores showed only minimal changes when infrared measurements were performed but increased significantly following axillary measurements. The difference between the two modalities was statistically significant with a mean increase of 1.44 points following axillary measurements (95% confidence interval 1.21 to 1.67, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Temperature measurements taken with infrared thermometers demonstrated less disruption to preterm infants' behavioural state, however accuracy of devices varied.
Authors: Mashette E Syrkin-Nikolau; Karen J Johnson; Tarah T Colaizy; Ruthann Schrock; Edward F Bell Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Sara Sollai; Carlo Dani; Elettra Berti; Claudia Fancelli; Luisa Galli; Maurizio de Martino; Elena Chiappini Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 2.692