Literature DB >> 23613020

Unsupervised spatiotemporal analysis of fMRI data using graph-based visualizations of self-organizing maps.

Santosh B Katwal1, John C Gore, Rene Marois, Baxter P Rogers.   

Abstract

We present novel graph-based visualizations of self-organizing maps for unsupervised functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis. A self-organizing map is an artificial neural network model that transforms high-dimensional data into a low-dimensional (often a 2-D) map using unsupervised learning. However, a postprocessing scheme is necessary to correctly interpret similarity between neighboring node prototypes (feature vectors) on the output map and delineate clusters and features of interest in the data. In this paper, we used graph-based visualizations to capture fMRI data features based upon 1) the distribution of data across the receptive fields of the prototypes (density-based connectivity); and 2) temporal similarities (correlations) between the prototypes (correlation-based connectivity). We applied this approach to identify task-related brain areas in an fMRI reaction time experiment involving a visuo-manual response task, and we correlated the time-to-peak of the fMRI responses in these areas with reaction time. Visualization of self-organizing maps outperformed independent component analysis and voxelwise univariate linear regression analysis in identifying and classifying relevant brain regions. We conclude that the graph-based visualizations of self-organizing maps help in advanced visualization of cluster boundaries in fMRI data enabling the separation of regions with small differences in the timings of their brain responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23613020      PMCID: PMC3919688          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2258344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  29 in total

1.  On clustering fMRI time series.

Authors:  C Goutte; P Toft; E Rostrup; F Nielsen; L K Hansen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Detecting low-frequency functional connectivity in fMRI using a self-organizing map (SOM) algorithm.

Authors:  Scott J Peltier; Thad A Polk; Douglas C Noll
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Model-free functional MRI analysis based on unsupervised clustering.

Authors:  Axel Wismüller; Anke Meyer-Bäse; Oliver Lange; Dorothee Auer; Maximilian F Reiser; DeWitt Sumners
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Hidden Markov event sequence models: toward unsupervised functional MRI brain mapping.

Authors:  Sylvain Faisan; Laurent Thoraval; Jean-Paul Armspach; Jack R Foucher; Marie-Noëlle Metz-Lutz; Fabrice Heitz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: unsupervised clustering versus independent component analysis.

Authors:  A Meyer-Baese; Axel Wismueller; Oliver Lange
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2004-09

6.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components.

Authors:  M J McKeown; S Makeig; G G Brown; T P Jung; S S Kindermann; A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses.

Authors:  G K Aguirre; E Zarahn; M D'esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions.

Authors:  E Zarahn; G K Aguirre; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A Unified attentional bottleneck in the human brain.

Authors:  Michael N Tombu; Christopher L Asplund; Paul E Dux; Douglass Godwin; Justin W Martin; René Marois
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Measuring relative timings of brain activities using fMRI.

Authors:  Santosh B Katwal; John C Gore; J Christopher Gatenby; Baxter P Rogers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  6 in total

1.  Variance decomposition for single-subject task-based fMRI activity estimates across many sessions.

Authors:  Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Gang Chen; Thomas E Nichols; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Learning from data: recognizing glaucomatous defect patterns and detecting progression from visual field measurements.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Recognizing patterns of visual field loss using unsupervised machine learning.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Michael H Goldbaum; Linda M Zangwill; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-21

4.  Experimental Validation of Dynamic Granger Causality for Inferring Stimulus-Evoked Sub-100 ms Timing Differences from fMRI.

Authors:  Yunzhi Wang; Santosh Katwal; Baxter Rogers; John Gore; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 5.  Brain functional network modeling and analysis based on fMRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhongyang Wang; Junchang Xin; Zhiqiong Wang; Yudong Yao; Yue Zhao; Wei Qian
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  Density-based clustering of static and dynamic functional MRI connectivity features obtained from subjects with cognitive impairment.

Authors:  D Rangaprakash; Toluwanimi Odemuyiwa; D Narayana Dutt; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2020-11-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.