Literature DB >> 23612316

Implementation of tumor testing for lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers at a large academic medical center.

Jessica Moline1, Haider Mahdi, Bin Yang, Charles Biscotti, Andres A Roma, Brandie Heald, Peter G Rose, Chad Michener, Charis Eng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary condition that increases the risk for endometrial and other cancers. Recognizing women at risk for LS based on personal/family history is burdensome and imprecise. Tumor testing using microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair protein expression can be an effective strategy for identifying potential LS in patients presenting with colorectal or endometrial cancer. Here we describe our experience implementing a screening program for endometrial cancers.
METHODS: Endometrial cancers diagnosed ≤50 years or those with suspicious personal history or histopathologic features were screened with MSI/IHC, June 2009-June 2011. Criteria were later (July 2011-July 2012) expanded to patients diagnosed <60 years, or at any age with suspicious features, and finally (after August 2012) universal screening was implemented. Screening techniques began with both MSI and IHC for every tumor, and later converted to IHC for two proteins, and MLH1 promoter methylation analysis when indicated. A genetic counselor contacted patients directly to offer genetic counseling appointments.
RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-five endometrial cancers (average age, 57 years) were screened. Sixty-two patients (25%) had abnormal results, and 42 patients were referred for genetic counseling. Of the 42 patients, 34 underwent genetic counseling, 28 pursued genetic testing, and 11 were diagnosed with LS. When age and pathology criteria were used, 27 eligible cases were overlooked for screening and 3 cases of LS were found only because a clinician requested screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Universal screening of endometrial cancers for LS is practical and successfully implemented with collaboration among genetic counselors, gynecologic oncologists, and pathologists.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23612316     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  33 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in gynecologic cancer genetics evaluation.

Authors:  Emily M Hinchcliff; Erica M Bednar; Karen H Lu; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Importance of PCR-based Tumor Testing in the Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome-associated Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Amanda S Bruegl; Annessa Kernberg; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Frequent loss of mutation-specific mismatch repair protein expression in nonneoplastic endometrium of Lynch syndrome patients.

Authors:  Serena Wong; Pei Hui; Natalia Buza
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.

Authors:  Daniel D Buchanan; Yen Y Tan; Michael D Walsh; Mark Clendenning; Alexander M Metcalf; Kaltin Ferguson; Sven T Arnold; Bryony A Thompson; Felicity A Lose; Michael T Parsons; Rhiannon J Walters; Sally-Ann Pearson; Margaret Cummings; Martin K Oehler; Penelope B Blomfield; Michael A Quinn; Judy A Kirk; Colin J Stewart; Andreas Obermair; Joanne P Young; Penelope M Webb; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Uterine endometrial carcinoma with DNA mismatch repair deficiency: magnetic resonance imaging findings and clinical features.

Authors:  Kiyoyuki Minamiguchi; Junko Takahama; Tomoko Uchiyama; Ryosuke Taiji; Natsuhiko Saito; Hiroshi Okada; Nagaaki Marugami; Yasuhito Tanase; Ryuji Kawaguchi; Chiho Ohbayashi; Hiroshi Kobayashi; Toshiko Hirai; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Clinical Challenges Associated with Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Amanda S Bruegl; Kari L Ring; Molly Daniels; Bryan M Fellman; Diana L Urbauer; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-12-13

7.  Consequences of universal MSI/IHC in screening ENDOMETRIAL cancer patients for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Brittany A L Batte; Amanda S Bruegl; Molly S Daniels; Kari L Ring; Katherine M Dempsey; Bojana Djordjevic; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Bryan M Fellman; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Loss of Mismatch Repair Protein Expression in Unselected Endometrial Adenocarcinoma Precursor Lesions.

Authors:  Koah Robin Vierkoetter; Laura A T Kagami; Hyeong Jun Ahn; David M Shimizu; Keith Y Terada
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Outcomes of screening endometrial cancer patients for Lynch syndrome by patient-administered checklist.

Authors:  Molly S Daniels; Diana L Urbauer; Azadeh Zangeneh; Brittany A L Batte; Katherine M Dempsey; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Lynch syndrome screening should be considered for all patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Anne M Mills; Sofia Liou; James M Ford; Jonathan S Berek; Reetesh K Pai; Teri A Longacre
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.394

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.