Literature DB >> 28820751

Importance of PCR-based Tumor Testing in the Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome-associated Endometrial Cancer.

Amanda S Bruegl1, Annessa Kernberg, Russell R Broaddus.   

Abstract

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer syndrome caused by a germline mutation in a DNA mismatch repair gene, usually MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2. The most common cancers associated with LS are colorectal adenocarcinoma and endometrial carcinoma. Identification of women with LS-associated endometrial cancer is important, as these women and their affected siblings and children are at-risk of developing these same cancers. Germline testing of all endometrial cancer patients is not cost effective, and screening using young age of cancer diagnosis and/or presence of family history of syndrome-associated is underutilized and ineffective. Therefore, most groups now advocate for tumor tissue testing to screen for LS, with germline testing targeted to women with abnormal tissue testing results. Immunohistochemistry for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 is used in many clinical laboratories for this tumor screening step, as immunohistochemistry is relatively inexpensive and is technically more accessible for smaller clinical labs. PCR-based tissue testing, whereas technically more challenging, does play an important role in the identification of these patients. MLH1 methylation analysis identifies women with tumor MLH1 loss who likely have sporadic endometrial cancer and do not need heightened cancer prevention surveillance. High levels of microsatellite instability have been identified in tumors with retained positive expression of mismatch repair proteins. Somatic sequencing of mismatch repair genes from tumor DNA, whereas not currently available in most clinical laboratories, is helpful in resolution of cases in which germline sequencing fails to identify a mutation in a mismatch repair gene. The tumor tissue testing approach can help to identify most women at-risk for germline mutations in a LS gene, but not all patients will be captured using this approach. Clinical suspicion can still play a pivotal role in accurately identifying a subset of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28820751      PMCID: PMC5657565          DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol        ISSN: 1072-4109            Impact factor:   3.875


  51 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of molecular screening for Lynch syndrome in patients with endometrial cancer ≤ 70 years.

Authors:  Celine H M Leenen; Margot G F van Lier; Helena C van Doorn; Monique E van Leerdam; Sjarlot G Kooi; Judith de Waard; Robert F Hoedemaeker; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Sanne M Hulspas; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Ernst J Kuipers; Anja Wagner; Winand N M Dinjens; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Wendy Frankel; Jenny Panescu; Janet Lockman; Kaisa Sotamaa; Daniel Fix; Ilene Comeras; Jennifer La Jeunesse; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Judith A Westman; Thomas W Prior; Mark Clendenning; Pamela Penzone; Janet Lombardi; Patti Dunn; David E Cohn; Larry Copeland; Lynne Eaton; Jeffrey Fowler; George Lewandowski; Luis Vaccarello; Jeffrey Bell; Gary Reid; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Gynecologic cancer as a "sentinel cancer" for women with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Karen H Lu; Mai Dinh; Wendy Kohlmann; Patrice Watson; Jane Green; Sapna Syngal; Prathap Bandipalliam; Lee-May Chen; Brian Allen; Peggy Conrad; Jonathan Terdiman; Charlotte Sun; Molly Daniels; Thomas Burke; David M Gershenson; Henry Lynch; Patrick Lynch; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Testing women with endometrial cancer to detect Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Janice S Kwon; Jenna L Scott; C Blake Gilks; Molly S Daniels; Charlotte C Sun; Karen H Lu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  MLH1 promoter methylation and gene silencing is the primary cause of microsatellite instability in sporadic endometrial cancers.

Authors:  S B Simpkins; T Bocker; E M Swisher; D G Mutch; D J Gersell; A J Kovatich; J P Palazzo; R Fishel; P J Goodfellow
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Implementation of tumor testing for lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers at a large academic medical center.

Authors:  Jessica Moline; Haider Mahdi; Bin Yang; Charles Biscotti; Andres A Roma; Brandie Heald; Peter G Rose; Chad Michener; Charis Eng
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Lynch syndrome screening strategies among newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Kimberly Resnick; J Michael Straughn; Floor Backes; Heather Hampel; Kellie S Matthews; David E Cohn
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Endometrial and colorectal tumors from patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer display different patterns of microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Shannon A Kuismanen; Anu-Liisa Moisio; Pascal Schweizer; Kaspar Truninger; Reijo Salovaara; Johanna Arola; Ralf Butzow; Josef Jiricny; Minna Nyström-Lahti; Päivi Peltomäki
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  MSI in endometrial carcinoma: absence of MLH1 promoter methylation is associated with increased familial risk for cancers.

Authors:  Alison J Whelan; Sheri Babb; David G Mutch; Janet Rader; Thomas J Herzog; Christina Todd; Jennifer L Ivanovich; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Colon and endometrial cancers with mismatch repair deficiency can arise from somatic, rather than germline, mutations.

Authors:  Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Heather Hampel; Jerneja Tomsic; Wendy L Frankel; Rachel Pearlman; Albert de la Chapelle; Colin C Pritchard
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  6 in total

1.  Understanding inherited risk in unselected newly diagnosed patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Karen A Cadoo; Diana L Mandelker; Semanti Mukherjee; Carolyn Stewart; Deborah DeLair; Vignesh Ravichandran; Preethi Srinivasan; Daire Hurley; Yelena Kemel; Angela G Arnold; Margaret Sheehan; Nisha Pradhan; Vijai Joseph; Dennis S Chi; Ginger J Gardner; Elizabeth L Jewell; Mario M Leitao; Kara Long Roche; Jennifer J Mueller; Yukio Sonoda; Oliver Zivanovic; Michael Walsh; Maria I Carlo; Michael F Berger; David Hyman; Liying Zhang; Mark E Robson; Kenneth Offit; Carol Aghajanian; Nadeem R Abu Rustum; Zsofia Stadler
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-04-25

Review 2.  Integrating Precision Medicine into the Contemporary Management of Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  Juliet E Wolford; Erin Ferrigni; Daniel Margul; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 5.945

3.  A PoleP286R mouse model of endometrial cancer recapitulates high mutational burden and immunotherapy response.

Authors:  Hao-Dong Li; Changzheng Lu; He Zhang; Qing Hu; Junqiu Zhang; Ileana C Cuevas; Subhransu S Sahoo; Mitzi Aguilar; Elizabeth G Maurais; Shanrong Zhang; Xiaojing Wang; Esra A Akbay; Guo-Min Li; Bo Li; Prasad Koduru; Peter Ly; Yang-Xin Fu; Diego H Castrillon
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 4.  The Role of Immunohistochemistry Markers in Endometrial Cancer with Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amelia Favier; Justine Varinot; Catherine Uzan; Alex Duval; Isabelle Brocheriou; Geoffroy Canlorbe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  A tumor association to be aware: endometrial cancer and colon cancer in relation to Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Behyamet Onka; Daoud Ali Mohamed; Romeo Thierry Tessi Yehouenou; Boris Adeyemi; Wend-Yam Mohammed Traore; Mbina Mbougou Kevin Arthur; Hounayda Jerguigue; Rachida Latib; Youssef Omor
Journal:  BJR Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-12

6.  Next-generation sequencing analysis of endometrial screening liquid-based cytology specimens: a comparative study to tissue specimens.

Authors:  Toshiaki Akahane; Ikumi Kitazono; Shintaro Yanazume; Masaki Kamio; Shinichi Togami; Ippei Sakamoto; Sachio Nohara; Seiya Yokoyama; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Tsubasa Hiraki; Shinsuke Suzuki; Shinichi Ueno; Akihide Tanimoto
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.063

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.