Literature DB >> 24323032

Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.

Daniel D Buchanan1, Yen Y Tan, Michael D Walsh, Mark Clendenning, Alexander M Metcalf, Kaltin Ferguson, Sven T Arnold, Bryony A Thompson, Felicity A Lose, Michael T Parsons, Rhiannon J Walters, Sally-Ann Pearson, Margaret Cummings, Martin K Oehler, Penelope B Blomfield, Michael A Quinn, Judy A Kirk, Colin J Stewart, Andreas Obermair, Joanne P Young, Penelope M Webb, Amanda B Spurdle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinicopathologic data from a population-based endometrial cancer cohort, unselected for age or family history, were analyzed to determine the optimal scheme for identification of patients with germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Endometrial cancers from 702 patients recruited into the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study (ANECS) were tested for MMR protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and for MLH1 gene promoter methylation in MLH1-deficient cases. MMR mutation testing was performed on germline DNA of patients with MMR-protein deficient tumors. Prediction of germline mutation status was compared for combinations of tumor characteristics, age at diagnosis, and various clinical criteria (Amsterdam, Bethesda, Society of Gynecologic Oncology, ANECS).
RESULTS: Tumor MMR-protein deficiency was detected in 170 (24%) of 702 cases. Germline testing of 158 MMR-deficient cases identified 22 truncating mutations (3% of all cases) and four unclassified variants. Tumor MLH1 methylation was detected in 99 (89%) of 111 cases demonstrating MLH1/PMS2 IHC loss; all were germline MLH1 mutation negative. A combination of MMR IHC plus MLH1 methylation testing in women younger than 60 years of age at diagnosis provided the highest positive predictive value for the identification of mutation carriers at 46% versus ≤ 41% for any other criteria considered.
CONCLUSION: Population-level identification of patients with MMR mutation-positive endometrial cancer is optimized by stepwise testing for tumor MMR IHC loss in patients younger than 60 years, tumor MLH1 methylation in individuals with MLH1 IHC loss, and germline mutations in patients exhibiting loss of MSH6, MSH2, or PMS2 or loss of MLH1/PMS2 with absence of MLH1 methylation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24323032      PMCID: PMC4876359          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.2129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  70 in total

1.  Family history and women with ovarian cancer: is it asked and does it matter?: An observational study.

Authors:  Anne Lanceley; Zara Eagle; Gemma Ogden; Sue Gessler; Khalil Razvi; Jonathan A Ledermann; Lucy Side
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Precision and performance characteristics of bisulfite conversion and real-time PCR (MethyLight) for quantitative DNA methylation analysis.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Takako Kawasaki; Mohan Brahmandam; Mami Cantor; Gregory J Kirkner; Donna Spiegelman; G Mike Makrigiorgos; Daniel J Weisenberger; Peter W Laird; Massimo Loda; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Wendy Frankel; Jenny Panescu; Janet Lockman; Kaisa Sotamaa; Daniel Fix; Ilene Comeras; Jennifer La Jeunesse; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Judith A Westman; Thomas W Prior; Mark Clendenning; Pamela Penzone; Janet Lombardi; Patti Dunn; David E Cohn; Larry Copeland; Lynne Eaton; Jeffrey Fowler; George Lewandowski; Luis Vaccarello; Jeffrey Bell; Gary Reid; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Mutation deep within an intron of MSH2 causes Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Mark Clendenning; Daniel D Buchanan; Michael D Walsh; Belinda Nagler; Christophe Rosty; Bryony Thompson; Amanda B Spurdle; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Joanne P Young
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Endometrial tumour BRAF mutations and MLH1 promoter methylation as predictors of germline mismatch repair gene mutation status: a literature review.

Authors:  Alexander M Metcalf; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Point: justification for Lynch syndrome screening among all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Heather Hampel
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 7.  Identifying Lynch syndrome in patients with endometrial carcinoma: shortcomings of morphologic and clinical schemas.

Authors:  Blaise A Clarke; Kumarasen Cooper
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.875

8.  Improving identification of lynch syndrome patients: a comparison of research data with clinical records.

Authors:  Yen Y Tan; Julie McGaughran; Kaltin Ferguson; Michael D Walsh; Daniel D Buchanan; Joanne P Young; Penelope M Webb; Andreas Obermair; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Molecular characterization of MSI-H colorectal cancer by MLHI promoter methylation, immunohistochemistry, and mismatch repair germline mutation screening.

Authors:  Jenny N Poynter; Kimberly D Siegmund; Daniel J Weisenberger; Tiffany I Long; Stephen N Thibodeau; Noralane Lindor; Joanne Young; Mark A Jenkins; John L Hopper; John A Baron; Dan Buchanan; Graham Casey; A Joan Levine; Loïc Le Marchand; Steven Gallinger; Bharati Bapat; John D Potter; Polly A Newcomb; Robert W Haile; Peter W Laird
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Implementation of tumor testing for lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers at a large academic medical center.

Authors:  Jessica Moline; Haider Mahdi; Bin Yang; Charles Biscotti; Andres A Roma; Brandie Heald; Peter G Rose; Chad Michener; Charis Eng
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  70 in total

1.  SEOM clinical guideline on hereditary colorectal cancer (2019).

Authors:  C Guillén-Ponce; E Lastra; I Lorenzo-Lorenzo; T Martín Gómez; R Morales Chamorro; A B Sánchez-Heras; R Serrano; M C Soriano Rodríguez; J L Soto; L Robles
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Tumor testing to identify lynch syndrome in two Australian colorectal cancer cohorts.

Authors:  Daniel D Buchanan; Mark Clendenning; Christophe Rosty; Dallas English; Mark A Jenkins; Stine V Eriksen; Michael D Walsh; Rhiannon J Walters; Stephen N Thibodeau; Jenna Stewart; Susan Preston; Aung Ko Win; Louisa Flander; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Finlay A Macrae; Alex Boussioutas; Ingrid M Winship; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Melissa C Southey
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.029

3.  Epigenetic silencing of MLH1 in endometrial cancers is associated with larger tumor volume, increased rate of lymph node positivity and reduced recurrence-free survival.

Authors:  Casey M Cosgrove; David E Cohn; Heather Hampel; Wendy L Frankel; Dan Jones; Joseph P McElroy; Adrian A Suarez; Weiqiang Zhao; Wei Chen; Ritu Salani; Larry J Copeland; David M O'Malley; Jeffrey M Fowler; Ahmet Yilmaz; Alexis S Chassen; Rachel Pearlman; Paul J Goodfellow; Floor J Backes
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  DNA mismatch repair protein deficient non-neoplastic colonic crypts: a novel indicator of Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Rish K Pai; Beth Dudley; Eve Karloski; Randall E Brand; Neil O'Callaghan; Christophe Rosty; Daniel D Buchanan; Mark A Jenkins; Stephen N Thibodeau; Amy J French; Noralane M Lindor; Reetesh K Pai
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Correlation of MLH1 polymorphisms, survival statistics, in silico assessment and gene downregulation with clinical outcomes among breast cancer cases.

Authors:  Saima Shakil Malik; Ayisha Zia; Sumaira Mubarik; Nosheen Masood; Sajid Rashid; Alice Sherrard; Muhammad Bilal Khan; Muhammad Tahir Khadim
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 6.  Laboratory Assays in Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bojana Djordjevic; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2016-04-11

7.  Modern day screening for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer: the KEM experience.

Authors:  Nina Pauly; Thaïs Baert; Rita Schmutzler; Andreas du Bois; Stephanie Schneider; Kerstin Rhiem; Birgid Schömig-Markiefka; Janna Siemanowski; Sebastian Heikaus; Alexander Traut; Florian Heitz; Sonia Prader; Sarah Ehmann; Philipp Harter; Beyhan Ataseven
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  Clinicopathologic Significance of Mismatch Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  D Scott McMeekin; David L Tritchler; David E Cohn; David G Mutch; Heather A Lankes; Melissa A Geller; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Lisa M Landrum; Richard Zaino; Russell D Broaddus; Nilsa Ramirez; Feng Gao; Shamshad Ali; Kathleen M Darcy; Michael L Pearl; Paul A DiSilvestro; Shashikant B Lele; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Role of endometrial cancer abnormal MMR protein in screening Lynch-syndrome families.

Authors:  Qiongxian Long; Yong Peng; Zhirong Tang; Cailiang Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

10.  Consequences of universal MSI/IHC in screening ENDOMETRIAL cancer patients for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Brittany A L Batte; Amanda S Bruegl; Molly S Daniels; Kari L Ring; Katherine M Dempsey; Bojana Djordjevic; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Bryan M Fellman; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.