Literature DB >> 23611992

Individual A-scan signal normalization between two spectral domain optical coherence tomography devices.

Chieh-Li Chen1, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Gadi Wollstein, Yun Ling, Richard A Bilonick, Larry Kagemann, Ian A Sigal, Joel S Schuman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We developed a method to normalize optical coherence tomography (OCT) signal profiles from two spectral-domain (SD) OCT devices so that the comparability between devices increases.
METHODS: We scanned 21 eyes from 14 healthy and 7 glaucoma subjects with two SD-OCT devices on the same day, with equivalent cube scan patterns centered on the fovea (Cirrus HD-OCT and RTVue). Foveola positions were selected manually and used as the center for registration of the corresponding images. A-scan signals were sampled 1.8 mm from the foveola in the temporal, superior, nasal, and inferior quadrants. After oversampling and rescaling RTVue data along the Z-axis to match the corresponding Cirrus data format, speckle noise reduction and amplitude normalization were applied. For comparison between normalized A-scan profiles, mean absolute difference in amplitude in percentage was measured at each sampling point. As a reference, the mean absolute difference between two Cirrus scans on the same eye also was measured.
RESULTS: The mean residual of the A-scan profile amplitude was reduced significantly after signal normalization (12.7% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.0001, paired t-test). All four quadrants also showed statistically significant reduction (all P < 0.0001). Mean absolute difference after normalization was smaller than the one between two Cirrus scans. No performance difference was detected between health and glaucomatous eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: The reported signal normalization method successfully reduced the A-scan profile differences between two SD-OCT devices. This signal normalization processing may improve the direct comparability of OCT image analysis and measurement on various devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparability; image analysis; optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23611992      PMCID: PMC3658265          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-11484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement between 2 spectral domain OCT instruments.

Authors:  Benjamin B Tan; Maricel Natividad; Kia-Chong Chua; Leonard W Yip
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Authors:  Mauro T Leite; Harsha L Rao; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Ali Tafreshi; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Automated retinal shadow compensation of optical coherence tomography images.

Authors:  Tapio Fabritius; Shuichi Makita; Yongjoo Hong; Risto Myllylä; Yoshiaki Yasuno
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Shadow removal and contrast enhancement in optical coherence tomography images of the human optic nerve head.

Authors:  Michaël J A Girard; Nicholas G Strouthidis; C Ross Ethier; Jean Martial Mari
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Special requirements for electronic health record systems in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Michael V Boland; Allen Brewer; K David Epley; Mark B Horton; Michele C Lim; Colin A McCannel; Sayjal J Patel; David E Silverstone; Linda Wedemeyer; Flora Lum
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work.

Authors:  Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Three dimensional optical coherence tomography imaging: advantages and advances.

Authors:  Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Juan Xu; Jongsick Kim; Larry Kagemann; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 21.198

8.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kyung Rim Sung; Dong Yoon Kim; Sung Bae Park; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Fully automatic three-dimensional quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: method and Validation.

Authors:  Kenji Sihan; Charl Botha; Frits Post; Sebastiaan de Winter; Nieves Gonzalo; Evelyn Regar; Patrick J W C Serruys; Ronald Hamers; Nico Bruining
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness.

Authors:  G Vizzeri; R N Weinreb; A O Gonzalez-Garcia; C Bowd; F A Medeiros; P A Sample; L M Zangwill
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  7 in total

1.  Signal normalization reduces systematic measurement differences between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices.

Authors:  Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Yun Ling; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Juan Xu; James G Fujimoto; Ian A Sigal; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Histogram Matching Extends Acceptable Signal Strength Range on Optical Coherence Tomography Images.

Authors:  Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Ian A Sigal; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Residual and Dynamic Range of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma: Comparison of Three OCT Platforms.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Mwanza; Hanna Y Kim; Donald L Budenz; Joshua L Warren; Michael Margolis; Scott D Lawrence; Pooja D Jani; Garrett S Thompson; Richard K Lee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Do different spectral domain OCT hardwares measure the same? Comparison of retinal thickness using third-party software.

Authors:  Birgit Sander; Hajer Ahmad Al-Abiji; Mads Kofod; Thomas Martini Jørgensen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Signal Normalization Reduces Image Appearance Disparity Among Multiple Optical Coherence Tomography Devices.

Authors:  Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Virtual Averaging Making Nonframe-Averaged Optical Coherence Tomography Images Comparable to Frame-Averaged Images.

Authors:  Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  A Reflectivity Measure to Quantify Bruch's Membrane Calcification in Patients with Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum Using Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Sara Risseeuw; Edwin Bennink; Maarten G Poirot; Pim A de Jong; Wilko Spiering; Saskia M Imhof; Redmer van Leeuwen; Jeannette Ossewaarde-van Norel
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.