Chieh-Li Chen1, Hiroshi Ishikawa1, Gadi Wollstein1, Richard A Bilonick2, Ian A Sigal1, Larry Kagemann1, Joel S Schuman1. 1. UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States 2Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of En. 2. UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States 3Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Pu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We minimized the influence of image quality variability, as measured by signal strength (SS), on optical coherence tomography (OCT) thickness measurements using the histogram matching (HM) method. METHODS: We scanned 12 eyes from 12 healthy subjects with the Cirrus HD-OCT device to obtain a series of OCT images with a wide range of SS (maximal range, 1-10) at the same visit. For each eye, the histogram of an image with the highest SS (best image quality) was set as the reference. We applied HM to the images with lower SS by shaping the input histogram into the reference histogram. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was automatically measured before and after HM processing (defined as original and HM measurements), and compared to the device output (device measurements). Nonlinear mixed effects models were used to analyze the relationship between RNFL thickness and SS. In addition, the lowest tolerable SSs, which gave the RNFL thickness within the variability margin of manufacturer recommended SS range (6-10), were determined for device, original, and HM measurements. RESULTS: The HM measurements showed less variability across a wide range of image quality than the original and device measurements (slope = 1.17 vs. 4.89 and 1.72 μm/SS, respectively). The lowest tolerable SS was successfully reduced to 4.5 after HM processing. CONCLUSIONS: The HM method successfully extended the acceptable SS range on OCT images. This would qualify more OCT images with low SS for clinical assessment, broadening the OCT application to a wider range of subjects.
PURPOSE: We minimized the influence of image quality variability, as measured by signal strength (SS), on optical coherence tomography (OCT) thickness measurements using the histogram matching (HM) method. METHODS: We scanned 12 eyes from 12 healthy subjects with the Cirrus HD-OCT device to obtain a series of OCT images with a wide range of SS (maximal range, 1-10) at the same visit. For each eye, the histogram of an image with the highest SS (best image quality) was set as the reference. We applied HM to the images with lower SS by shaping the input histogram into the reference histogram. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was automatically measured before and after HM processing (defined as original and HM measurements), and compared to the device output (device measurements). Nonlinear mixed effects models were used to analyze the relationship between RNFL thickness and SS. In addition, the lowest tolerable SSs, which gave the RNFL thickness within the variability margin of manufacturer recommended SS range (6-10), were determined for device, original, and HM measurements. RESULTS: The HM measurements showed less variability across a wide range of image quality than the original and device measurements (slope = 1.17 vs. 4.89 and 1.72 μm/SS, respectively). The lowest tolerable SS was successfully reduced to 4.5 after HM processing. CONCLUSIONS: The HM method successfully extended the acceptable SS range on OCT images. This would qualify more OCT images with low SS for clinical assessment, broadening the OCT application to a wider range of subjects.
Authors: Daniel M Stein; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Ellen Hertzmark; Robert J Noecker; Joel S Schuman Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Carol Yim Lui Cheung; Christopher Kai Shun Leung; Dusheung Lin; Chi-Pui Pang; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: David J Russell; Shamis Fallah; Christopher J Loer; Robert H Riffenburgh Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Hiroshi Ishikawa; Daniel M Stein; Gadi Wollstein; Siobahn Beaton; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Margaret R Strampe; Luai Eldweik; Benjamin C Chaon; Sarah Maki; Tyler Wieland; Celine Satija; Collin McClelland; Michael S Lee Journal: Neuroophthalmology Date: 2019-10-29
Authors: Takashi Nishida; Sasan Moghimi; Huiyuan Hou; James A Proudfoot; Aimee C Chang; Ryan Caezar C David; Alireza Kamalipour; Nevin El-Nimri; Jasmin Rezapour; Christopher Bowd; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 5.908
Authors: Andrew Lang; Aaron Carass; Bruno M Jedynak; Sharon D Solomon; Peter A Calabresi; Jerry L Prince Journal: Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging Date: 2016-06-16
Authors: Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Simon S Gao; Yali Jia; Liang Liu; Miao Zhang; Hana L Takusagawa; John C Morrison; David Huang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799