Literature DB >> 23610134

Not just for consumers: context effects are fundamental to decision making.

Jennifer S Trueblood1, Scott D Brown, Andrew Heathcote, Jerome R Busemeyer.   

Abstract

Context effects--preference changes that depend on the availability of other options--have attracted a great deal of attention among consumer researchers studying high-level decision tasks. In the experiments reported here, we showed that these effects also arise in simple perceptual-decision-making tasks. This finding casts doubt on explanations limited to consumer choice and high-level decisions, and it indicates that context effects may be amenable to a general explanation at the level of the basic decision process. We demonstrated for the first time that three important context effects from the preferential-choice literature--similarity, attraction, and compromise effects--all occurred within a single perceptual-decision task. Not only do our results challenge previous explanations for context effects proposed by consumer researchers, but they also challenge the choice rules assumed in theories of perceptual decision making.

Keywords:  attraction effect; compromise effect; decision making; perception; perceptual decision making; preferences; preferential choice; similarity effect

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23610134     DOI: 10.1177/0956797612464241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  30 in total

1.  Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) exhibit the decoy effect in a perceptual discrimination task.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Response-time data provide critical constraints on dynamic models of multi-alternative, multi-attribute choice.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans; William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

4.  Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsetsos; Rani Moran; James Moreland; Nick Chater; Marius Usher; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Adaptive neural coding: from biological to behavioral decision-making.

Authors:  Kenway Louie; Paul W Glimcher; Ryan Webb
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2015-08-29

6.  Absolutely relative or relatively absolute: violations of value invariance in human decision making.

Authors:  Andrei R Teodorescu; Rani Moran; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

7.  Task-specific modulation of adult humans' tool preferences: number of choices and size of the problem.

Authors:  Kathleen M Silva; Thomas J Gross; Francisco J Silva
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  The appropriacy of averaging in the study of context effects.

Authors:  Shi Xian Liew; Piers D L Howe; Daniel R Little
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

9.  Information sampling behavior with explicit sampling costs.

Authors:  Mordechai Z Juni; Todd M Gureckis; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2016-07

10.  Attraction to similar options: The Gestalt law of proximity is related to the attraction effect.

Authors:  Liz Izakson; Yoav Zeevi; Dino J Levy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.