Literature DB >> 33112897

Attraction to similar options: The Gestalt law of proximity is related to the attraction effect.

Liz Izakson1,2, Yoav Zeevi1,3, Dino J Levy1,2.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that there are common mechanisms between perceptual and value-based processes. For instance, both perceptual and value-based choices are highly influenced by the context in which the choices are made. However, the mechanisms which allow context to influence our choice process as well as the extent of the similarity between the perceptual and preferential processes are still unclear. In this study, we examine a within-subject relation between the attraction effect, which is a well-known effect of context on preferential choice, and the Gestalt law of proximity. Then, we aim to use this link to better understand the mechanisms underlying the attraction effect. We conducted one study followed by an additional pre-registered replication study, where subjects performed a Gestalt-psychophysical task and a decoy task. Comparing the behavioral sensitivity of each subject in both tasks, we found that the more susceptible a subject is to the proximity law, the more she displayed the attraction effect. These results demonstrate a within-subject relation between a perceptual phenomenon (proximity law) and a value-based bias (attraction effect) which further strengthens the notion of common rules between perceptual and value-based processing. Moreover, this suggests that the mechanism underlying the attraction effect is related to grouping by proximity with attention as a mediator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33112897      PMCID: PMC7592845          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  34 in total

1.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making.

Authors:  R M Roe; J R Busemeyer; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.

Authors:  Marius Usher; James L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Role of Gestalt grouping in selective attention: evidence from the Stroop task.

Authors:  Martijn J M Lamers; Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-11

Review 5.  Cognitive and Neural Bases of Multi-Attribute, Multi-Alternative, Value-based Decisions.

Authors:  Jerome R Busemeyer; Sebastian Gluth; Jörg Rieskamp; Brandon M Turner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  The multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multialternative choice.

Authors:  Jennifer S Trueblood; Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  In the attraction, compromise, and similarity effects, alternatives are repeatedly compared in pairs on single dimensions.

Authors:  Takao Noguchi; Neil Stewart
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-04-21

9.  Representation of reward feedback in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Brosch; Elena Selezneva; Henning Scheich
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-07

10.  Attraction Effect in Risky Choice Can Be Explained by Subjective Distance Between Choice Alternatives.

Authors:  Peter N C Mohr; Hauke R Heekeren; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.