Literature DB >> 2360738

Comparison of brachial and radial arterial pressure monitoring in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

M G Bazaral1, M Welch, L A Golding, K Badhwar.   

Abstract

The pressure in either the radial (n = 88) or proximal brachial artery (n = 82) was compared with aortic pressure before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafts. Radial artery pressures were measured via 20-G 5-cm long catheters, brachial artery pressures via 20-G 12.7-cm catheters, and aortic pressures were measured via a luer port in the aortic perfusion cannula. Transducers were connected via 122-cm long tubing. For the various systems, mean natural frequencies were 16.1 to 17.7 Hz and damping coefficients were 0.16 to 0.27. Before CPB the brachial systolic, diastolic, and mean pressures were 108.2 +/- 5.2%, 100.9 +/- 2.8%, and 99.6 +/- 2.3% of aortic; respective radial pressures were 113.9 +/- 9.6%, 99.5 +/- 2.8%, and 98.4 +/- 2.8% of aortic. Immediately after CPB the brachial pressures were 99.5 +/- 7.5%, 98.9 +/- 3.5%, and 97.4 +/- 2.9% of aortic, whereas respective radial pressures were 92.1 +/- 14.6%, 94.7 +/- 5.6%, and 90.8 +/- 7.4%. All brachial and radial as a per cent of aortic pressure medians were significantly different, and except for prebypass diastolic and mean, the variance for brachial pressures was significantly less than that for pressures in the radial artery. The prebypass brachial correlation (r) with aortic for systolic, diastolic, and mean were 0.90, 0.98, and 0.98; respective radial correlations with aortic were 0.78, 0.97, and 0.95. Postbypass brachial systolic, diastolic, and mean correlations were 0.91, 0.97, and 0.98; radial were 0.50, 0.93, and 0.83. Brachial artery pressures were more accurate and reliable than radial artery pressures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2360738     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199007000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  11 in total

1.  Sustained effects of plasma norepinephrine levels on femoral-radial pressure gradient after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  R Nakayama; T Goto; I Kukita; R Sakata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Considerations for SphygmoCor radial artery pulse wave analysis: side selection and peripheral arterial blood pressure calibration.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Martin; Alexandra R Borges; John B Christy; Darren T Beck
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Practical Suitability of a Stand-Alone Oscillometric Central Blood Pressure Monitor: A Review of the Microlife WatchBP Office Central.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Hao-Min Cheng; Li-Chih Huang; Chia-Ming Lin; Yao-Pin Teng; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-12

4.  Complications from brachial arterial pressure monitoring are rare in patients having cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Asha Singh; Brett J Wakefield; Andra E Duncan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Invasive monitoring of blood pressure: a radiant future for brachial artery as an alternative to radial artery catheterisation?

Authors:  Karim Lakhal; Vincent Robert-Edan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Can we trust radial artery pressure monitoring for cardiac surgery?

Authors:  Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze; Adrian Costescu; André Denault
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 6.713

7.  Differential vascular reactivity responses acutely following ingestion of a nitrate rich red spinach extract.

Authors:  Cody T Haun; Wesley C Kephart; Angelia M Holland; Christopher B Mobley; Anna E McCloskey; Joshua J Shake; David D Pascoe; Michael D Roberts; Jeffrey S Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Case report: Iatrogenic brachial artery dissection with complete anterograde occlusion during elective arterial line placement.

Authors:  Laurence Weinberg; Diana Abu-Ssaydeh; Manfred Spanger; Patrick Lu; Michael H-G Li
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-12-27

Review 9.  Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine.

Authors:  Bernd Scheer; Azriel Perel; Ulrich J Pfeiffer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  How to measure blood pressure using an arterial catheter: a systematic 5-step approach.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Kouz; Agnes S Meidert; Leonie Schulte-Uentrop; Stefano Romagnoli
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.