Literature DB >> 23603349

ICA-based artifact correction improves spatial localization of adaptive spatial filters in MEG.

Zainab Fatima1, Maher A Quraan, Natasa Kovacevic, Anthony Randal McIntosh.   

Abstract

Beamformers are one of the most common inverse models currently used in the estimation of source activity from magnetoencephelography (MEG) data. They rely on a minimization of total power while constraining the gain in the voxel of interest, resulting in the suppression of background noise. Nonetheless, in cases where background noise is strong compared to the source of interest, or when many sources are present, the ability of the beamformer to detect and accurately localize weak sources is reduced. In visual paradigms, two main background sources can substantially impact an accurate estimation of weaker sources. Ocular artifacts are orders of magnitude higher than neural sources making it difficult for the beamformer to effectively suppress them. Primary visual activations also result in strong signals that can impede localization of weak sources. In this paper, we systematically evaluated how neural (visual) and non-neural (eye, heart) sources affect the localization accuracy of frontal and medial temporal sources in visual tasks. These sources are of tremendous interest in learning and memory studies as well as in clinical settings (Alzheimer's/epilepsy) and are typically difficult to localize robustly in MEG. Empirical data from two tasks - active learning and control - were used to evaluate our analysis techniques. Global field power calculations showed multiple time periods where active learning was significantly different from response selection with dominant sources converging to the eyes. Extensive leakage of eye activity into frontal and visual that evoked responses into parietal cortices was also observed. Contributions from ocular activity to the reconstructed time series were indiscernible from task-based recruitment of frontal sources in the original data. Removing artifacts (eye movements, cardiac, and muscular) by means of independent component analysis (ICA) led to a significant improvement in detection and localization of frontal and medial temporal sources. We verified our results by using simulations of sources placed in frontal and medial temporal regions with various types of background noise (eye, heart, and visual). We report that the detection and localization accuracy of frontal and medial temporal sources with beamformer techniques is highly dependent on the magnitude and location of background sources and that removing artifacts can substantially improve the beamformer's performance.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23603349     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  11 in total

1.  Dynamic functional connectivity shapes individual differences in associative learning.

Authors:  Zainab Fatima; Natasha Kovacevic; Bratislav Misic; Anthony Randal McIntosh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Automatic 1D Convolutional Neural Network-based Detection of Artifacts in MEG acquired without Electrooculography or Electrocardiography.

Authors:  Prabhat Garg; Elizabeth Davenport; Gowtham Murugesan; Ben Wagner; Christopher Whitlow; Joseph Maldjian; Albert Montillo
Journal:  Int Workshop Pattern Recognit Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-07-20

3.  Using Convolutional Neural Networks to Automatically Detect Eye-Blink Artifacts in Magnetoencephalography Without Resorting to Electrooculography.

Authors:  Prabhat Garg; Elizabeth Davenport; Gowtham Murugesan; Ben Wagner; Christopher Whitlow; Joseph Maldjian; Albert Montillo
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2017-09-04

4.  Accumulated source imaging of brain activity with both low and high-frequency neuromagnetic signals.

Authors:  Jing Xiang; Qian Luo; Rupesh Kotecha; Abraham Korman; Fawen Zhang; Huan Luo; Hisako Fujiwara; Nat Hemasilpin; Douglas F Rose
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.081

5.  Association with emotional information alters subsequent processing of neutral faces.

Authors:  Lily Riggs; Takako Fujioka; Jessica Chan; Douglas A McQuiggan; Adam K Anderson; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Early neural activation during facial affect processing in adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Rachel C Leung; Elizabeth W Pang; Daniel Cassel; Jessica A Brian; Mary Lou Smith; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  The functional connectivity landscape of the human brain.

Authors:  Bratislav Mišić; Zainab Fatima; Mary K Askren; Martin Buschkuehl; Nathan Churchill; Bernadine Cimprich; Patricia J Deldin; Susanne Jaeggi; Misook Jung; Michele Korostil; Ethan Kross; Katherine M Krpan; Scott Peltier; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Stephen C Strother; John Jonides; Anthony R McIntosh; Marc G Berman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Using OPMs to measure neural activity in standing, mobile participants.

Authors:  Robert A Seymour; Nicholas Alexander; Stephanie Mellor; George C O'Neill; Tim M Tierney; Gareth R Barnes; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  MEGnet: Automatic ICA-based artifact removal for MEG using spatiotemporal convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Alex H Treacher; Prabhat Garg; Elizabeth Davenport; Ryan Godwin; Amy Proskovec; Leonardo Guimaraes Bezerra; Gowtham Murugesan; Ben Wagner; Christopher T Whitlow; Joel D Stitzel; Joseph A Maldjian; Albert A Montillo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 7.400

10.  Medial prefrontal theta phase coupling during spatial memory retrieval.

Authors:  Raphael Kaplan; Daniel Bush; Mathilde Bonnefond; Peter A Bandettini; Gareth R Barnes; Christian F Doeller; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.