BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by abnormalities in structure, function, and connectivity in several brain regions. Few studies have examined how these regions are organized in the brain or investigated network-level structural aberrations that might be associated with depression. METHODS: We used graph analysis to examine the gray matter structural networks of individuals diagnosed with MDD (n = 93) and a demographically similar healthy comparison group (n = 151) with no history of psychopathology. The efficiency of structural networks for processing information was determined by quantifying local interconnectivity (clustering) and global integration (path length). We also compared the groups on the contributions of high-degree nodes (i.e., hubs) and regional network measures, including degree (number of connections in a node) and betweenness (fraction of short path connections in a node). RESULTS: Depressed participants had significantly decreased clustering in their brain networks across a range of network densities. Compared with control subjects, depressed participants had fewer hubs primarily in medial frontal and medial temporal areas, had higher degree in the left supramarginal gyrus and right gyrus rectus, and had higher betweenness in the right amygdala and left medial orbitofrontal gyrus. CONCLUSIONS: Networks of depressed individuals are characterized by a less efficient organization involving decreased regional connectivity compared with control subjects. Regional connections in the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex may play a role in maintaining or adapting to depressive pathology. This is the first report of anomalous large-scale gray matter structural networks in MDD and provides new insights concerning the neurobiological mechanisms associated with this disorder.
BACKGROUND:Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by abnormalities in structure, function, and connectivity in several brain regions. Few studies have examined how these regions are organized in the brain or investigated network-level structural aberrations that might be associated with depression. METHODS: We used graph analysis to examine the gray matter structural networks of individuals diagnosed with MDD (n = 93) and a demographically similar healthy comparison group (n = 151) with no history of psychopathology. The efficiency of structural networks for processing information was determined by quantifying local interconnectivity (clustering) and global integration (path length). We also compared the groups on the contributions of high-degree nodes (i.e., hubs) and regional network measures, including degree (number of connections in a node) and betweenness (fraction of short path connections in a node). RESULTS:Depressedparticipants had significantly decreased clustering in their brain networks across a range of network densities. Compared with control subjects, depressedparticipants had fewer hubs primarily in medial frontal and medial temporal areas, had higher degree in the left supramarginal gyrus and right gyrus rectus, and had higher betweenness in the right amygdala and left medial orbitofrontal gyrus. CONCLUSIONS: Networks of depressed individuals are characterized by a less efficient organization involving decreased regional connectivity compared with control subjects. Regional connections in the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex may play a role in maintaining or adapting to depressive pathology. This is the first report of anomalous large-scale gray matter structural networks in MDD and provides new insights concerning the neurobiological mechanisms associated with this disorder.
Authors: Y Iturria-Medina; E J Canales-Rodríguez; L Melie-García; P A Valdés-Hernández; E Martínez-Montes; Y Alemán-Gómez; J M Sánchez-Bornot Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Danielle S Bassett; Edward Bullmore; Beth A Verchinski; Venkata S Mattay; Daniel R Weinberger; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: H Johansen-Berg; D A Gutman; T E J Behrens; P M Matthews; M F S Rushworth; E Katz; A M Lozano; H S Mayberg Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Paul J Thomas; Srinivas Panchamukhi; Joshua Nathan; Jennifer Francis; Scott Langenecker; Stephanie Gorka; Alex Leow; Heide Klumpp; K Luan Phan; Olusola A Ajilore Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Taolin Chen; Keith M Kendrick; Jinhui Wang; Min Wu; Kaiming Li; Xiaoqi Huang; Yuejia Luo; Su Lui; John A Sweeney; Qiyong Gong Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Marc S Lener; Prantik Kundu; Edmund Wong; Kaitlin E Dewilde; Cheuk Y Tang; Priti Balchandani; James W Murrough Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.839