Literature DB >> 23599345

Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis.

Liisa Kauppi1, Marco Barchi, Julian Lange, Frédéric Baudat, Maria Jasin, Scott Keeney.   

Abstract

Different organisms display widely different numbers of the programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate meiotic recombination (e.g., hundreds per meiocyte in mice and humans vs. dozens in nematodes), but little is known about what drives these species-specific DSB set points or the regulatory pathways that control them. Here we examine male mice with a lowered dosage of SPO11, the meiotic DSB catalyst, to gain insight into the effect of reduced DSB numbers on mammalian chromosome dynamics. An approximately twofold DSB reduction was associated with the reduced ability of homologs to synapse along their lengths, provoking prophase arrest and, ultimately, sterility. In many spermatocytes, chromosome subsets displayed a mix of synaptic failure and synapsis with both homologous and nonhomologous partners ("chromosome tangles"). The X chromosome was nearly always involved in tangles, and small autosomes were involved more often than large ones. We conclude that homolog pairing requirements dictate DSB set points during meiosis. Importantly, our results reveal that karyotype is a key factor: Smaller autosomes and heteromorphic sex chromosomes become weak links when DSBs are reduced below a critical threshold. Unexpectedly, unsynapsed chromosome segments trapped in tangles displayed an elevated density of DSB markers later in meiotic prophase. The unsynapsed portion of the X chromosome in wild-type males also showed evidence that DSB numbers increased as prophase progressed. These findings point to the existence of a feedback mechanism that links DSB number and distribution with interhomolog interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23599345      PMCID: PMC3650225          DOI: 10.1101/gad.213652.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  85 in total

1.  Robust crossover assurance and regulated interhomolog access maintain meiotic crossover number.

Authors:  Simona Rosu; Diana E Libuda; Anne M Villeneuve
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Meiotic double-strand breaks occur once per pair of (sister) chromatids and, via Mec1/ATR and Tel1/ATM, once per quartet of chromatids.

Authors:  Liangran Zhang; Keun P Kim; Nancy E Kleckner; Aurora Storlazzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comprehensive, fine-scale dissection of homologous recombination outcomes at a hot spot in mouse meiosis.

Authors:  Francesca Cole; Scott Keeney; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  The frequency of heterologous synapsis increases with aging in Robertsonian heterozygous male mice.

Authors:  Chiara Vasco; Marcia Manterola; Jesus Page; Maurizio Zuccotti; Roberto de la Fuente; Carlo Alberto Redi; Raul Fernandez-Donoso; Silvia Garagna
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  An asymmetric chromosome pair undergoes synaptic adjustment and crossover redistribution during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis: implications for sex chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Jonathan V Henzel; Kentaro Nabeshima; Mara Schvarzstein; B Elizabeth Turner; Anne M Villeneuve; Kenneth J Hillers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Distinct properties of the XY pseudoautosomal region crucial for male meiosis.

Authors:  Liisa Kauppi; Marco Barchi; Frédéric Baudat; Peter J Romanienko; Scott Keeney; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Meiotic homologue alignment and its quality surveillance are controlled by mouse HORMAD1.

Authors:  Katrin Daniel; Julian Lange; Khaled Hached; Jun Fu; Konstantinos Anastassiadis; Ignasi Roig; Howard J Cooke; A Francis Stewart; Katja Wassmann; Maria Jasin; Scott Keeney; Attila Tóth
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Hormad1 mutation disrupts synaptonemal complex formation, recombination, and chromosome segregation in mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Yong-Hyun Shin; Youngsok Choi; Serpil Uckac Erdin; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Malgorzata Kloc; Fang Yang; P Jeremy Wang; Marvin L Meistrich; Aleksandar Rajkovic
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  ATM controls meiotic double-strand-break formation.

Authors:  Julian Lange; Jing Pan; Francesca Cole; Michael P Thelen; Maria Jasin; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Drosophila ATM and ATR have distinct activities in the regulation of meiotic DNA damage and repair.

Authors:  Eric F Joyce; Michael Pedersen; Stanley Tiong; Sanese K White-Brown; Anshu Paul; Shelagh D Campbell; Kim S McKim
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  96 in total

Review 1.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination.

Authors:  Maria Jasin; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Genomic features shaping the landscape of meiotic double-strand-break hotspots in maize.

Authors:  Yan He; Minghui Wang; Stefanie Dukowic-Schulze; Adele Zhou; Choon-Lin Tiang; Shay Shilo; Gaganpreet K Sidhu; Steven Eichten; Peter Bradbury; Nathan M Springer; Edward S Buckler; Avraham A Levy; Qi Sun; Jaroslaw Pillardy; Penny M A Kianian; Shahryar F Kianian; Changbin Chen; Wojciech P Pawlowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis.

Authors:  Denise Zickler; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Nuclear localization of PRDM9 and its role in meiotic chromatin modifications and homologous synapsis.

Authors:  Fengyun Sun; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Laura G Reinholdt; Jianjun Hu; Ruth L Saxl; Christopher L Baker; Petko M Petkov; Kenneth Paigen; Mary Ann Handel
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 6.  Double-strand break repair on sex chromosomes: challenges during male meiotic prophase.

Authors:  Lin-Yu Lu; Xiaochun Yu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Low levels of LTR retrotransposon deletion by ectopic recombination in the gigantic genomes of salamanders.

Authors:  Matthew Blake Frahry; Cheng Sun; Rebecca A Chong; Rachel Lockridge Mueller
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Crossing and zipping: molecular duties of the ZMM proteins in meiosis.

Authors:  Alexandra Pyatnitskaya; Valérie Borde; Arnaud De Muyt
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Hybrid Sterility with Meiotic Metaphase Arrest in Intersubspecific Mouse Crosses.

Authors:  Risako Nishino; Sabrina Petri; Mary Ann Handel; Tetsuo Kunieda; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  The Number of Meiotic Double-Strand Breaks Influences Crossover Distribution in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Ming Xue; Jun Wang; Luguang Jiang; Minghui Wang; Sarah Wolfe; Wojciech P Pawlowski; Yingxiang Wang; Yan He
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 11.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.