Literature DB >> 22002603

ATM controls meiotic double-strand-break formation.

Julian Lange1, Jing Pan, Francesca Cole, Michael P Thelen, Maria Jasin, Scott Keeney.   

Abstract

In many organisms, developmentally programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs) formed by the SPO11 transesterase initiate meiotic recombination, which promotes pairing and segregation of homologous chromosomes. Because every chromosome must receive a minimum number of DSBs, attention has focused on factors that support DSB formation. However, improperly repaired DSBs can cause meiotic arrest or mutation; thus, having too many DSBs is probably as deleterious as having too few. Only a small fraction of SPO11 protein ever makes a DSB in yeast or mouse and SPO11 and its accessory factors remain abundant long after most DSB formation ceases, implying the existence of mechanisms that restrain SPO11 activity to limit DSB numbers. Here we report that the number of meiotic DSBs in mouse is controlled by ATM, a kinase activated by DNA damage to trigger checkpoint signalling and promote DSB repair. Levels of SPO11-oligonucleotide complexes, by-products of meiotic DSB formation, are elevated at least tenfold in spermatocytes lacking ATM. Moreover, Atm mutation renders SPO11-oligonucleotide levels sensitive to genetic manipulations that modulate SPO11 protein levels. We propose that ATM restrains SPO11 via a negative feedback loop in which kinase activation by DSBs suppresses further DSB formation. Our findings explain previously puzzling phenotypes of Atm-null mice and provide a molecular basis for the gonadal dysgenesis observed in ataxia telangiectasia, the human syndrome caused by ATM deficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22002603      PMCID: PMC3213282          DOI: 10.1038/nature10508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


SPO11 creates DSBs via a covalent protein-DNA intermediate that is endonucleolytically cleaved to release SPO11 attached to a short oligonucleotide (oligo), freeing DSB ends for further processing and recombination[5] (Fig. 1a). SPO11-oligo complexes are a quantitative by-product of DSB formation that can be exploited to study DSB number and distribution[5-7] (Supplementary Fig. 1). We examined SPO11-oligo complexes by SPO11 immunoprecipitation and 3′-end-labeling of whole-testis extracts from Atm mutant mice, which display multiple catastrophic meiotic defects, including chromosome synapsis failure and apoptosis[8-12]. The Atm phenotype resembles that of mutants lacking DSB repair factors such as DMC1, indicating that absence of ATM causes meiotic recombination defects. While Spo11 mutation is epistatic to Atm (refs 11,12), the functional relationship between ATM and SPO11 is complex, as meiotic defects of Atm mice are substantially rescued by reducing Spo11 gene dosage[13,14] (discussed below).
Figure 1

SPO11 activity and expression in the absence of ATM

a) SPO11 attacks the DNA phospohodiester backbone, forming a covalent intermediate with the 5′ strand termini of the DSB. Endonucleolytic cleavage removes SPO11 covalently attached to an oligonucleotide.

b, c) Steady-state levels of SPO11-oligo complexes are elevated in Atm testes (b), but are decreased in Dmc1 testes (c). SPO11 immunoprecipitates from extracts of whole adult testes were treated with terminal transferase and [α-32P] dCTP, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to a membrane. Representative experiments using littermates of the indicated genotypes are shown. Upper panel, autoradiograph; lower panel, anti-SPO11 western detection. Bars, SPO11-specific signals; asterisk, non-specific terminal transferase labeling; arrowheads, migration position of immunoglobulin heavy chain.

d) Treatment of labeled SPO11 immunoprecipitates with benzonase does not detectably alter levels of free SPO11, but this sequence non-specific nuclease efficiently removes the 3′-end label (compare lanes ± benzonase), and was previously shown to completely remove DNA covalently bound to yeast Spo11 (ref. 1).

Unexpectedly, we found that adult Atm testes exhibited an ~ten-fold elevation in steady-state levels of SPO11-oligo complexes relative to wild-type littermates (Fig. 1b) (11.3 ± 4.5-fold, mean and s.d., n=7 littermate pairs). This finding contrasts with Dmc1 testes, which displayed a ~50% reduction in SPO11-oligo complexes (0.51 ± 0.06-fold relative to wild type, n=5) (Fig. 1c), as previously shown[5,7]. The mutants share similar arrest points in prophase I, as determined by molecular and histological data[12], thus increased SPO11-oligo complexes in Atm spermatocytes are not an indirect consequence of arrest or of an increased fraction of meiocytes harboring such complexes. In Atm testes, levels of free SPO11 (i.e., not bound to an oligo) were much lower than in wild type (Fig. 1b). This is not because a large fraction of SPO11 has been consumed in covalent complexes with DNA, which alters its electrophoretic mobility, as free SPO11 was not restored to wild-type levels by nuclease treatment (Fig. 1d). Instead, since Spo11 transcript levels in wild type are highest in later stages of meiotic prophase[15-18], after the arrest point of Atm cells, reduced free SPO11 is attributable to the lack of later meiotic cell types, consistent with the reduced free SPO11 also found in Dmc1 cells (Fig. 1c). As expected, the residual SPO11 protein in Atm, like Dmc1, testes was mostly SPO11β (Fig. 1b,c). SPO11α and SPO11β are major protein isoforms encoded by developmentally regulated splice variants; SPO11β is expressed earlier and is sufficient for nearly normal DSB levels[5,15,17-20]. Elevated SPO11-oligo complexes can be explained by an increased number of meiotic DSBs and/or a longer lifespan of complexes. To distinguish between these possibilities, we examined the initial appearance and persistence of SPO11-oligo complexes in juvenile mice, in which the first suite of spermatogenic cells proceeds through meiosis in a semi-synchronous fashion[21]. First, we assayed SPO11-oligo complexes in whole-testis extracts from wild-type C57BL/6J mice at post-natal days 7 to 24 (Fig. 2a). SPO11-oligo complexes first appeared between d9 and d10, when most cells of the initial cohort have entered leptonema. SPO11-oligo complexes persisted or increased slightly through d15, when the first cohort has progressed into pachynema. Levels rose still further from d16–d18, coincident with the second cohort of spermatogenic cells reaching leptonema[21]. Thus, SPO11-oligo complexes appear at the same time as cell types that experience the majority of meiotic DSBs. Consistent with findings in mutants (see above), only trace amounts of free SPO11 protein were seen when SPO11-oligo complexes first appeared, with SPO11β the predominant isoform at these times (Fig. 2a). Importantly, SPO11-oligo complex levels did not decline between the first and second spermatogenic cohorts. We infer that the lifespan of the complexes is long relative to the duration of prophase, and that an increased lifespan is not a likely explanation for the large increase in steady-state SPO11-oligos in adult Atm testes.
Figure 2

SPO11-oligo complexes from juvenile mice

a) SPO11-oligo complexes from testes of wild-type mice from post-natal days 7 to 24. Upper panel, autoradiograph; middle panel, quantification; lower panel, anti-SPO11 western detection.

b) SPO11-oligos are elevated in testes from juvenile Atm mice. Upper panel, autoradiograph; lower panel, anti-SPO11 western detection.

In support of this interpretation, we found that SPO11-oligo complexes were undetectable in Atm testes at d7 (data not shown) but were already elevated 3.3-fold compared with a wild-type littermate when they first appeared, increasing to 8.4-fold over wild type by d12 (Fig. 2b). Since Atm juveniles displayed higher SPO11-oligo levels as soon as the first leptotene cells appeared, we conclude that most, if not all, of the increase reflects a greater number of meiotic DSBs occurring during prophase I. Meiotic defects of mice lacking ATM are substantially suppressed by reducing Spo11 gene dosage: Spo11 spermatocytes pair and recombine their autosomes and progress through meiotic prophase to metaphase I, where they arrest due to a failure in sex chromosome pairing and recombination[13,14]. The reason for this puzzling rescue was unknown, but our current findings suggest an explanation: the majority of meiotic defects in Atm-null spermatocytes are caused by grossly elevated DSB levels, which are lowered by Spo11 heterozygosity (which reduces SPO11 protein levels by half in adult and juvenile testes (ref. 17 and our unpublished data). Indeed, we found SPO11-oligo complexes in Spo11 mice to be substantially reduced compared with Atm littermates (Fig. 3a). The remaining increase in SPO11-oligo complexes in Spo11 mutants compared with wild type (range of 4.5- to 7.8-fold, n=2) is not simply a consequence of metaphase arrest, because SPO11-oligo complexes were not elevated in mice that exhibit a similar arrest point due to absence of MLH1, a protein involved late in recombination[22] (Fig. 3a). The fact that DSBs are still elevated in Spo11 spermatocytes relative to wild type may account for some or all of the remaining defects in this mutant, including axis interruptions at sites of ongoing recombination and persistent unrepaired DSBs late in prophase I (ref. 14).
Figure 3

Spo11 gene dosage modulates SPO11-oligo complex levels in Atm-deficient spermatocytes

a) SPO11-oligo complexes are reduced in Spo11 testes relative to Atm, but are more abundant than in wild type or in an Mlh1 mutant, which similarly arrests at metaphase. Consistent with further meiotic progression than Atm, both SPO11 isoforms (α and β) are expressed in Spo11 testes, although at reduced levels due to Spo11 heterozygosity. Dagger, lower-mobility polypeptides likely originating from the Spo11 knockout allele[18].

b) SPO11-oligo complexes are further elevated by SPO11β expression from the Xmr-Spo11β transgene[18] in Atm spermatocytes. Introducing this transgene into an otherwise wild-type background only modestly increased SPO11-oligo complex levels.

Our findings indicate that the absence of ATM renders the extent of DSB formation sensitive to SPO11 expression levels. Therefore, we reasoned that increasing SPO11 expression should further elevate DSB formation in ATM-deficient cells. To test this prediction, we used a previously described transgene (Xmr-Spo11β) that expresses the SPO11β isoform[18]. Indeed, there was substantial further elevation of SPO11-oligo complex levels (20.9 ± 1.5-fold over wild-type littermates, n=3) upon introduction of this transgene in an Atm-null background with intact endogenous Spo11 (Fig. 3b). By contrast, the transgene resulted in only a modest increase in SPO11-oligo complexes in an ATM-proficient background (1.1 ± 0.05-fold, n=3) (Fig. 3b). SPO11-oligo complexes from Atm-null testes were consistently shifted to a higher electrophoretic mobility compared to wild type or other mutants (Figs 1, 2b, 3). To examine the distribution of oligo lengths, labeled complexes were protease-digested and the resulting oligos were electrophoresed on a high-resolution gel (Fig. 4a). As previously shown[5], SPO11-oligos from wild type have a bimodal length distribution with prominent subpopulations at apparent sizes of ~15–27 and ~31–35 nucleotides. Atm mice showed a different pattern with or without the Spo11 transgene: oligos in the shorter size range were less abundant relative to the ~31–35 nucleotide class, and longer oligos appeared, including an abundant class of ~40–70 nucleotides and a subpopulation that ranged to >300 nucleotides. Spo11 mice displayed an intermediate pattern, with more pronounced enrichment of the ~31–35 nucleotide class relative to both smaller and longer oligos. These results suggest that ATM influences an early step in nucleolytic processing of meiotic DSBs, as has been proposed in yeast[23]. In principle, altered oligo sizes could reflect changes in preferred positions of the endonucleolytic cleavage that releases the SPO11-oligo complex, effects on 3′→5′ exonucleolytic digestion of SPO11-oligos after they are formed, or occurrence of SPO11-induced DSBs at adjacent positions on the same DNA duplex (M. Neale, personal communication). Resection defects and adjacent DSBs (which conventional cytology would be unable to resolve) are both possible explanations for why SPO11-oligo complexes in Atm spermatocytes show a greater increase than RAD51 focus numbers[14].
Figure 4

Roles of ATM in DSB formation and processing

a) SPO11-oligo length distribution is altered in Atm spermatocytes. End-labeled SPO11-oligo complexes were treated with protease to digest the bound protein prior to electrophoresis on denaturing PAGE. Left panel, autoradiograph; right panel, background-subtracted lane traces normalized to total signal within each lane. Asterisk, autoradiograph background. Each lane contains SPO11-oligos from the equivalent of different numbers of mice in order to better compare sizes: Atm, 15 mice; Atm, 2 mice; Spo11, 4 mice; Atm plus transgene, 2 mice; Spo11, 2 mice; mock, 15 wild-type mice.

b) Negative feedback loop by which ATM regulates meiotic DSB levels. DSBs generated by SPO11 activate the ATM kinase, inhibiting further DSB formation. ATM may also have roles in repair of DSBs by homologous recombination, for example, by promoting DSB end-resection.

Our results reveal an essential but previously unsuspected function for ATM in controlling the number of SPO11-generated DSBs. We suggest that activation of ATM by DSBs triggers a negative feedback loop that leads to inhibition of further DSB formation (Fig. 4b) via phosphorylation of SPO11 or its accessory proteins, several of which are known to be phosphorylated in budding yeast (e.g., ref. 24) and are conserved in mammals[2]. ATM is activated in the vicinity of DSBs, as judged by SPO11- and ATM-dependent appearance of γH2AX (phosphorylated histone variant H2AX) on chromosomes at leptonema[12,13,25]. Thus, we envision that the negative feedback loop operates at least in part at a local level, perhaps discouraging additional DSBs from forming close to where a DSB has already formed. Such a mechanism could minimize instances where both sister chromatids are cut in the same region, and could also promote more even spacing of DSBs along chromosomes. These studies provide a new molecular framework for understanding the gonadal phenotypes of patients with ataxia telangiectasia[26], which is caused by ATM deficiency[27].

Methods Summary

Mouse mutant alleles and the Spo11β transgene were previously described[10,18,28-30]. Experimental animals were compared with controls from the same litter. Experiments conformed to regulatory standards and were approved by the MSKCC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. For measurement of SPO11-oligo complexes, both testes from each mouse were used per experiment, i.e., littermate comparisons were made on a per-testis basis (Supplementary Fig. 1). Testis extract preparation, immunoprecipitation, and western analysis were performed essentially as described[7]. Radiolabeled species were quantified with Fuji phosphor screens and ImageGuage software. The anti-mSPO11 monoclonal antibody was produced from hybridoma cell line 180 (M.P.T., unpublished). The size distribution of SPO11-oligos was determined essentially as described[5] after radiolabeling with [α-32P] cordycepin. Benzonase treatment of SPO11-oligo complexes followed manufacturer’s instructions (Novagen).

Methods

Testes were decapsulated, then lysed in 800 µl lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 400 mM NaCl, 25 mM HEPES-NaOH at pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA). Lysates were centrifuged at 100,000 rpm (355,040 g) for 25 min in a TLA100.2 rotor. Supernatants were incubated with anti-mSPO11 antibody 180 (5 µg per pair of testes) at 4°C for 1 h, followed by addition of 30–40 µl protein-A–agarose beads (Roche) and incubation for another 3 h. Beads were washed three times with IP buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 15 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.0). Immunoprecipitates were eluted with Laemmli sample buffer and diluted 6- to 7-fold in IP buffer. Eluates were incubated with additional anti-mSPO11 antibody 180 at 4°C for 1 h, followed by addition of 30–40 µl protein-A–agarose beads and incubation at 4°C overnight. Beads were washed three times with IP buffer and twice with buffer NEB4 (New England BioLabs). SPO11-oligo complexes were radiolabeled at 37°C for 1 h using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Fermentas) and [α-32P] dCTP. Beads were washed three times with IP buffer, boiled in Laemmli sample buffer and fractionated on 8% SDS–PAGE. Complexes were transferred to a PVDF membrane by semi-dry transfer (Bio-Rad). Radiolabeled species were detected and quantified with Fuji phosphor screens and ImageGuage software. For western analysis, membranes were probed with anti-mSPO11 antibody 180 (1:2,000 in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% non-fat dry milk), then horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated protein A (Abcam; 1:10,000 in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% non-fat dry milk), and detected using the ECL+ reagent (GE Healthcare). The size distribution of SPO11-oligos was determined by radiolabeling with [α-32P] cordycepin then protease digestion followed by denaturing PAGE. Benzonase treatment of SPO11-oligo complexes was performed per manufacturer’s instructions (Novagen). This figure shows a series of experiments that demonstrate the high precision, low experimental variability, and low animal-to-animal variation in the SPO11-oligo labeling assay
  28 in total

1.  Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis.

Authors:  S K Mahadevaiah; J M Turner; F Baudat; E P Rogakou; P de Boer; J Blanco-Rodríguez; M Jasin; S Keeney; W M Bonner; P S Burgoyne
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Differential gene expression of mammalian SPO11/TOP6A homologs during meiosis.

Authors:  M Shannon; L Richardson; A Christian; M A Handel; M P Thelen
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-12-03       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11.

Authors:  F Baudat; K Manova; J P Yuen; M Jasin; S Keeney
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis.

Authors:  P J Romanienko; R D Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Cloning, characterization, and localization of mouse and human SPO11.

Authors:  P J Romanienko; R D Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Meiotic pachytene arrest in MLH1-deficient mice.

Authors:  W Edelmann; P E Cohen; M Kane; K Lau; B Morrow; S Bennett; A Umar; T Kunkel; G Cattoretti; R Chaganti; J W Pollard; R D Kolodner; R Kucherlapati
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-06-28       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Meiotic homologue alignment and its quality surveillance are controlled by mouse HORMAD1.

Authors:  Katrin Daniel; Julian Lange; Khaled Hached; Jun Fu; Konstantinos Anastassiadis; Ignasi Roig; Howard J Cooke; A Francis Stewart; Katja Wassmann; Maria Jasin; Scott Keeney; Attila Tóth
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase.

Authors:  K Savitsky; A Bar-Shira; S Gilad; G Rotman; Y Ziv; L Vanagaite; D A Tagle; S Smith; T Uziel; S Sfez; M Ashkenazi; I Pecker; M Frydman; R Harnik; S R Patanjali; A Simmons; G A Clines; A Sartiel; R A Gatti; L Chessa; O Sanal; M F Lavin; N G Jaspers; A M Taylor; C F Arlett; T Miki; S M Weissman; M Lovett; F S Collins; Y Shiloh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Meiotic prophase abnormalities and metaphase cell death in MLH1-deficient mouse spermatocytes: insights into regulation of spermatogenic progress.

Authors:  Shannon Eaker; John Cobb; April Pyle; Mary Ann Handel
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Spermatogenic cells of the prepuberal mouse. Isolation and morphological characterization.

Authors:  A R Bellvé; J C Cavicchia; C F Millette; D A O'Brien; Y M Bhatnagar; M Dym
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  127 in total

Review 1.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Juxtaposition of heterozygous and homozygous regions causes reciprocal crossover remodelling via interference during Arabidopsis meiosis.

Authors:  Piotr A Ziolkowski; Luke E Berchowitz; Christophe Lambing; Nataliya E Yelina; Xiaohui Zhao; Krystyna A Kelly; Kyuha Choi; Liliana Ziolkowska; Viviana June; Eugenio Sanchez-Moran; Chris Franklin; Gregory P Copenhaver; Ian R Henderson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  Double-strand break repair on sex chromosomes: challenges during male meiotic prophase.

Authors:  Lin-Yu Lu; Xiaochun Yu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  MEI4 – a central player in the regulation of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation in the mouse.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Norbert Ghyselinck; Kei-ichiro Ishiguro; Yoshinori Watanabe; Anna Kouznetsova; Christer Höög; Edward Strong; John Schimenti; Katrin Daniel; Attila Toth; Bernard de Massy
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  ATM and ATR Influence Meiotic Crossover Formation Through Antagonistic and Overlapping Functions in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Wei Li; Judith L Yanowitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Control of meiotic double-strand-break formation by ATM: local and global views.

Authors:  Agnieszka Lukaszewicz; Julian Lange; Scott Keeney; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Physical basis for long-distance communication along meiotic chromosomes.

Authors:  Kyle R Fowler; Randy W Hyppa; Gareth A Cromie; Gerald R Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  BRUCE preserves genomic stability in the male germline of mice.

Authors:  Lixiao Che; Kris G Alavattam; Peter J Stambrook; Satoshi H Namekawa; Chunying Du
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 9.  Sex chromosome inactivation in germ cells: emerging roles of DNA damage response pathways.

Authors:  Yosuke Ichijima; Ho-Su Sin; Satoshi H Namekawa
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 10.  Brd4 shields chromatin from ATM kinase signaling storms.

Authors:  Serah Choi; Christopher J Bakkenist
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 8.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.