| Literature DB >> 23596526 |
Gerasimos F Kremmydas1, Anastasia P Tampakaki, Dimitrios G Georgakopoulos.
Abstract
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain X, a bacterial isolate from the rhizosphere of bean seedlings, has the ability to suppress damping-off caused by the oomycete Pythium ultimum. To determine the genes controlling the biocontrol activity of strain X, transposon mutagenesis, sequencing and complementation was performed. Results indicate that, biocontrol ability of this isolate is attributed to gcd gene encoding glucose dehydrogenase, genes encoding its co-enzyme pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ), and two genes (sup5 and sup6) which seem to be organized in a putative operon. This operon (named supX) consists of five genes, one of which encodes a non-ribosomal peptide synthase. A unique binding site for a GntR-type transcriptional factor is localized upstream of the supX putative operon. Synteny comparison of the genes in supX revealed that they are common in the genus Pseudomonas, but with a low degree of similarity. supX shows high similarity only to the mangotoxin operon of Ps. syringae pv. syringae UMAF0158. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis indicated that transcription of supX is strongly reduced in the gcd and PQQ-minus mutants of Ps. fluorescens strain X. On the contrary, transcription of supX in the wild type is enhanced by glucose and transcription levels that appear to be higher during the stationary phase. Gcd, which uses PQQ as a cofactor, catalyses the oxidation of glucose to gluconic acid, which controls the activity of the GntR family of transcriptional factors. The genes in the supX putative operon have not been implicated before in the biocontrol of plant pathogens by pseudomonads. They are involved in the biosynthesis of an antimicrobial compound by Ps. fluorescens strain X and their transcription is controlled by glucose, possibly through the activity of a GntR-type transcriptional factor binding upstream of this putative operon.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23596526 PMCID: PMC3626644 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of sup− mutants and complementation analysis.
| Strain | Acidification |
|
| Antimicrobial activity of PDB filtrates after treatment with proteinase K and pronase |
| X | + | + | − | + |
| k36/pBBRgcd1 | + | + | − | + |
| k36 | − | − | − | − |
| W139/pBBRgcd1 | + | + | − | + |
| W139 | − | − | − | − |
| R48/pBBRgcd1 | + | + | − | + |
| R48 | − | − | − | − |
| B163/pBBRpqqF-E | + | + | − | + |
| B163 | − | − | − | − |
| B91/pBBRpqqF-E | + | + | − | + |
| B91 | − | − | − | − |
| A150/pBBRpqqF-E | + | + | − | + |
| A150 | − | − | − | − |
| ρ26/pBBRpqqF-E | + | + | − | + |
| ρ26 | − | − | − | − |
| δ40/pBBRsupD | ND | + | − | + |
| δ40 | ND | − | − | − |
| ρ93/pBBRsupD | ND | + | − | + |
| ρ93 | ND | − | − | − |
ND: Not Detected.
Acidification was observed on solid minimal medium M9 supplemented with 2% w/v glucose, as described before [14].
Enzyme treatment was performed for filtrates from incubation in PDB, as described before [47].
Figure 1Complementation analysis of the PQQ biosynthesis region in Ps. fluorescens strain X.
PCR fragments of this region (1–5), with different sets of genes from Ps. fluorescens X, and their ability to complement sup− mutants. Ability to complement is noted with plus (+) or minus (−). The direction of the plasposon Tn5-RL27 insertion in the derivative mutants B91, B163, A150 and ρ26 is indicated with a flag beneath the sequence. The predicted site for the unique putative promoter is also marked.
Figure 2Arrangement of the genes in the genomic locus of sup5 and sup6, compared to other Pseudomonas strains, and complementation analysis of the region.
The lines beneath the genomic of Ps. fluorescens X represent regions of this locus that were PCR-amplified, cloned into pBBR1MCS5 and tested for complementation. Ability to complement is noted with plus (+) or minus (−). Putative ORFs are indicated by thick coloured arrows on a line. Genes that might be organised in a putative operon are enclosed by a grey frame. The direction of the plasposon Tn5-RL27 insertion in mutants δ40 and ρ93 is indicated with a black arrow beneath the sequence (▸). Predicted sites for the unique putative promoter and operator are also marked (;). Size, genomic location and locus tag of the different ORFs sequenced in Ps. aeruginosa PA7, Ps. fluorescens Pf0–1, Ps. fluorescens SBW25, Ps. entomophila L48, Ps. syringae pv. syringae B728a,Ps. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and Ps. syringae pv. syringae UMAF0158 are indicated.
Figure 3Expression levels of sup5, sup6 and orf8 in cells of Ps. fluorescens strain X and the mutants ρ26 and k36.
The expression of sup5, sup6 and orf8 was measured using rpoD as the housekeeping gene standard. Results are shown as relative expression levels compared to the expression in the wild type in LB during stationary phase. (A) Expression in the wild type grown in LB, at stationary phase; (B) Expression in the wild type grown in PDB, at stationary phase; (C) Expression in mutant k36 grown in PDB, at stationary phase; (D) Expression in mutant ρ26 grown in PDB, at stationary phase; (E) Expression in the wild type grown in LB, at exponential phase; (F) Expression in the wild type strain grown in PDB, at exponential phase. For each time point, mean values of three replicates are given; the error bars represent the standard errors of the mean.
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotides used in this study.
| Strain, plasmid, oroligonucleotide | Characteristics or sequence (5′→3′) | Reference and/or source | ||
|
| ||||
| DH10b | F−, mcrA, Δ( |
| ||
| DH5 |
|
| ||
| HB101 |
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| X | wild type |
| ||
| Xrif | RifR (spontaneous mutant) | This study | ||
| A150 | Xrif derivative, sup3::Tn5-RL27 KmR, sup− | This study | ||
| B91 | Xrif derivative, sup2::Tn5-RL27 KmR, sup− | This study | ||
| B163 | Xrif derivative, sup4::Tn5-RL27 KmR, sup− | This study | ||
| ρ93 | Xrif derivative,, sup5::Tn5-RL27 KmR, sup− | This study | ||
| ρ26 | Xrif derivative, sup4::Tn5-RL27 KmR, sup− | This study | ||
| k36 | Xrif derivative, sup1::Tn5-RL27 KmR, sup− | This study | ||
| R48 | Xrif derivative, sup1::Tn5-RL27 KmR, sup− | This study | ||
| W139 | Xrif derivative, sup1::Tn5-RL27 KmR, sup− | This study | ||
| δ40 | Xrif derivative, sup6::Tn5-RL27 KmR, sup− | This study | ||
|
| ||||
| pBBRgcd1 | pBBR1MCS5/sup1 | This study | ||
| pBBRgcd2 | pBBR1MCS5/sup1 | This study | ||
| pBBRpqqF | pBBR1MCS5/sup2 | This study | ||
| pBBRpqqE | pBBR1MCS5/sup3 | This study | ||
| pBBRpqqD | pBBR1MCS5/sup4 | This study | ||
| pBBRpqqDE | pBBR1MCS5/sup3–4 | This study | ||
| pBBRpqqFA | pBBR1MCS5/sup2-orf1 | This study | ||
| pBBRpqqFAB | pBBR1MCS5sup2-orf1-orf2 | This study | ||
| pBBRpqqABCDE | pBBR1MCS5/orf1–3,sup3–4 | This study | ||
| pBBRpqqF-E | pBBR1MCS5/sup2–4 | This study | ||
| pBBRsup5–6 | pBBR1MCS5/sup5–6 | This study | ||
| pBBRsupA | pBBR1MCS5/sup6-orf7-orf8-orf9 | This study | ||
| pBBRsupD | pBBR1MCS5/sup5-sup6-orf7-orf8-orf9 | This study | ||
| pRK2013 | IncP-I, |
| ||
| pRL27 | vector of Tn5-RL27 (KmR-oriR6 K) |
| ||
|
| ||||
| gcd1 | TCGggtaccTGAGCATTGCGTTC | This study | ||
| gcd3 | TCGtctagaCGCCAGCGTTGCTTAATCTG; | This study | ||
| FOR2 | TTTGGgaatccTGACCACTCGATGTTCAGC; | This study | ||
| pqqE2 | GTACATCATCgaatccCGTTGAGGCGCTCA; | This study | ||
| supFor | CAGCtctagaGGGAACTTGATGG; | This study | ||
| supRev | GCCTCCGCCTGCtctagaTATGTC; | This study | ||
| δ40α | CAGTGcGTGCGTcatatgAACTTCGAAGTG; | This study | ||
| δ40β | CCTTtctagaTGATACTCAGTAGTAGTGC; | This study | ||
| ρ93α | GATAAGGAGCGCcatatgGAAGATAAAAAG; | This study | ||
| rpoDf |
| This study | ||
| rpoDr |
| This study | ||
| rpoBf |
| This study | ||
| rpoBr |
| This study | ||
| sup6f |
| This study | ||
| sup6r |
| This study | ||
| sup5f |
| This study | ||
| sup5r |
| This study | ||
| orf8f |
| This study | ||
| orf8r |
| This study | ||
includes the sequence of the putative predicted promoter.
In the nucleotide sequences, restriction enzyme sites are shown in lowercase letters.