Literature DB >> 23596202

Development of a prognostic model for breast cancer survival in an open challenge environment.

Wei-Yi Cheng1, Tai-Hsien Ou Yang, Dimitris Anastassiou.   

Abstract

The accuracy with which cancer phenotypes can be predicted by selecting and combining molecular features is compromised by the large number of potential features available. In an effort to design a robust prognostic model to predict breast cancer survival, we hypothesized that signatures consisting of genes that are coexpressed in multiple cancer types should correspond to molecular events that are prognostic in all cancers, including breast cancer. We previously identified several such signatures--called attractor metagenes--in an analysis of multiple tumor types. We then tested our attractor metagene hypothesis as participants in the Sage Bionetworks-DREAM Breast Cancer Prognosis Challenge. Using a rich training data set that included gene expression and clinical features for breast cancer patients, we developed a prognostic model that was independently validated in a newly generated patient data set. We describe our model, which was based on three attractor metagenes associated with mitotic chromosomal instability, mesenchymal transition, or lymphocyte-based immune recruitment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23596202     DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  60 in total

Review 1.  Systems biology: perspectives on multiscale modeling in research on endocrine-related cancers.

Authors:  Robert Clarke; John J Tyson; Ming Tan; William T Baumann; Lu Jin; Jianhua Xuan; Yue Wang
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.678

2.  Clinically relevant modeling of tumor growth and treatment response.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Nkiruka Atuegwu; David Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Crowdsourced contest identifies best-in-class breast cancer prognostic.

Authors:  Michael Eisenstein
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Systematic assessment of analytical methods for drug sensitivity prediction from cancer cell line data.

Authors:  In Sock Jang; Elias Chaibub Neto; Juistin Guinney; Stephen H Friend; Adam A Margolin
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2014

5.  JAK2 expression is associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and improved breast cancer outcomes: implications for evaluating JAK2 inhibitors.

Authors:  Chris P Miller; Jason D Thorpe; Amanda N Kortum; Catherine M Coy; Wei-Yi Cheng; Tai-Hsien Ou Yang; Dimitris Anastassiou; J David Beatty; Nicole D Urban; C Anthony Blau
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 11.151

Review 6.  Principles and methods of integrative genomic analyses in cancer.

Authors:  Vessela N Kristensen; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Hege G Russnes; Hans Kristian M Vollan; Arnoldo Frigessi; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Phenomapping for novel classification of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Sanjiv J Shah; Daniel H Katz; Senthil Selvaraj; Michael A Burke; Clyde W Yancy; Mihai Gheorghiade; Robert O Bonow; Chiang-Ching Huang; Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Accurate and dynamic predictive model for better prediction in medicine and healthcare.

Authors:  H O Alanazi; A H Abdullah; K N Qureshi; A S Ismail
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Signal-Oriented Pathway Analyses Reveal a Signaling Complex as a Synthetic Lethal Target for p53 Mutations.

Authors:  Songjian Lu; Chunhui Cai; Gonghong Yan; Zhuan Zhou; Yong Wan; Vicky Chen; Lujia Chen; Gregory F Cooper; Lina M Obeid; Yusuf A Hannun; Adrian V Lee; Xinghua Lu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.