Literature DB >> 28756541

Accurate and dynamic predictive model for better prediction in medicine and healthcare.

H O Alanazi1,2, A H Abdullah1, K N Qureshi3, A S Ismail1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Information and communication technologies (ICTs) have changed the trend into new integrated operations and methods in all fields of life. The health sector has also adopted new technologies to improve the systems and provide better services to customers. Predictive models in health care are also influenced from new technologies to predict the different disease outcomes. However, still, existing predictive models have suffered from some limitations in terms of predictive outcomes performance. AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: In order to improve predictive model performance, this paper proposed a predictive model by classifying the disease predictions into different categories. To achieve this model performance, this paper uses traumatic brain injury (TBI) datasets. TBI is one of the serious diseases worldwide and needs more attention due to its seriousness and serious impacts on human life.
CONCLUSION: The proposed predictive model improves the predictive performance of TBI. The TBI data set is developed and approved by neurologists to set its features. The experiment results show that the proposed model has achieved significant results including accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Features; Outcomes; Prediction; Predictive models; Sensitivity; Specificity; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28756541     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-017-1655-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  11 in total

1.  Regularized linear discriminant analysis and its application in microarrays.

Authors:  Yaqian Guo; Trevor Hastie; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Prognostic factors versus predictive factors: Examples from a clinical trial of erlotinib.

Authors:  Gary M Clark
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. 1943.

Authors:  W S McCulloch; W Pitts
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Predicting long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury using repeated measurements of Glasgow Coma Scale and data mining methods.

Authors:  Hsueh-Yi Lu; Tzu-Chi Li; Yong-Kwang Tu; Jui-Chang Tsai; Hong-Shiee Lai; Lu-Ting Kuo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  A Critical Review for Developing Accurate and Dynamic Predictive Models Using Machine Learning Methods in Medicine and Health Care.

Authors:  Hamdan O Alanazi; Abdul Hanan Abdullah; Kashif Naseer Qureshi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Development of a prognostic model for breast cancer survival in an open challenge environment.

Authors:  Wei-Yi Cheng; Tai-Hsien Ou Yang; Dimitris Anastassiou
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 7.  A systematic review finds methodological improvements necessary for prognostic models in determining traumatic brain injury outcomes.

Authors:  Nino A Mushkudiani; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Adrián V Hernández; Gordon D Murray; Sung C Choi; Andrew I R Maas; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 8.  Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Pablo Perel; Phil Edwards; Reinhard Wentz; Ian Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Predictive modeling in pediatric traumatic brain injury using machine learning.

Authors:  Shu-Ling Chong; Nan Liu; Sylvaine Barbier; Marcus Eng Hock Ong
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Predicting outcomes in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers: artificial neural network modelling indicates a highly complex disease.

Authors:  K Søreide; K Thorsen; J A Søreide
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.693

View more
  4 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Diabetes Care: A Position Statement of the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists.

Authors:  Nicoletta Musacchio; Annalisa Giancaterini; Giacomo Guaita; Alessandro Ozzello; Maria A Pellegrini; Paola Ponzani; Giuseppina T Russo; Rita Zilich; Alberto de Micheli
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 2.  Using data mining techniques to fight and control epidemics: A scoping review.

Authors:  Reza Safdari; Sorayya Rezayi; Soheila Saeedi; Mozhgan Tanhapour; Marsa Gholamzadeh
Journal:  Health Technol (Berl)       Date:  2021-05-07

3.  SANE (Easy Gait Analysis System): Towards an AI-Assisted Automatic Gait-Analysis.

Authors:  Dario Sipari; Betsy D M Chaparro-Rico; Daniele Cafolla
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Predictive analysis of the number of human brucellosis cases in Xinjiang, China.

Authors:  Yanling Zheng; Liping Zhang; Chunxia Wang; Kai Wang; Gang Guo; Xueliang Zhang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.