BACKGROUND: The rising number of medical students and the impact this has on students' learning of clinical skills is a matter of concern. Cooperative learning in pairs, called dyad training, might help address this situation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dyad training on students' patient encounter skills. DESIGN: Experimental, randomized, observer-blinded trial. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine pre-clerkship medical students without prior clinical experience. INTERVENTION: All students underwent a 4-h course on how to manage patient encounters. Subsequently, the students were randomized into a dyad practice group (n = 24) or a single practice group (n = 25). Both groups practiced for 4 h on four different case scenarios, using simulated patients. Students in the dyad group practiced together and took turns as the active participant, whereas students in the single group practiced alone. MAIN MEASURE: Performance tests of patient encounter skills were conducted 2 weeks after the training by two blinded raters. Students had no clinical training during those weeks. A questionnaire-based evaluation surveyed students' confidence in their patient management skills. KEY RESULTS: The dyad group scored significantly higher on the performance test, mean 40.7 % (SD 6.6), than the single group, mean 36.9 % (SD 5.8), P = 0.04, effect size 0.61. Inter-rater reliability was 0.69. The dyad group expressed significantly higher confidence in managing future clinical patient encounters than the single group, mean 7.6 (SD 0.9) vs. mean 6.5 (SD 1.1), respectively, P < 0.001, effect size 1.16. CONCLUSION:Dyad training of pre-clerkship medical students' patient encounter skills is effective, efficient, and prompts higher confidence in managing future patient encounters compared to training alone. This training format may help maintain high-quality medical training in the face of an increasing number of students in medical schools.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The rising number of medical students and the impact this has on students' learning of clinical skills is a matter of concern. Cooperative learning in pairs, called dyad training, might help address this situation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dyad training on students' patient encounter skills. DESIGN: Experimental, randomized, observer-blinded trial. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine pre-clerkship medical students without prior clinical experience. INTERVENTION: All students underwent a 4-h course on how to manage patient encounters. Subsequently, the students were randomized into a dyad practice group (n = 24) or a single practice group (n = 25). Both groups practiced for 4 h on four different case scenarios, using simulated patients. Students in the dyad group practiced together and took turns as the active participant, whereas students in the single group practiced alone. MAIN MEASURE: Performance tests of patient encounter skills were conducted 2 weeks after the training by two blinded raters. Students had no clinical training during those weeks. A questionnaire-based evaluation surveyed students' confidence in their patient management skills. KEY RESULTS: The dyad group scored significantly higher on the performance test, mean 40.7 % (SD 6.6), than the single group, mean 36.9 % (SD 5.8), P = 0.04, effect size 0.61. Inter-rater reliability was 0.69. The dyad group expressed significantly higher confidence in managing future clinical patient encounters than the single group, mean 7.6 (SD 0.9) vs. mean 6.5 (SD 1.1), respectively, P < 0.001, effect size 1.16. CONCLUSION: Dyad training of pre-clerkship medical students' patient encounter skills is effective, efficient, and prompts higher confidence in managing future patient encounters compared to training alone. This training format may help maintain high-quality medical training in the face of an increasing number of students in medical schools.
Authors: Charlotte Ringsted; Torben V. Schroeder; Jørgen Henriksen; Benedicte Ramsing; Peter Lyngdorf; Viggo Jønsson; Albert Scherpbier Journal: Med Teach Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Martin G Tolsgaard; Henrick Arendrup; Bjarne O Lindhardt; Jens G Hillingsø; Michael Stoltenberg; Charlotte Ringsted Journal: Acad Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Brita Roy; Lisa L Willett; Carol Bates; Briar Duffy; Kathel Dunn; Reena Karani; Shobhina G Chheda Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Conor Gilligan; Martine Powell; Marita C Lynagh; Bernadette M Ward; Chris Lonsdale; Pam Harvey; Erica L James; Dominique Rich; Sari P Dewi; Smriti Nepal; Hayley A Croft; Jonathan Silverman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-02-08
Authors: Martin G Tolsgaard; Rikke M H G Jepsen; Maria B Rasmussen; Lars Kayser; Uno Fors; Lars C Laursen; Jesper H Svendsen; Charlotte Ringsted Journal: Perspect Med Educ Date: 2016-02
Authors: Martin G Tolsgaard; Mette E Madsen; Charlotte Ringsted; Birgitte S Oxlund; Anna Oldenburg; Jette L Sorensen; Bent Ottesen; Ann Tabor Journal: Med Educ Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Ryan Romeo; Brian Blasiole; Thomas Chalifoux; Patricia Dalby; Robert Krohner; Tim Lyon; John Mahoney; William R McIvor; Kristin Ondecko Ligda; Rita Patel Journal: MedEdPORTAL Date: 2016-12-31