| Literature DB >> 28951408 |
Ying-Ying Yang1,2,3, Shuu-Jiun Wang1,4, Ling-Yu Yang1,5, Jiing-Feng Lirng1,4, Chia-Chang Huang1,2, Jen-Feng Liang1,5, Fa-Yauh Lee1,3,4, Shinn-Jang Hwang1,4, Chin-Chou Huang1,2, Ralph Kirby1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The primary healthcarecentre (PHCC) is the first place that medical students experience patient contact. Usually, medical students are frustrated by a lack of proper skills training for on-campus history taking (HT), physical examination (PE) and self-directed learning (SDL) to prepare for their PHCC and inhospital patient contact. For pre-clerks, this study aims to compare the effectiveness of PHCC training and PHCC training in combination with on-campus HT and PE training modules (PHCC+on-campus) on their clerkship preparedness.Entities:
Keywords: on-campus; patient-management; primary health care center; self-directed learning
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28951408 PMCID: PMC5623533 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Flowchart for the primary healthcare centre (PHCC) basic history taking (HT) and physical examination (PE) skills training module in academic year 2014. Both weekly PHCC and on-campus sessions were run as small groups (n=8) of pre-clerks and their specific faculty within 4 hours. At the second 7 week assignment based group learning stage, small group pre-clerks met twice, at the third and sixth weeks after the 7 week PHCC weekly sessions, with the same family physician for face to face discussions of their continuous group learning of HT and PE skills specific to the community contacted patients within their first stage (7 week PHCC sessions).GOSCE, group objective structured clinical examination; OSCE, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).
Figure 2Flow chart for the primary healthcare centre (PHCC) in combination with on-campus basic history taking (HT) and physical examination (PE) skills training module in academic year 2015.
Comparisons of the PHCC and PHCC+on-campus modules
| PHCC module | PHCC | |
| Weekly session hours | 4 | 4 |
| No of pre-clerks in each group | 8 | 8 |
| Cases in each weekly PE session | Varying number of real patient encounters in the community | No real patient encounters; two clinical scenarios by simulated patients |
| Weekly session faculties | One family medicine faculty lead small group students | Two IM faculty members lead and supervise the small group (n=8) practice with feedback/debriefing at the beginning and end of the session |
| Ways of weekly basic IM HT and PE skills practice | Grouped pre-clerks observe faculty conduct HT and PE skills followed by single practice | Dyad pre-trained learner’s demo and dyad pre-clerks take turns to practice three times, pre-trained pre-clerks feedback between each dyad practice |
| Time point to receive GOSCE after entering module (week) | 14 | 14 |
| Time point to receive OSCE after entering module (week) | 25 | 25 |
| Time points to complete self-assessed PHPQ after entering module (week) | 1, 14, 25 | 1, 14, 25 |
| No of enrolled pre-clerks (% among all pre-clerks of academic year) | 64 (67.8%) | 64 (68.4%) |
| Sex (men/women) | 45/19 | 44/20 |
| Age (years) | 23.8±2.9 | 26.1±1.3 |
| Previous experience* with HT training (yes/no) | 6/58 | 6/58 |
| Previous experience* with PE training (yes/no) | 3/61 | 4/60 |
*Defined as at least three previous formal training sessions for history taking/physical examination skills.
GOSCE, group objective structured clinical examination; HT, history taking; IM, internal medicine; OSCE, objective structured clinical examination; PE, physical examination; PHCC, primary healthcare centre; PHPQ, Preparation for Hospital Practice Questionnaire.
Five aspects of history taking and physical examination scores at the four station end of module GOSCE and the beginning of the clerkship OSCE
| Overall HT and PE skills across 4 GOSCE/OSCE stations | ||||||
| Five aspects in 4 GOSCE/OSCE stations | Communication | HT and PE technique | HT and PE sequence | Items content | Time controls | |
| PHCC module participants’ performance | Average of 8 grouped pre-clerks’ scores in GOSCE stations | 12.4 (3.9) | 13.8 (3.4) | 14.2 (2.7) | 15.7 (3.6) | 14.6 (2.2) |
| Average of 64 pre-clerks’ scores in OSCE stations | 13.1 (2.1) | 11.9 (2.2) | 15.1 (1.9) | 13.9 (1.8) | 12.1 (1.4) | |
| Overall trends (increase (↑), decrease (↓), similar (∼)) of follow-up OSCE scores compared with early GOSCE scores | ∼ | ↓ | ∼ | ↓ | ↓ | |
| PHCC+on-campus module participants’ performance (faculty led and student | Average of 8 grouped pre-clerks scores in GOSCE stations | 15.9 (5.4)* | 16.1 (5.1)* | 12.9 (2.5)* | 14.2 (3.9)* | 13.0 (2.7)* |
| Average of 64 pre-clerks’ scores in OSCE stations | 16.7 (3.2)* | 16.9 (2.9)* | 17.8 (3.1)* | 17.6 (2.8)* | 16.5 (4.8)* | |
| Overall trends of follow-up OSCE scores compared with early GOSCE scores | ∼ | ∼ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
Data are expressed as medium (IQR).
*p<0.05 vs PHCC participants’ performances. For each dyad (pre-clerks in GOCSE and a single clerk in OSCE), 5 aspects of HT and PE performance assessed by two raters are added in each station. So, for each dyad or single trainee, each aspect score will range from 4 to 20. In all 4 GOSCE/OSCE stations, the HT and PE performance in 5 HT and PE skills were assessed by Likert scale with 1=very inappropriate to 5=very appropriate.
GOSCE, group objective structured clinical examination; HT, history taking; OSCE, objective structured clinical examination; PE, physical examination; PHCC, primary healthcare centre.
Figure 3Distribution of (A) grouped pre-clerks’ end of pre-clerkship group objective structured clinical examination (GOSCE) and individual pre-clerk beginning of clerkship objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) scores of PHCC and PHCC+on-campus module participants. (B–D). Comparison the impact of primary healthcare centre (PHCC) and PHCC+on-campus history taking (HT) and physical examination (PE) training modules on the sequential changes of the self-assessed Preparation for Hospital Practice Questionnaire (PHPQ) scores for ‘confidence/coping,’ ‘patient management (PM)’ and ‘self-directed learning (SDL)’ subscales. (E–F). Mean PHPQ confidence/coping, PHPQ-PM and PHPQ-SDL scores among high OSCE pre-clerks (beginning of clerkship OSCE scores higher than mean level in the same module) and low OSCE pre-clerks. *p<0.05 vs pre-module score; #p<0.05, p<0.01 vs post-module score; †p<0.05 vs PHCC module pre-clerks data; ‡ p<0.05 vs low OSCE pre-clerks.
Grouped pre-clerks’ performance in end of pre-clerk module GOSCE/single clerk’ performance at beginning of clerkship OSCE
| Name of GOSCE/OSCE stations | H-N | CV | Chest | Abdomen | Overall | |
| PHCC module participants’ performance | Average grouped GOSCE score in each station | 72 (5) | 60.7 (4) | 65.1 (2.2) | 69.3 (5.4) | 267 (11) |
| Average grouped OSCE score in each station | 68 (4) | 61.3 (5) | 63.9 (4.7) | 64.7 (3.1) | 257 (16) | |
| Overall trends (increase (↑), decrease (↓), similar (∼)) of follow-up at the beginning of clerkship OSCE scores compared with end of pre-clerkship module GOSCE scores | ↓ | ∼ | ∼ | ↓ | ↓ | |
| PHCC+on-campus module participants’ performance (faculty led and student | Average grouped GOSCE score in each station | 77.6 (7.3)* | 69(3)* | 76(5)* | 75(7)* | 297.6 (12)* |
| Average grouped OSCE score in each station | 78.2 (4.1)* | 79(6)* | 86(7)* | 84(9)* | 329(28)* | |
| Overall trends of follow-up at the beginning of clerkship OSCE scores compared with end of pre-clerkship module GOSCE scores | ∼ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
Data are expressed as medium (IQR);
*p<0.05 vs PHCC participants’ scores. Each GOSCE/OSCE stations’ cumulative 5 aspects scores ranged from 20 to 100 points (table 2). Each paired pre-clerk needs to run 1 GOSCE station randomly (online supplemental table 2). So, every small group (n=8) will have 1 H-N, 1 CV, 1 chest and 1 abdomen GOSCE score and their specific overall GOSCE score is the addition of each of their 4 GOSCE stations’ scores. In contrast, each single clerk needs to run H-N, CV, chest and abdomen OSCE stations. After finishing 4 OSCE rotations by all group members (n=8), each clerk’s small group will have 8 H-N, 8 CV, 8 chest and 8 abdomen scores (online supplemental table 4). For analysis, the average of 8 H-V OSCE scores of 8 members is defined as the average H-V OSCE score for the specific small group. Then, overall group OSCE scores is the addition of the average H-V, CV, chest and abdomen OSCE scores of a specific small group. Notably, the average group GOSCE scores and group OSCE scores in the H-N, CV, chest and abdomen stations were the average of 8 small group scores.
C, cardiovascular; H-N, head and neck; GOSCE, group objective structured clinical examination; HT, history taking; OSCE, objective structured clinical examination; PE, physical examination; PHCC, primary healthcare centre.