Literature DB >> 23595099

[Structured reporting in radiology].

T Hackländer1.   

Abstract

The radiology report plays a key role in the radiological procedure and is used both for documentation of internal procedures as well as in a variety of communication processes within and outside the radiology department. Due to the various communication processes the question arises whether and how the report should be structured. The first stage of such a structured report implies a thematic structure only. This corresponds to the current practice in Germany whereby the reports are structured according to the X-ray act. In the second stage a structure of the contents is added, which is usually implemented by selecting predefined text modules. In the third stage the wording of the text modules is selected from controlled vocabularies, such as the RadLex which allows complete encoding of the report. Templates like this are provided by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) reporting initiative and are available to the general public. As advantages of structured reports of levels 2 and 3 it is expected that they provide a better structure and greater clarity of the findings to the referring physician. By using predefined blocks of text a higher degree of completeness and a shorter reporting time is expected. These benefits have been tested in several studies but have not yet yielded clear results. Within a radiology department the structured reports are communicated according to the integrating the healthcare enterprise (IHE) controlled reporting workflow as DICOM structured reports and outside radiology departments the reports are exchanged as CDA objects using HL7 standards.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23595099     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-013-2493-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  14 in total

1.  Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Benefits of the DICOM structured report.

Authors:  Rita Noumeir
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation.

Authors:  Annette J Johnson; Michael Y M Chen; J Shannon Swan; Kimberly E Applegate; Benjamin Littenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Toward best practices in radiology reporting.

Authors:  Charles E Kahn; Curtis P Langlotz; Elizabeth S Burnside; John A Carrino; David S Channin; David M Hovsepian; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The radiology report of the future: a summary of the 2007 Intersociety Conference.

Authors:  N Reed Dunnick; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Structured radiology reporting: are we there yet?

Authors:  Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  The radiology report--are we getting the message across?

Authors:  A Wallis; P McCoubrie
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting.

Authors:  David B Larson; Alex J Towbin; Rebecca M Pryor; Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The evolution of the X-ray report.

Authors:  R A Gagliardi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  [Standardizing the radiologic report -- norm DIN 6827-5].

Authors:  T Hackländer
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-10
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Reporting initiatives. An update on treatment in radiology].

Authors:  J-M Hempel; D Pinto dos Santos; R Kloeckner; C Dueber; P Mildenberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Current reporting in radiology : what will happen tomorrow?].

Authors:  T Baumann; T Hackländer; E Kotter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  [Teleradiology - update 2014].

Authors:  D Pinto dos Santos; J-M Hempel; R Kloeckner; C Düber; P Mildenberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  [Structured reporting and artificial intelligence].

Authors:  Johann-Martin Hempel; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  [Structured reporting in radiology : German and European radiology societies' point of view].

Authors:  Elmar Kotter; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 0.803

Review 6.  [Integration of structured reporting into the routine radiological workflow].

Authors:  Su Hwan Kim; Sanas Mir-Bashiri; Philipp Matthies; Wieland Sommer; Dominik Nörenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 0.635

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.