Literature DB >> 24989877

[Reporting initiatives. An update on treatment in radiology].

J-M Hempel1, D Pinto dos Santos, R Kloeckner, C Dueber, P Mildenberger.   

Abstract

The written radiological report is the most important means of communication between the radiologist and the referring medical doctor. There is no universal definition of a radiological report concerning its structure and content. The majority of clinicians and radiologists prefer structured reporting rather than free text reports of findings. Structured reporting does not increase the quality of a radiological report but has many advantages in research, teaching and quality management. Using standard RadLex terms facilitates translation and ontological assignment of a report. The Reporting Initiative of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) offers free and freely available extensively validated best practices radiology report templates in the new management of radiology report templates (MRRT) format according to the guidelines of the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE).

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24989877     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-014-2681-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  22 in total

1.  Structure and content of 400 CT reports in four teaching hospitals using a new, Windows-based software tool.

Authors:  K Heikkinen; M Löyttyniemi; M Kormano
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content.

Authors:  S S Naik; A Hanbidge; S R Wilson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Prepopulated radiology report templates: a prospective analysis of error rate and turnaround time.

Authors:  C M Hawkins; S Hall; J Hardin; S Salisbury; A J Towbin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials.

Authors:  Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  A framework for improving radiology reporting.

Authors:  Chris L Sistrom; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers.

Authors:  Jan M L Bosmans; Joost J Weyler; Paul M Parizel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys.

Authors:  Jan M L Bosmans; Joost J Weyler; Arthur M De Schepper; Paul M Parizel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  [Standardizing the radiologic report -- norm DIN 6827-5].

Authors:  T Hackländer
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-10

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  3 in total

1.  Conversion of Radiology Reporting Templates to the MRRT Standard.

Authors:  Charles E Kahn; Brad Genereaux; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Development of an IHE MRRT-compliant open-source web-based reporting platform.

Authors:  Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; G Klos; R Kloeckner; R Oberle; C Dueber; P Mildenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Basics and applications of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in radiology].

Authors:  F Jungmann; S Kuhn; B Kämpgen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 0.635

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.