Literature DB >> 23329657

Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting.

David B Larson1, Alex J Towbin, Rebecca M Pryor, Lane F Donnelly.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To successfully develop a department-wide standardized structured reporting program and achieve widespread adoption throughout the radiology department.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured reporting work group was formed in February 2010 to oversee development of standardized structured reports for a radiology department of 36 radiologists at a tertiary care children's hospital. The committee reached consensus on report organization and provided written guidelines and checklists for division representatives to aid in creation of the structured reports. Report drafts were reviewed by a subcommittee and revised until agreement was reached with the report author. Each report was vetted by all radiologists who would be using the report, and further revisions were made, as appropriate. Reports were then entered into the speech recognition system so that each report was associated with a procedure code or a group of codes from the radiology information system. This enabled automatic report population within the speech recognition system. The initiative was completed by September 2011. Quarterly audits were performed to evaluate for adherence to the standard report format and use of the normal report in cases in which the radiologist believed the study was normal. In August 2012, radiologists were surveyed as to their impressions of the structured reporting program.
RESULTS: A total of 228 standardized structured reports were created within 2 years after initiation of the project, corresponding to 199,000 (94%) of 212,000 departmental studies by volume. By the end of the implementation period in September 2011, all 223 (100%) audited reports adhered to the standard report format and 80 (99%) of 81 reports adhered to the normal report. Radiologist feedback was largely favorable.
CONCLUSION: Standardized department-wide structured reporting can be implemented in a radiology department, with a high rate of adoption by the radiologists. RSNA, 2013

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23329657     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12121502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  40 in total

1.  Standardized report template for indeterminate renal masses at CT and MRI: a collaborative product of the SAR Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Eric M Hu; Andrew Zhang; Atul B Shinagare; Andrew D Smith; Ivan Pedrosa; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-04

Review 2.  Natural Language Processing Technologies in Radiology Research and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Tianrun Cai; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Sheng Yu; Tatiana Kelil; Beth Ripley; Kanako K Kumamaru; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology? The importance of evidence-based datasets.

Authors:  D W Ellis; J Srigley
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Reply to Dr. Meyers et al regarding 'Beyond acute appendicitis: imaging of additional pathologies of the pediatric appendix'.

Authors:  Kelly R Dietz; Arnold C Merrow; Daniel J Podberesky; Alexander J Towbin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-24

5.  Conversion of Radiology Reporting Templates to the MRRT Standard.

Authors:  Charles E Kahn; Brad Genereaux; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Improving Radiology Report Quality by Rapidly Notifying Radiologist of Report Errors.

Authors:  Matthew J Minn; Arash R Zandieh; Ross W Filice
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Detecting Technical Image Quality in Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Thusitha Mabotuwana; Varun S Bhandarkar; Christopher S Hall; Martin L Gunn
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 8.  The state of structured reporting: the nuance of standardized language.

Authors:  Lindsey A G Shea; Alexander J Towbin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29

9.  Structured reporting in petrous bone MRI examinations: impact on report completeness and quality.

Authors:  Marco Armbruster; Sebastian Gassenmaier; Mareike Haack; Maximilian Reiter; Dominik Nörenberg; Thomas Henzler; Nora N Sommer; Wieland H Sommer; Franziska Braun
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Usage of structured reporting in radiological practice: results from an Italian online survey.

Authors:  Lorenzo Faggioni; Francesca Coppola; Riccardo Ferrari; Emanuele Neri; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.