| Literature DB >> 23593407 |
Shaomei He1, Natalia Ivanova, Edward Kirton, Martin Allgaier, Claudia Bergin, Rudolf H Scheffrahn, Nikos C Kyrpides, Falk Warnecke, Susannah G Tringe, Philip Hugenholtz.
Abstract
Termites effectively feed on many types of lignocellulose assisted by their gut microbial symbionts. To better understand the microbial decomposition of biomass with varied chemical profiles, it is important to determine whether termites harbor different microbial symbionts with specialized functionalities geared toward different feeding regimens. In this study, we compared the microbiota in the hindgut paunch of Amitermes wheeleri collected from cow dung and Nasutitermes corniger feeding on sound wood by 16S rRNA pyrotag, comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses. We found that Firmicutes and Spirochaetes were the most abundant phyla in A. wheeleri, in contrast to N. corniger where Spirochaetes and Fibrobacteres dominated. Despite this community divergence, a convergence was observed for functions essential to termite biology including hydrolytic enzymes, homoacetogenesis and cell motility and chemotaxis. Overrepresented functions in A. wheeleri relative to N. corniger microbiota included hemicellulose breakdown and fixed-nitrogen utilization. By contrast, glycoside hydrolases attacking celluloses and nitrogen fixation genes were overrepresented in N. corniger microbiota. These observations are consistent with dietary differences in carbohydrate composition and nutrient contents, but may also reflect the phylogenetic difference between the hosts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23593407 PMCID: PMC3625147 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Phylogenetic affiliation, relative abundance and habitat distribution of OTUs that are >0.5% of total bacterial community.
The bubble size represents the relative abundance of each OTU, and bubble color indicates the types of habitats where their closest relatives in the greengenes database were found. OTUs marked red were exclusively found in higher termites, orange OTUs were restricted to termites, including both higher and lower termites, green OTUs were also found in the guts and feces of other animals (e.g. cow, goat and elephant). Blue OTUs were found in other anoxic environments, such as anaerobic digesters.
Figure 2Key metabolic differences between cow dung- and wood-feeding termites based on gene and transcript abundance profiles.
In this schematic summary, intracellular and extracellular reactions are separated by a cell membrane, but these reactions do not necessarily all occur in one cell. Green or red thin lines (including rectangle outlines) indicate genes more abundant in the A. wheeleri or N. corniger metagenome, respectively. Green or red thick lines (including rectangle highlights) indicate transcripts more abundant in the A. wheeleri or N. corniger metatranscriptome, respectively. Black lines indicate equal representation in both termite genera.
Inventory of putative glycoside hydrolases (GHs) in plant cell wall degradation in termite hindguts and other environmentsa.
| CAZy family | pfam domain | Known activities |
|
|
| Compost | Tammar wallaby foregut | Cow rumen |
|
| ||||||||
| GH5*
| PF00150 | cellulase | 10.4 | 17.2 | 13.9 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 1.0 |
| GH6 | PF01341 | endoglucanase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 |
| GH7 | PF00840 | endoglucanase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
| GH9* | PF00759 | endoglucanase | 4.2 | 7.0 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 0 | 0.9 |
| GH44 | BLAST search | endoglucanase | 0.3 | 0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
| GH45 | PF02015 | endoglucanase | 0.8 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GH48 | PF02011 | endo-processive cellulase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||||||
| GH8* | PF01270 | endo-xylanase | 1.5 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| GH10 | PF00331 | endo-1,4-β-xylanase | 9.0 | 10.5 | 9.9 | 8.9 | 4.1 | 1.0 |
| GH11 | PF0457 | xylanase | 4.4 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0 | 0.1 |
| GH12 | PF01670 | endoglucanase & xyloglucan hydrolysis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 |
| GH26* | PF02156 | β-mannanase & xylanase | 1.4 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| GH28 | PF00295 | galacturonases | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| GH53* | PF07745 | endo-1,4-β-galactanase | 0.7 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||||||
| GH16 | PF00722 | xyloglucanases & xyloglycosyltransferases | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.1 |
| GH17 | PF00332 | 1,3-β-glucosidases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
| GH74 | BLAST search | endoglucanases & xyloglucanases | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0 |
| GH81 | PF03639 | 1,3-β-glucanase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||||||
| GH51** | BLAST search | α-L-arabinofuranosidase | 4.1 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 7.8 | 4.5 | 9.9 |
| GH54 | PF09206 | α-L-arabinofuranosidase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| GH62 | PF03664 | α-L-arabinofuranosidase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 |
| GH67 | PF07477, 07488, 03648 | α-glucuronidase | 2.5 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 0 |
| GH78** | PF05592 | α-L-rhamnosidase | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 8.1 | 9.3 | 5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||||||
| GH1 | PF00232 | β-glucosidase & other β-linked dimers | 2.8 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 9.2 | 22.7 | 1.8 |
| GH2** | PF00703, 02836, 02837 | β-galactosidases & other β-linked dimers | 15.7 | 7.1 | 13.6 | 8.6 | 8.9 | 28.5 |
| GH3** | PF00933, 01915 | mainly β-glucosidases | 17.4 | 15.1 | 15.5 | 12.2 | 26.8 | 26.6 |
| GH29** | PF01120 | α-L-fucosidase | 3.3 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 4.2 |
| GH35 | PF01301 | β-galactosidases & other β-linked dimers | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.9 |
| GH38 | PF01074, 07748 | α-mannosidase | 2.1 | 1.7 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 2.6 |
| GH39 | PF01229 | β-xylosidase | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| GH42* | PF02449, 08533, 08532 | β-galactosidase | 2.8 | 5.0 | 6.9 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.9 |
| GH43** | PF04616 | arabinases & xylosidases | 10.1 | 5.2 | 6.6 | 11.3 | 3.7 | 9.3 |
| GH52 | PF03512 | β-xylosidase | 0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
The listed value is the population abundance weighted relative abundance (%) of GH families among the total GHs included in the table used in Allgaier et al [28].
An improved version of assembly was used, leading to subtle differences in numbers from originally reported by Warnecke et al [6].
Percentages of GHs were directly from Allgaier et al [28].
GH gene counts were from Pope et al [29]and the percentages were renormalized by total number of GHs included in the table used in Allgaier et al [28], for comparison among these studies.
Percentages were calculated based on GH gene counts reported in Brulc et al [31].
No pfam domain is available and the identification is performed by BLAST search.
GHs over- (**) or under-represented (*) in A. wheeleri compared to the laboratory N. corniger (after adjusting for multiple hypothesis test, with a false discovery rate P-value cutoff of 0.05), and the difference was supported by the comparison between A. wheeleri and Costa Rican Nasutitermes sp.. The comparison was based on GH abundances normalized by the total abundance of GHs listed in this table.
Figure 3Taxonomic assignment of nickel-iron (NiFe) hydrogenases (a), the large subunit of iron-only (FeFe) hydrogenases (b), formyl tetrahydrofolate synthase (FTHFS) (c), and glycoside hydrolases family 3 (GH3) (d) by MEGAN using Blastp results against the NR database.