METHOD: This paper presents methods of measuring the longitudinal relaxation time using inversion recovery turbo spin echo (IR-TSE) and magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequences, comparing and optimizing these sequences, reporting T1 values for water protons measured from brain tissue at 1.5, 3, and 7 T. T1 was measured in cortical grey matter and white matter using the IR-TSE, MPRAGE, and inversion recovery echo planar imaging (IR-EPI) pulse sequences. RESULTS: In four subjects the T1 of white and grey matter were found to be 646+/-32 and 1,197+/-134 ms at 1.5 T, 838+/-50 and 1,607+/-112 ms at 3T, and 1,126+/-97, and 1,939+/-149 ms at 7 T with the MPRAGE sequence. The T1 of the putamen was found to be 1,084+/-63 ms at 1.5 T, 1,332+/-68 ms at 3T, and 1,644+/-167 ms at 7 T. The T1 of the caudate head was found to be 1,109+/- 66 ms at 1.5 T, 1,395+/-49 ms at 3T, and 1,684+/-76 ms at 7 T. DISCUSSION: There was a trend for the IR-TSE sequence to underestimate T1 in vivo. The sequence parameters for the IR-TSE and MPRAGE sequences were also optimized in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the fitted T1. The optimal sequence for IR-TSE in terms of SNR in the fitted T1 was found to have five readouts at TIs of 120, 260, 563, 1,221, 2,647, 5,736 ms and TR of 7 s. The optimal pulse sequence for MPRAGE with readout flip angle = 8 degrees was found to have five readouts at TIs of 160, 398, 988, 2,455, and 6,102 ms and a TR of 9 s. Further optimization including the readout flip angle suggests that the flip angle should be increased, beyond levels that are acceptable in terms of power deposition and point-spread function.
METHOD: This paper presents methods of measuring the longitudinal relaxation time using inversion recovery turbo spin echo (IR-TSE) and magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequences, comparing and optimizing these sequences, reporting T1 values for water protons measured from brain tissue at 1.5, 3, and 7 T. T1 was measured in cortical grey matter and white matter using the IR-TSE, MPRAGE, and inversion recovery echo planar imaging (IR-EPI) pulse sequences. RESULTS: In four subjects the T1 of white and grey matter were found to be 646+/-32 and 1,197+/-134 ms at 1.5 T, 838+/-50 and 1,607+/-112 ms at 3T, and 1,126+/-97, and 1,939+/-149 ms at 7 T with the MPRAGE sequence. The T1 of the putamen was found to be 1,084+/-63 ms at 1.5 T, 1,332+/-68 ms at 3T, and 1,644+/-167 ms at 7 T. The T1 of the caudate head was found to be 1,109+/- 66 ms at 1.5 T, 1,395+/-49 ms at 3T, and 1,684+/-76 ms at 7 T. DISCUSSION: There was a trend for the IR-TSE sequence to underestimate T1 in vivo. The sequence parameters for the IR-TSE and MPRAGE sequences were also optimized in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the fitted T1. The optimal sequence for IR-TSE in terms of SNR in the fitted T1 was found to have five readouts at TIs of 120, 260, 563, 1,221, 2,647, 5,736 ms and TR of 7 s. The optimal pulse sequence for MPRAGE with readout flip angle = 8 degrees was found to have five readouts at TIs of 160, 398, 988, 2,455, and 6,102 ms and a TR of 9 s. Further optimization including the readout flip angle suggests that the flip angle should be increased, beyond levels that are acceptable in terms of power deposition and point-spread function.
Authors: Hanzhang Lu; Lidia M Nagae-Poetscher; Xavier Golay; Doris Lin; Martin Pomper; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: William D Rooney; Glyn Johnson; Xin Li; Eric R Cohen; Seong-Gi Kim; Kamil Ugurbil; Charles S Springer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Wenna Duan; Parshant Sehrawat; Arvind Balachandrasekaran; Ashish B Bhumkar; Paresh B Boraste; James T Becker; Lewis H Kuller; Oscar L Lopez; H Michael Gach; Weiying Dai Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Revital Nossin-Manor; Andrew D Chung; Drew Morris; João P Soares-Fernandes; Bejoy Thomas; Hai-Ling M Cheng; Hilary E A Whyte; Margot J Taylor; John G Sled; Manohar M Shroff Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2010-12-16
Authors: Teresa R Franklin; Ze Wang; Joshua Shin; Kanchana Jagannathan; Jesse J Suh; John A Detre; Charles P O'Brien; Anna Rose Childress Journal: Brain Struct Funct Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.270
Authors: Michael L Alosco; John Gunstad; Xiaomeng Xu; Uraina S Clark; Donald R Labbe; Hannah H Riskin-Jones; Gretel Terrero; Nicolette F Schwarz; Edward G Walsh; Athena Poppas; Ronald A Cohen; Lawrence H Sweet Journal: J Am Soc Hypertens Date: 2014-04-13
Authors: Jonathan S Lin; Ken-Pin Hwang; Edward F Jackson; John D Hazle; R Jason Stafford; Brian A Taylor Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Edward J Auerbach; An T Vu; Steen Moeller; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Essa Yacoub; Kâmil Uğurbil Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 6.556