Literature DB >> 23590634

Conflicting and changing breast cancer screening recommendations: survey study of a national sample of ob-gyns after the release of the 2009 USPSTF guidelines.

Britta L Anderson1, Mark Pearlman, Jennifer Griffin, Jay Schulkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologists' (ob-gyns') use of multiple conflicting guidelines assess after the release of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) breast cancer screening recommendations. STUDY
DESIGN: A nationally representative sample of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Fellows were invited to complete a survey.
RESULTS: A total of 235 of 399 ob-gyns responded (59% response rate). Twenty percent and 89% indicated that USPSTF and ACOG guidelines influence their practice, respectively, 84% are influenced by more than one guideline. The plurality of respondents was able to correctly identify ACOG and USPSTF guidelines on 10 of 12 questions. One-third agreed with both ACOG's and USPSTF's recommendations regarding mammography screening for women 40-49 years old. A total of 42% of the sample made at least one change in their practice after the release of the 2009 USPSTF breast cancer screening guidelines.
CONCLUSION: Some ob-gyns made changes to their practices after the release of the USPSTF guidelines. When multiple guidelines exist, as in the case with breast cancer screening, physicians utilize multiple, and at times conflicting, guidelines. More research will be needed to better understand the impact (negative or positive) of multiple guidelines on the quality of healthcare.
© 2013 National Association for Healthcare Quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; evidence-based practice/guidelines; health promotion and screening; research quantitative

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23590634     DOI: 10.1111/jhq.12009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Qual        ISSN: 1062-2551            Impact factor:   1.095


  8 in total

1.  Use of Preoperative Testing and Physicians' Response to Professional Society Guidance.

Authors:  Alana E Sigmund; Elizabeth R Stevens; Jeanna D Blitz; Joseph A Ladapo
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Change in Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Since the 2009 USPSTF Guideline.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Robert F Arao; Rebecca A Hubbard; Brian L Sprague; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Jennifer S Haas; Louise Henderson; Deidre Hill; Christoph I Lee; Anna N A Tosteson; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Mammography Screening Practices in Average-Risk Women Aged 40-49 Years in Primary Care: A Comparison of Physician and Nonphysician Providers in Minnesota.

Authors:  Katherine Martin; Rachel I Vogel; Rebekah H Nagler; Jean F Wyman; Nancy Raymond; Deanna Teoh; Alicia M Allen; Kristine M C Talley; Susan Mason; Anne H Blaes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Racial Disparities Persist in Cancer Screening: New USPSTF Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Illuminate Inadequate Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Black Women.

Authors:  Christine E Edmonds; Samantha P Zuckerman; Carmen E Guerra
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Linking physician attitudes to their breast cancer screening practices: A survey of US primary care providers and gynecologists.

Authors:  Archana Radhakrishnan; Sarah A Nowak; Andrew M Parker; Kala Visvanathan; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.

Authors:  Chiang-Hua Chang; Julie P W Bynum; Tracy Onega; Carrie H Colla; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Regional variation in mammography use among insured women 40-49 years old: impact of a USPSTF guideline change.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Hirth; Yong-Fang Kuo; Yu-Li Lin; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Health Sci (El Monte)       Date:  2015-04-30

8.  Mammography screening and mortality by risk status in the California teachers study.

Authors:  Hannah Lui Park; Jenny Chang; Vikram Haridass; Sophia S Wang; Argyrios Ziogas; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.