Literature DB >> 26053956

Use of Preoperative Testing and Physicians' Response to Professional Society Guidance.

Alana E Sigmund1, Elizabeth R Stevens2, Jeanna D Blitz3, Joseph A Ladapo4.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The value of routine preoperative testing before most surgical procedures is widely considered to be low. To improve the quality of preoperative care and reduce waste, 2 professional societies released guidance on use of routine preoperative testing in 2002, but researchers and policymakers remain concerned about the health and cost burden of low-value care in the preoperative setting.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term national effect of the 2002 professional guidance from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the American Society of Anesthesiologists on physicians' use of routine preoperative testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of nationally representative data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to examine adults in the United States who were evaluated during preoperative visits from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2010. A quasiexperimental, difference-in-difference (DID) approach evaluated whether the publication of professional guidance in 2002 was associated with changes in preoperative testing patterns, adjusting for temporal trends in routine testing, as captured by testing patterns in general medical examinations. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Physician orders for outpatient plain radiography, hematocrit, urinalysis, electrocardiogram, and cardiac stress testing.
RESULTS: During the 14-year period, the average annual number of preoperative visits in the United States increased from 6.8 million in 1997-1999 to 9.8 million in 2002-2004 and 14.3 million in 2008-2010. After accounting for temporal trends in routine testing, we found no statistically significant overall changes in the use of plain radiography (11.3% in 1997-2002 to 9.9% in 2003-2010; DID, -1.0 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -4.1 to 2.2), hematocrit (9.4% in 1997-2002 to 4.1% in 2003-2010; DID, 1.2 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -2.2 to 4.7), urinalysis (12.2% in 1997-2002 to 8.9% in 2003-2010; DID, 2.7 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -1.7 to 7.1), or cardiac stress testing (1.0% in 1997-2002 to 2.0% in 2003-2010; DID, 0.7 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -0.1 to 1.5) after the publication of professional guidance. However, the rate of electrocardiogram testing fell (19.4% in 1997-2002 to 14.3% in 2003-2010; DID, -6.7 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -10.6 to -2.7) in the period after the publication of guidance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The release of the 2002 guidance on routine preoperative testing was associated with a reduced incidence of routine electrocardiogram testing but not of plain radiography, hematocrit, urinalysis, or cardiac stress testing. Because routine preoperative testing is generally considered to provide low incremental value, more concerted efforts to understand physician behavior and remove barriers to guideline adherence may improve health care quality and reduce costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26053956      PMCID: PMC4526021          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  30 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery).

Authors:  Kim A Eagle; Peter B Berger; Hugh Calkins; Bernard R Chaitman; Gordon A Ewy; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Lee A Fleisher; James B Froehlich; Richard J Gusberg; Jeffrey A Leppo; Thomas Ryan; Robert C Schlant; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Alice K Jacobs; Loren F Hiratzka; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Summaries for patients. Screening for coronary heart disease: recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  National hospital discharge survey: 2006 annual summary.

Authors:  Verita C Buie; Maria F Owings; Carol J DeFrances; Alexander Golosinskiy
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 13       Date:  2010-12

5.  Conflicting and changing breast cancer screening recommendations: survey study of a national sample of ob-gyns after the release of the 2009 USPSTF guidelines.

Authors:  Britta L Anderson; Mark Pearlman; Jennifer Griffin; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.095

6.  Guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery).

Authors:  K A Eagle; B H Brundage; B R Chaitman; G A Ewy; L A Fleisher; N R Hertzer; J A Leppo; T Ryan; R C Schlant; W H Spencer; J A Spittell; R D Twiss; J L Ritchie; M D Cheitlin; T J Gardner; A Garson; R P Lewis; R J Gibbons; R A O'Rourke; T J Ryan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  What influences family physicians' cancer screening decisions when practice guidelines are unclear or conflicting?

Authors:  Fred Tudiver; Remi Guibert; Jeannie Haggerty; Antonio Ciampi; Wendy Medved; Judith Belle Brown; Carol Herbert; Alan Katz; Paul Ritvo; Bill Grant; Vivek Goel; Philip Smith; Maeve O'Beirne; J Ivan Williams; Peter Moliner
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Preoperative laboratory testing in patients undergoing elective, low-risk ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  Jaime Benarroch-Gampel; Kristin M Sheffield; Casey B Duncan; Kimberly M Brown; Yimei Han; Courtney M Townsend; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Trends in the overuse of ambulatory health care services in the United States.

Authors:  Minal S Kale; Tara F Bishop; Alex D Federman; Salomeh Keyhani
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: an analysis of repeated cross-sectional data.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Saul Blecker; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  9 in total

1.  Underuse of Prevention and Lifestyle Counseling in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berger; Joseph A Ladapo
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Is Low-value Testing Before Low-risk Hand Surgery Associated With Increased Downstream Healthcare Use and Reimbursements? A National Claims Database Analysis.

Authors:  Jessica M Welch; Thompson Zhuang; Lauren M Shapiro; Alex H S Harris; Laurence C Baker; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Variation in preoperative stress testing by patient, physician and surgical type: a cohort study.

Authors:  Matthew A Pappas; Daniel I Sessler; Andrew D Auerbach; Michael W Kattan; Alex Milinovich; Eugene H Blackstone; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Development of an Interventional Radiology Specific Algorithm for Pre-Procedural Laboratory Testing.

Authors:  Lap-Heng Keung; Sarah B White; Dana Dominguez; Carolyn Hammen; Eric J Hohenwalter
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Pre-operative echocardiography among patients with coronary artery disease in the United States Veterans Affairs healthcare system: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emily B Levitan; Laura A Graham; Javier A Valle; Joshua S Richman; Robert Hollis; Carla N Holcomb; Thomas M Maddox; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Disparities in the Quality of Cardiovascular Care Between HIV-Infected Versus HIV-Uninfected Adults in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Adam K Richards; Cassandra M DeWitt; Nina T Harawa; Steven Shoptaw; William E Cunningham; John N Mafi
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Choosing Wisely: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Unnecessary Preoperative Testing.

Authors:  John Matulis; Stephen Liu; John Mecchella; Frederick North; Alison Holmes
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2017-05-23

8.  Does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? Case control study from a resource-constrained setting.

Authors:  Obada Hasan; Shah Fahad; Mohammad Mustafa; Pervaiz Hashmi; Shahryar Noordin
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-28

9.  Can a smartphone app improve medical trainees' knowledge of antibiotics?

Authors:  Michael Fralick; Reem Haj; Dhruvin Hirpara; Karen Wong; Matthew Muller; Larissa Matukas; John Bartlett; Elizabeth Leung; Linda Taggart
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.